Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Shameless promotion - but offering production help...
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by Cetra³
Umm,

Why are you posting in here?

You already have a thread in the other forum for this track, you don't need two.

Stop being an ass.

Anyways, here is my response to your track:

It's generic.

There is way too much reverb at the start. In fact throughout the whole track there is way too much reverb in the clap or whatever hits every 2 bars.

The key change at 1:55? Or whatever it is, Seriously you don't need to change the key of your song, it's going to screw up everyone who key matches.

Your melody sounds like something out of the neverending story, I was back there with fucking Atreyu and the child like empress.

The breakdown is far too long.

The kick is sloppy, in fact the percussion needs quite a bit of work, just sounds like someone threw pots and pans in the room where you were recording and your microphone just happened to pick them up.

Your synths are sloppy and the overall loudness of the track isn't constant. You need to master it and tighten up all your sounds. Some synths are too loud, others are too quiet.

Seriously, why do people post track reviews in here? There's a whole fucking forum for it, which you obviously know about since you posted 2 fucking threads i mean what the fucking mcfuck.



I wanted to get a decent amount of feedback on this one. It's the first time I've posted a song in both forums - I thought it might be frowned upon a little bit, though nothing like this sort of a reaction! Something to learn from.

Is there too much reverb on everything or just certain instruments like the clap? I'm referencing this against tracks which are quite reverb-soaked, rather than the more upfront/clean type of trance.

Regarding key changes - is this an issue for most djs? Would they be mixing into the middle of the song? I wanted to break away slightly from using the bass progression in the intro (or a variation of it) all the way through the song. Should trance songs never have key changes?

Do you have any suggestions for the melody? I'd be interested to hear some examples of songs which you think have strong, distinctive melodies in them. I'm always keen to learn about composition, which melodies work and which don't.

Regarding the overall loudness of the song and instrument levels - which synths should I turn up or turn down? I didn't push the overall level as high as I could have, I wanted to leave a decent amount of dynamic range in the song, achieve a certain flow through dynamics. But if you think this wouldn't work on the dancefloor as a result, let me know. Some examples of songs which you think are mastered well/have "tighter" sounds, would help immensely.

Thanks for listening and providing feedback Cetra!

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:00  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by [Ocean]State
I agree with Cetra about the melody, the key change and the reverb.

I don't think the percussion is awful but it could be tweaked and tightened up.



I'd also be interested to hear some examples of songs you like which have nice melodies. It sounds like I'm a little bit out of touch. A lot of songs these days don't seem to have actual melodic lines which would work outside of the underlying chord progression. I'm always keen to hear some songs containing true melodies.

I'll see what other reactions I get and look at what I can do with the percussive elements.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:03  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by G-Con

I must admit Derail, I was surprised you created this thread. It seemed unnecessary. All of us really want as much feedback as we can get when we've done a tune but we don't post it in the MP and PS sections and offer feedback to first 10 people. Seemed a little desperate to me. Just do what the rest of us do, post the 1 thread in MP section and give plenty of feedback to other tunes in there (whether or not they have given you any) and you should get plenty of feedback on yours.


You're right, I wanted to get as much of a reaction as possible and thought this might be a good way to boost the response. I wasn't sure how much of a no-no this practice was - I'll restrain myself in future.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:05  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by Nick Cenik
Respectfully, I agree with both posts.


Thanks for contributing Nick. There's a pattern developing with regard to the cheesiness of the melody and the amount of reverb. I may post some examples soon of some songs I'm referencing against in terms of the reverb level. They're not the clean, upfront, anjunabeats style song, for sure. But I may well have too much reverb for even the style of trance I'm aiming for. I'll have to pay attention to this.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:05  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: Re: Shameless promotion - but offering production help...

quote:
Originally posted by 3F05Q
That's what's SUPPOSED to happen in the producers promotion area. What YOU need to do, immediately after posting your own song in that part of the forum, is go and critique 10 tracks and throw in a link to the one you just posted asking for feedback at the end of the critique. Always worked for me. Sometimes you'll get regulars, and then you won't even need to ask, they'll critique yours first... but make sure you return the favor.


You're right, I should make more of a habit of critiquing other people's songs. I've been spending time on my own songs, but I should really do some more groundwork in order to build responses to my songs. It's a matter of time, I usually spend at least an hour on each critique I do, to ensure I provide as valuable feedback as I can. So the time soon adds up. But yes, definitely something I need to do more of.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:06  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by ponsshin
I don't mean to hijack this thread but I don't really understand the point in making music if it's gonna sound terribly overheard/generic.

Be original for god'sakes! Explore, do things, twiddle those knobs dammit!

Make it sound fresh, catchy not flat and innocent.

Spend time perfecting sounds, studying melodic progression using midi effects.

MAKE THAT SHIT WORK BRO'!!

I know someone who keeps sending me tunes to get feedback. He's always so excited like "this is such a huge track bla bla" and then I say "dude, I couldn't even listen to it entirely because I was sure it was gonna sound the same from beginning to end"



Did you listen to my song at all? You're right, it is reasonably flat, and quite innocent. It's not "edgy" - do you feel every trance song needs to be harder-edged? When you talk about songs being the same from beginning to end, do you mean in consistency of production/sound, or harmonic structure? Because I have a (really annoying, apparently) key change in this one.

Could you clarify what you mean by "studying melodic progression using midi effects"? I'm not clear what you mean by that.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:07  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:

To be a bit constructive....

It sounds like this track is in a Major key, which isn't in itself a bad thing, but it certainly lends itself to the "happy" sound of the track. I can see why a lot of people are saying it sounds "cheesy".

It lacks that feeling of melancholy, ominousness or, more importantly, tension. When writing in a minor key it seems a bit easier to convey those "feelings", even with "uplifting" trance. With a few exceptions, most tracks written in major almost always sound "cheesy" or "commercial" to my ears, although it can be done (see Sundriver - Feel).

Also, I think you can simplify the melodies a lot. It seems like you are trying to fit too many ideas in a single track, which gives the impression that the track is lacking in focus. With rare exceptions, good tracks generally make a single melodic "statement", so that one can point to a favorite track and immediately identify why they like it. ("I like this track because THIS melody is good", etc.). As I have learned the hard way, sometimes its better to arrange a simple track with a singular focus rather than a complex track that is poorly arranged.

Even melodically complex tracks follow a very "classic" structure when it comes to melody: 1. Introduction of a theme, 2. Variation on a theme, 3. Recapitulation of a theme. This type of structure goes way back to the classical days, so it sounds immediately familiar to Western ears.

Anyway, my $.02..

P.S. I'm on a mission to see how many quotes I can fit in a single reply.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:15  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by alanzo
The composition on that saw lead sounds like you ripped it right from Airbase - Requium

In general, the composition on this track makes me want to kill myself. Or grow pigtails and frolic through a magical rainforest. I haven't decided which.


Well spotted, Alan. I did use Requiem's arpeggio progression for the backing saw lead. It's an effective progression, but potentially much too distinctive. My thinking was if it's in the background and it's effective, in terms of the overall flow/fits well with the melody above it, then it's fine to leave as is. Potentially I could use something more generic, or tweak the progression a bit.

Wow, this composition really hit some nerves. Whoo. As always, I'd be interested to hear some of your favourite melodic songs currently! I'm more interested in strong melodic lines - Requiem is an excellent song, one of my favourites, but I'd classify the lead as more of an arpeggio sequence rather than a true melody people could actually sing.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:18  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by derail
As always, I'd be interested to hear some of your favourite melodic songs currently!


Lately, Akesson - Perfect Blue. Simple, yet effective. I've heard several top trance DJ's slate this as one of their favorites at the moment. Simple arrangement, simple melody, but highly effective.

Also, Michael Cassette - Shadows Movement. That track is still on my playlist, great melody line, but again, simple.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:38  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by Eric J
To be a bit constructive....

It sounds like this track is in a Major key, which isn't in itself a bad thing, but it certainly lends itself to the "happy" sound of the track. I can see why a lot of people are saying it sounds "cheesy".

It lacks that feeling of melancholy, ominousness or, more importantly, tension. When writing in a minor key it seems a bit easier to convey those "feelings", even with "uplifting" trance. With a few exceptions, most tracks written in major almost always sound "cheesy" or "commercial" to my ears, although it can be done (see Sundriver - Feel).

Also, I think you can simplify the melodies a lot. It seems like you are trying to fit too many ideas in a single track, which gives the impression that the track is lacking in focus. With rare exceptions, good tracks generally make a single melodic "statement", so that one can point to a favorite track and immediately identify why they like it. ("I like this track because THIS melody is good", etc.). As I have learned the hard way, sometimes its better to arrange a simple track with a singular focus rather than a complex track that is poorly arranged.

Even melodically complex tracks follow a very "classic" structure when it comes to melody: 1. Introduction of a theme, 2. Variation on a theme, 3. Recapitulation of a theme. This type of structure goes way back to the classical days, so it sounds immediately familiar to Western ears.

Anyway, my $.02..

P.S. I'm on a mission to see how many quotes I can fit in a single reply.


Thanks for the response Eric, this is good stuff!

Yes, it's quite a happy melody, not really normal for trance. It seems it could well clear a dancefloor. What would you suggest I do - try to rework it in a minor key? As a melody I think it works well, but potentially it's the wrong musical style for it.

There are two strong harmonic progressions at work in this piece, and they're not really related to each other. I could take out the first one and use a variation of the main theme, but judging by the responses to the main theme, maybe that's not a good idea.

I'll have to think about this stuff some more, obviously.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:46  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by Eric J
Lately, Akesson - Perfect Blue. Simple, yet effective. I've heard several top trance DJ's slate this as one of their favorites at the moment. Simple arrangement, simple melody, but highly effective.

Also, Michael Cassette - Shadows Movement. That track is still on my playlist, great melody line, but again, simple.


Thanks for these Eric - I'll be sure to check them out. I'm always up for some good melodies!

Old Post Aug-29-2008 20:47  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by derail
What would you suggest I do - try to rework it in a minor key?


Honestly, if I were in your shoes, I'd just start on a new track. No sense in beating yourself up trying to constantly rework this one when you have already put so much time into it. Once you have a track near completion, its very difficult to rework it, because you now have a distorted perspective on how you think it should sound. By the time you rework it, you'll have spent just as much time on a rework than if you just started a new project.

Better to start fresh with a new idea and a new perspective. I know its hard to shelve a track, especially if you have spent a good deal of time working on it, but sometimes it's better to just chalk some tracks up to experience and move on. I hear loads of "big" producers talk about how many unfinished and unreleased projects they have just lying around, so it happens to everyone. It is a natural part of the creative process.

Old Post Aug-29-2008 21:14  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Shameless promotion - but offering production help...
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackid trance track played by Sander Van Doorn [2009] [2]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackJohn Askew - "Vellum" (Backbeat Remix) [2005]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!