 |
|
|
|
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
My summary:
CDJ-1000MK3's - Get these if you have a lot of money, and don't mind the fact that within the next year Pioneer will release a pro player with features from the CDJ-400 (likely even better, of course). Nothing really wrong with these decks, but they are really pretty no frills for the exorbitant price Pioneer charges based on their legacy.
CDJ-800MK2's - Get these if you want the large platter of the 1000, but don't want to spend the huge price jump for the 1000's for the few features you gain. If you intend to use a DVS (Serato, Traktor Pro, etc.) the 800's + DVS will give you all the features of the 1000 and more (except the .02 accuracy, but that's really not a huge deal).
CDJ-400's - Around the same price as the 800's... but with the accuracy of the 1000's, with effects, USB storage support, and MIDI/HID connectivity. If you don't mind the smaller platter, these are the most advanced Pioneer decks out there. Pioneer clearly left out features like the wave display and hot cues on purpose.
CDJ-200's - A great budget deck. The lack of vinyl emulation will limit your use with a DVS, but for basic mixing they are solid.
You can't really go wrong with any of the Pioneer decks, and if you know how to play on one type, you will have NO issues going to another. And if you do, practice a LOT more 
And yes, I've played on them all, and personally have 2 CDJ-1000MK2's.
|
|
Dec-08-2008 23:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Nothing official of course, but right now they have the CDJ-400, and if you haven't looked at their MEP-7000 dual deck, it has a LOT of really cool stuff in it.
It's only inevitable that the next step is a pro-level single deck with these features.
| quote: | Originally posted by Jarvmeister
Do you have any other info on this? I'd be interested to hear more, I'd certainly consider trading my 1000mk3s in for a later model..... |
|
|
Dec-09-2008 20:30
|
|
|
 |
 |
KiNeTiC ENeRgY
t3cHn0_43ad

Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Boca Raton
|
|
|
Dec-09-2008 21:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
It's just nicer. Don't you find it annoying using stutter mode, since auto-cue doesn't really work the same with Serato?
|
|
Dec-11-2008 12:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
Tom Scott
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Camberley, England
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Ryan0751
It's just nicer. Don't you find it annoying using stutter mode, since auto-cue doesn't really work the same with Serato? |
I always use stutter-mode when DJing. Pinpoints the cue point to the millisecond.
I personally own and use a pair of CDJ400s and I have no problems with them at all theyre great. Would like hot cues on them though ha. Besides that i think after getting the 400s it would be much more beneficial to a DJ to upgrade in terms of mixers and effects units rather than CDJs.
To the comment about only needing 200s to be a proffessional Trance DJ I have to disagree as well. To be a successfull and 'good' DJ, in my opinion, you need to constantly find ways to keep the crowd entertained and excited by keeping a good flow, and unfortunately, just 'letting the tracks breathe' is not a good way to do this. In the long run a DJ will reach a point where he needs the means to play a seamless and well flowing mix; I just don't think you can do that on the 200s.
___________________
Tom Scott Facebook
Tom Scott SoundCloud
Tom Scott - Found Again (FREE ALBUM!)
___________________
He's got doctors, nurses, fireman, churches,
Kindergarten, wedding bells and jet black hearses;
Passport, bankcard, maybe his own yard, Locks and alarms,
Trinkets and charms, Maybe a baby in his arms
|
|
Dec-16-2008 23:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
dJohn
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location: 619
|
|
|
Re: CDJ 200 vs. MK3
| quote: | Originally posted by Stephen Wiley
As far as the MK 3's go, I am not a bloghouse electro funk DJ so all those bells and whistles don't mean shit to me...
...As a trance DJ who really likes to let the tracks breathe on their own I really don't see how an MK3 would be so much better, especially when you look at pricing.
Maybe the mk4 will be great, but for a typical trance DJ you don't need anything better than a 200. Just my opinion. What's yours? |
I don't get what you are trying to say. Do you want to buy cdj units? Or are you arbitrarily bringing up silly conclusions using vague generalities to spark discussion?
Bloghouse electro funk dj...that is awesome, as well as the most pretentious train fuck wreck mish mash of labeling I've come across. Those bells and whistles can be used by anybody if they are used right.
But since you are a "typical trance DJ who wants their tracks to breathe "(whatever that means) I too, doubt you will need extra complexities, seeing as you probably wouldn't even know what to do with them.
So you are right in your own aspect. Your tracks are probably mixed towards the beginning and end, so stick with what you need: nothing more than a set of plain old tables and a good mixer.
That is my opinion.
Close this shit.
|
|
Dec-17-2008 00:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|