I have definitely found that less is more when it comes to the equipment I use, though. If I allow myself to use just one or two pieces of kit, I can almost guarantee I'll be more creative than if I let myself casually scroll through lots of different synths.

quote:

Originally posted by pwnage1 It's better to use 20 layers that sound good solo and great together than 10 layers that sound great solo and good together.

Definitely, alot of layers can add more depth to a track.. having depth in a track is very important for a track to last longer.
Atleast for home listeners.

___________________


http://soundcloud.com/subtara

Im a less is more man when i started i used to ram with shite and as i have progressed I have thinned out my mixes and they getting thinner layer wise but fuller in qualiy wise and people are saying they prefer my new stuff to old. Also whenever you feedback on tunes in producers forum 1st time posters usually ram with stuff and experienced people generally dont.

Most of armin a state of trance album is sparse songs with great sounding melodies or at least the on the beach cd is

___________________
My Links
Ocean State recordings
My Myspace
Facebook
Soundcloud

Processing a highly structured and complex pattern of sensory input as a unified percept of "music" is probably one of the most elaborate features of the human brain.....understanding how music is perceived and how it may elicit intense sensations is far from being understood.

If you are bad at making music then your songs will suck regardless of how simple or complex you try to make them. There are no magical rules. A complex track is not necessarily bad and a simple track is not necessarily good.

quote:

Originally posted by Subtle Definitely, alot of layers can add more depth to a track.. having depth in a track is very important for a track to last longer. Atleast for home listeners.

I disagree. The tracks I listen to most at home are things like salt tank and chicane, which are fairly minimal in a lot of cases. My main gripe with most modern trance is all the fluff that talentless producers pack in. You especially hear it with a lot of anjunabeats tracks released in the last year or so. Theres not much melody going on, but its not going on over about 10 layers of pads. Then they try to pass it off as uplifting
Less is definately more. Adding more layers to an already good track will spoil it 9/10 times.

___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook

quote:

Originally posted by kitphillips I disagree. The tracks I listen to most at home are things like salt tank and chicane, which are fairly minimal in a lot of cases. My main gripe with most modern trance is all the fluff that talentless producers pack in. You especially hear it with a lot of anjunabeats tracks released in the last year or so. Theres not much melody going on, but its not going on over about 10 layers of pads. Then they try to pass it off as uplifting Less is definately more. Adding more layers to an already good track will spoil it 9/10 times.

Depth doesnt mean alot of layers, it just means that there is more behind the tune than that catches the ear.

Salt Tank and Chicane are fairly minimal but there are alot of depth to those tracks as well.

Like panning a percussion instrument or an effect left to right can really do the trick.

___________________


http://soundcloud.com/subtara

I think that it is a problem with modern trance that songs are getting one main lead melody and then several background plucks and too many pads. I think that songs with lots of layered sounds that take up a similar amount in mix and there isnt really a main lead going on is really cool. I haven't heard this much in trance and this is what i want to eventually be able to produce.

I also like as JBJ was saying the old school 20 layers type thing this is also something i like and i want to produce trance like this also.

The problem with trance now i think is more the idea of one lead and 50 plucks playing chords or arps in the background. As well as the obvious buildup breakdown structure.

I am really tired and had to rush that so it might not have made much sense.

___________________
k;,hj,mnbjbvnbvnm mytdjkdty

quote:

Originally posted by pwnage1 I think that songs with lots of layered sounds that take up a similar amount in mix and there isnt really a main lead going on is really cool.

Like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGfmTTEZh-c

sometimes it just gets too little u know? u loose the groove and everything beacuse its simply lacking enough elements.

quote:

Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles Like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGfmTTEZh-c

Yeah thats a pretty cool song this is what trance was meant to be.

Edit: I am not trying to say that songs with background melodies aren't real trance. Background melodies can sometimes add something but its just now i find that every trance song uses too many and they are all the same chord pluck patterns. So i think thats what you guys mean by less is more don't add stupid boring melodies in the background.

The main thing i am trying to do with my trance music is give it a different structure than that in most of todays trance. I like to fade in and out of melodies and revisit them or variations of them later, or as i talked about earlier layering sounds all taking up the about the same amount in a mix.

___________________
k;,hj,mnbjbvnbvnm mytdjkdty

Last edited by pwnage1 on Jan-04-2009 at 05:02