 |
|
|
|
 |
csfp
tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Midlands, England
|
|
|
Aug-24-2008 12:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by cryophonik
Aahhh, I see. Yeah, I'm definitely not expecting it to sound like a Moog. I'm actually more interested in the features of the MEK that the Moogs don't have (e.g., 16x4 step sequencer, analog and digital ocs's, audio inputs, etc.) |
Why is it 16x4 when its only monophonic? the x4 means four chanels right?
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Aug-24-2008 14:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by cryophonik
You're not kidding!
It has four step sequencers, with 16 steps each. The sequencers can be routed to any of the available modulation destinations, including the oscillator pitch. Since the MEK has four oscillators, you can, for example, assign different pitches (notes) to each sequence/step and the resulting sequences sound like it's polyphonic. If you were to hear some of the sequences that this thing produces, you'd have a hard time believing that it's a mono synth. My Prophet 08 has the same feature and it's very nicely implemented. Dave Smith knows how to build a synth (obviously). |
Ah I see, thats very interesting and a very good idea. I like the sounds of this synth, can you post some samples when you get a feel for it, and give us a quick review?
800 bucks is a steal for something of this quality, but I'm still tossing up between this, prophet 08, Virus and nord lead 3.... Wish I had more money, but maybe when I'm a rockstar
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Aug-25-2008 05:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
cryophonik
Boom shanka

Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Elk Grove, CA USA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by kitphillips
...I'm still tossing up between this, prophet 08, Virus and nord lead 3 |
Tough choices. My opinion would be that, if you're only going to have one hardware synth, go with the Virus because it has the most features, 16-part multi-timbral, and TI (assuming you're considering a TI - if not, the other advantages also to apply to the Virus A/B/C). I've owned an A, B, C, and now a Polar and I think that they're just great machines for the money. The Snow looks like an incredible low(er)-cost alternative to the TI.
Next on the list would be a tough decision between the Nord and Prophet 08. The Prophet 08 is awesome for its sound, but not as versatile or full-featured as some of the others. The Nord 3 is excellent and very versatile, although I much prefer the 2X over the NL3. I've owned the NL1, NL2, and NL2X. I considered the 3, but I like the grittiness and character of the 2/2X much better and it has better DACs.
Last choice would be the MEK. I think it was a no-brainer addition to my synth arsenal, but I wouldn't choose it as a primary hardware synth. It's monophonic and not multi-timbral, but it sure does sound nice and has some very cool features that you can get crazy with.
___________________
cryophonik.com | facebook | soundcloud
Sonar Platinum | Ableton Live 9 | Logic Pro X | Access Virus TI2 Keyboard | Kurzweil PC3X | Nord Lead 4R | NI Maschine
|
|
Aug-25-2008 18:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by cryophonik
Tough choices. My opinion would be that, if you're only going to have one hardware synth, go with the Virus because it has the most features, 16-part multi-timbral, and TI (assuming you're considering a TI - if not, the other advantages also to apply to the Virus A/B/C). I've owned an A, B, C, and now a Polar and I think that they're just great machines for the money. The Snow looks like an incredible low(er)-cost alternative to the TI.
Next on the list would be a tough decision between the Nord and Prophet 08. The Prophet 08 is awesome for its sound, but not as versatile or full-featured as some of the others. The Nord 3 is excellent and very versatile, although I much prefer the 2X over the NL3. I've owned the NL1, NL2, and NL2X. I considered the 3, but I like the grittiness and character of the 2/2X much better and it has better DACs.
Last choice would be the MEK. I think it was a no-brainer addition to my synth arsenal, but I wouldn't choose it as a primary hardware synth. It's monophonic and not multi-timbral, but it sure does sound nice and has some very cool features that you can get crazy with. |
Hmmm, thanks for the advice, I'm slightly leaning towards getting the Nord Before the Virus, because its always been a bit of an icon for me, but the virus is probably more versatile. I'm also pretty keen on the Blofeld as well... I need to get more money I think, then I can get all of them
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Aug-26-2008 05:51
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:35.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|