 |
|
|
|
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by [Ocean]State
I agree with Cetra about the melody, the key change and the reverb.
I don't think the percussion is awful but it could be tweaked and tightened up. |
I'd also be interested to hear some examples of songs you like which have nice melodies. It sounds like I'm a little bit out of touch. A lot of songs these days don't seem to have actual melodic lines which would work outside of the underlying chord progression. I'm always keen to hear some songs containing true melodies.
I'll see what other reactions I get and look at what I can do with the percussive elements.
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by G-Con
I must admit Derail, I was surprised you created this thread. It seemed unnecessary. All of us really want as much feedback as we can get when we've done a tune but we don't post it in the MP and PS sections and offer feedback to first 10 people. Seemed a little desperate to me. Just do what the rest of us do, post the 1 thread in MP section and give plenty of feedback to other tunes in there (whether or not they have given you any) and you should get plenty of feedback on yours. |
You're right, I wanted to get as much of a reaction as possible and thought this might be a good way to boost the response. I wasn't sure how much of a no-no this practice was - I'll restrain myself in future.
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Nick Cenik
Respectfully, I agree with both posts. |
Thanks for contributing Nick. There's a pattern developing with regard to the cheesiness of the melody and the amount of reverb. I may post some examples soon of some songs I'm referencing against in terms of the reverb level. They're not the clean, upfront, anjunabeats style song, for sure. But I may well have too much reverb for even the style of trance I'm aiming for. I'll have to pay attention to this.
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
Re: Re: Shameless promotion - but offering production help...
| quote: | Originally posted by 3F05Q
That's what's SUPPOSED to happen in the producers promotion area. What YOU need to do, immediately after posting your own song in that part of the forum, is go and critique 10 tracks and throw in a link to the one you just posted asking for feedback at the end of the critique. Always worked for me. Sometimes you'll get regulars, and then you won't even need to ask, they'll critique yours first... but make sure you return the favor.
|
You're right, I should make more of a habit of critiquing other people's songs. I've been spending time on my own songs, but I should really do some more groundwork in order to build responses to my songs. It's a matter of time, I usually spend at least an hour on each critique I do, to ensure I provide as valuable feedback as I can. So the time soon adds up. But yes, definitely something I need to do more of.
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by ponsshin
I don't mean to hijack this thread but I don't really understand the point in making music if it's gonna sound terribly overheard/generic.
Be original for god'sakes! Explore, do things, twiddle those knobs dammit!
Make it sound fresh, catchy not flat and innocent.
Spend time perfecting sounds, studying melodic progression using midi effects.
MAKE THAT SHIT WORK BRO'!!
I know someone who keeps sending me tunes to get feedback. He's always so excited like "this is such a huge track bla bla" and then I say "dude, I couldn't even listen to it entirely because I was sure it was gonna sound the same from beginning to end" |
Did you listen to my song at all? You're right, it is reasonably flat, and quite innocent. It's not "edgy" - do you feel every trance song needs to be harder-edged? When you talk about songs being the same from beginning to end, do you mean in consistency of production/sound, or harmonic structure? Because I have a (really annoying, apparently) key change in this one.
Could you clarify what you mean by "studying melodic progression using midi effects"? I'm not clear what you mean by that.
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2006
Location:
|
|
|
To be a bit constructive....
It sounds like this track is in a Major key, which isn't in itself a bad thing, but it certainly lends itself to the "happy" sound of the track. I can see why a lot of people are saying it sounds "cheesy".
It lacks that feeling of melancholy, ominousness or, more importantly, tension. When writing in a minor key it seems a bit easier to convey those "feelings", even with "uplifting" trance. With a few exceptions, most tracks written in major almost always sound "cheesy" or "commercial" to my ears, although it can be done (see Sundriver - Feel).
Also, I think you can simplify the melodies a lot. It seems like you are trying to fit too many ideas in a single track, which gives the impression that the track is lacking in focus. With rare exceptions, good tracks generally make a single melodic "statement", so that one can point to a favorite track and immediately identify why they like it. ("I like this track because THIS melody is good", etc.). As I have learned the hard way, sometimes its better to arrange a simple track with a singular focus rather than a complex track that is poorly arranged.
Even melodically complex tracks follow a very "classic" structure when it comes to melody: 1. Introduction of a theme, 2. Variation on a theme, 3. Recapitulation of a theme. This type of structure goes way back to the classical days, so it sounds immediately familiar to Western ears.
Anyway, my $.02..
P.S. I'm on a mission to see how many quotes I can fit in a single reply. 
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by alanzo
The composition on that saw lead sounds like you ripped it right from Airbase - Requium
In general, the composition on this track makes me want to kill myself. Or grow pigtails and frolic through a magical rainforest. I haven't decided which. |
Well spotted, Alan. I did use Requiem's arpeggio progression for the backing saw lead. It's an effective progression, but potentially much too distinctive. My thinking was if it's in the background and it's effective, in terms of the overall flow/fits well with the melody above it, then it's fine to leave as is. Potentially I could use something more generic, or tweak the progression a bit.
Wow, this composition really hit some nerves. Whoo. As always, I'd be interested to hear some of your favourite melodic songs currently! I'm more interested in strong melodic lines - Requiem is an excellent song, one of my favourites, but I'd classify the lead as more of an arpeggio sequence rather than a true melody people could actually sing.
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Eric J
To be a bit constructive....
It sounds like this track is in a Major key, which isn't in itself a bad thing, but it certainly lends itself to the "happy" sound of the track. I can see why a lot of people are saying it sounds "cheesy".
It lacks that feeling of melancholy, ominousness or, more importantly, tension. When writing in a minor key it seems a bit easier to convey those "feelings", even with "uplifting" trance. With a few exceptions, most tracks written in major almost always sound "cheesy" or "commercial" to my ears, although it can be done (see Sundriver - Feel).
Also, I think you can simplify the melodies a lot. It seems like you are trying to fit too many ideas in a single track, which gives the impression that the track is lacking in focus. With rare exceptions, good tracks generally make a single melodic "statement", so that one can point to a favorite track and immediately identify why they like it. ("I like this track because THIS melody is good", etc.). As I have learned the hard way, sometimes its better to arrange a simple track with a singular focus rather than a complex track that is poorly arranged.
Even melodically complex tracks follow a very "classic" structure when it comes to melody: 1. Introduction of a theme, 2. Variation on a theme, 3. Recapitulation of a theme. This type of structure goes way back to the classical days, so it sounds immediately familiar to Western ears.
Anyway, my $.02..
P.S. I'm on a mission to see how many quotes I can fit in a single reply. |
Thanks for the response Eric, this is good stuff!
Yes, it's quite a happy melody, not really normal for trance. It seems it could well clear a dancefloor. What would you suggest I do - try to rework it in a minor key? As a melody I think it works well, but potentially it's the wrong musical style for it.
There are two strong harmonic progressions at work in this piece, and they're not really related to each other. I could take out the first one and use a variation of the main theme, but judging by the responses to the main theme, maybe that's not a good idea.
I'll have to think about this stuff some more, obviously.
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Eric J
Lately, Akesson - Perfect Blue. Simple, yet effective. I've heard several top trance DJ's slate this as one of their favorites at the moment. Simple arrangement, simple melody, but highly effective.
Also, Michael Cassette - Shadows Movement. That track is still on my playlist, great melody line, but again, simple. |
Thanks for these Eric - I'll be sure to check them out. I'm always up for some good melodies!
|
|
Aug-29-2008 20:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|