Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > CDJ 200 vs. MK3
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
bigsnail
Doesn't Spill



Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas

the jog wheel on the 400s is straight. a lot better than the 200s fo sho.


___________________
PARTY TILL YOURE HOMELESS

www.sounds-like.org

Old Post Dec-08-2008 22:24  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for bigsnail Click here to Send bigsnail a Private Message Add bigsnail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

My summary:

CDJ-1000MK3's - Get these if you have a lot of money, and don't mind the fact that within the next year Pioneer will release a pro player with features from the CDJ-400 (likely even better, of course). Nothing really wrong with these decks, but they are really pretty no frills for the exorbitant price Pioneer charges based on their legacy.

CDJ-800MK2's - Get these if you want the large platter of the 1000, but don't want to spend the huge price jump for the 1000's for the few features you gain. If you intend to use a DVS (Serato, Traktor Pro, etc.) the 800's + DVS will give you all the features of the 1000 and more (except the .02 accuracy, but that's really not a huge deal).

CDJ-400's - Around the same price as the 800's... but with the accuracy of the 1000's, with effects, USB storage support, and MIDI/HID connectivity. If you don't mind the smaller platter, these are the most advanced Pioneer decks out there. Pioneer clearly left out features like the wave display and hot cues on purpose.

CDJ-200's - A great budget deck. The lack of vinyl emulation will limit your use with a DVS, but for basic mixing they are solid.

You can't really go wrong with any of the Pioneer decks, and if you know how to play on one type, you will have NO issues going to another. And if you do, practice a LOT more

And yes, I've played on them all, and personally have 2 CDJ-1000MK2's.

Old Post Dec-08-2008 23:42  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Imagin
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Buy what you can reasonably afford and feels the best to you.

I will say the MK3's are an industry standard for a reason. Theyre just that good.


___________________
I will never be forgotten. I will only fade as time goes on from your conscious thoughts

Old Post Dec-09-2008 06:08  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Imagin Click here to Send Imagin a Private Message Visit Imagin's homepage! Add Imagin to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Jarvmeister
Building a fire......



Registered: May 2001
Location: Trancentral

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
.....and don't mind the fact that within the next year Pioneer will release a pro player with features from the CDJ-400 (likely even better, of course).....


Do you have any other info on this? I'd be interested to hear more, I'd certainly consider trading my 1000mk3s in for a later model.....

Old Post Dec-09-2008 20:24 
Click Here to See the Profile for Jarvmeister Click here to Send Jarvmeister a Private Message Add Jarvmeister to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Nothing official of course, but right now they have the CDJ-400, and if you haven't looked at their MEP-7000 dual deck, it has a LOT of really cool stuff in it.

It's only inevitable that the next step is a pro-level single deck with these features.

quote:
Originally posted by Jarvmeister
Do you have any other info on this? I'd be interested to hear more, I'd certainly consider trading my 1000mk3s in for a later model.....

Old Post Dec-09-2008 20:30  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
KiNeTiC ENeRgY
t3cHn0_43ad



Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Boca Raton

MkII's > MkIII's > 200

Old Post Dec-09-2008 21:03  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for KiNeTiC ENeRgY Click here to Send KiNeTiC ENeRgY a Private Message Add KiNeTiC ENeRgY to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Jarvmeister
Building a fire......



Registered: May 2001
Location: Trancentral

quote:
Originally posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY
MkII's > MkIII's


Explain!

Old Post Dec-10-2008 22:40 
Click Here to See the Profile for Jarvmeister Click here to Send Jarvmeister a Private Message Add Jarvmeister to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
epdarks
mnb4fl



Registered: Sep 2005
Location: mpls mn

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
And if you ever have any intention of using a DVS (Serato, Traktor Scratch Pro), do NOT get the 200's. You want a player with vinyl emulation.

Using CDJ-400's with Serato in HID (native) mode is the bomb.


I have no problems using my 200s with Serato. Why is vinyl mode necessary? I haven't gotten a chance to use 800s/1000s...

Old Post Dec-11-2008 03:09  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for epdarks Click here to Send epdarks a Private Message Visit epdarks's homepage! Add epdarks to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

It's just nicer. Don't you find it annoying using stutter mode, since auto-cue doesn't really work the same with Serato?

Old Post Dec-11-2008 12:44  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Tom Scott
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Camberley, England

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
It's just nicer. Don't you find it annoying using stutter mode, since auto-cue doesn't really work the same with Serato?


I always use stutter-mode when DJing. Pinpoints the cue point to the millisecond.

I personally own and use a pair of CDJ400s and I have no problems with them at all theyre great. Would like hot cues on them though ha. Besides that i think after getting the 400s it would be much more beneficial to a DJ to upgrade in terms of mixers and effects units rather than CDJs.

To the comment about only needing 200s to be a proffessional Trance DJ I have to disagree as well. To be a successfull and 'good' DJ, in my opinion, you need to constantly find ways to keep the crowd entertained and excited by keeping a good flow, and unfortunately, just 'letting the tracks breathe' is not a good way to do this. In the long run a DJ will reach a point where he needs the means to play a seamless and well flowing mix; I just don't think you can do that on the 200s.


___________________

Tom Scott Facebook
Tom Scott SoundCloud
Tom Scott - Found Again (FREE ALBUM!)
___________________

He's got doctors, nurses, fireman, churches,
Kindergarten, wedding bells and jet black hearses;
Passport, bankcard, maybe his own yard, Locks and alarms,
Trinkets and charms, Maybe a baby in his arms

Old Post Dec-16-2008 23:27  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Tom Scott Click here to Send Tom Scott a Private Message Visit Tom Scott's homepage! Add Tom Scott to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
dJohn
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2002
Location: 619
Re: CDJ 200 vs. MK3

quote:
Originally posted by Stephen Wiley
As far as the MK 3's go, I am not a bloghouse electro funk DJ so all those bells and whistles don't mean shit to me...

...As a trance DJ who really likes to let the tracks breathe on their own I really don't see how an MK3 would be so much better, especially when you look at pricing.

Maybe the mk4 will be great, but for a typical trance DJ you don't need anything better than a 200. Just my opinion. What's yours?


I don't get what you are trying to say. Do you want to buy cdj units? Or are you arbitrarily bringing up silly conclusions using vague generalities to spark discussion?
Bloghouse electro funk dj...that is awesome, as well as the most pretentious train fuck wreck mish mash of labeling I've come across. Those bells and whistles can be used by anybody if they are used right.
But since you are a "typical trance DJ who wants their tracks to breathe "(whatever that means) I too, doubt you will need extra complexities, seeing as you probably wouldn't even know what to do with them.
So you are right in your own aspect. Your tracks are probably mixed towards the beginning and end, so stick with what you need: nothing more than a set of plain old tables and a good mixer.

That is my opinion.

Close this shit.

Old Post Dec-17-2008 00:04  South Korea
Click Here to See the Profile for dJohn Click here to Send dJohn a Private Message Add dJohn to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > CDJ 200 vs. MK3
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): « 1 [2]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackyet another track to id... [2006] [2]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPapacha - Benimussa (Extended Original Mix) [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!