Registered: Jan 2007
Location: West LA, California (where retired party people live)
quote:
Originally posted by Brian Scott
Yes, because longer drinking hours combined with less sleep = safer drivers.
yup... quit being a pussy paco
___________________
Jaded, old fart is me.
Feb-12-2009 01:08
mar46017
Mikey Esq.
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Southern California USA
I'm sure successful nightclubs would love to spend some money on lobbying the state legislature. (but I don't think nightclubs are generating as much revenue these days vs. a couple years ago when all my buddies were making mad commission from all the sub-prime loans they sold and spending it on bottles).
I'd totally be for it. But I'm sure it is way harder said than done.
They tried this in SF a few years ago...using SF as a test-market.
It unanimously passed all the way to the final vote by the State Board or whoever makes the final votes...where only one person said Yes, and every other person said No. Failed miserably in th final vote.
The State Rep who backed it and pushed for it back then said it would be attenpted again from a little different approach in time....wonder if this is it...
BTW, statistics show a 4am cut-off is safer than a 2am cutoff for clubs... Since a lot of people get there at midnight-1am, they tend to binge/overdrink since it isn't too long before last call.
Although, the reverse argument is that the the time between 2am and 4am lets people sober up. Makes sense...
Feb-12-2009 01:24
jonmitz
mixcloud.com/mitztronic
Registered: May 2004
Location: San Francisco
I guess I should clarify. If people are forced to stop drinking at 2 am and I don't leave the club until 4 am, then it likely that there will be less drunk drivers on the road when I drive home at 4 am. If they continued drinking until 4 am or later, then my journey would be more risky.
If it werent for that then I'm all for it. I've known many people (I can think of 3 off the top of my head) who were killed in drunk-driving related incidents (both at fault and innocent)
Feb-12-2009 02:56
gerard6975
GERARD NOT GERALD
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Culver City, US of A
quote:
Originally posted by jonmitz
I guess I should clarify. If people are forced to stop drinking at 2 am and I don't leave the club until 4 am, then it likely that there will be less drunk drivers on the road when I drive home at 4 am. If they continued drinking until 4 am or later, then my journey would be more risky.
If it werent for that then I'm all for it. I've known many people (I can think of 3 off the top of my head) who were killed in drunk-driving related incidents (both at fault and innocent)
well, that's already being implemented. and sorry about those people who died but those accidents happened within the current law.
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
I think it is a good idea. I'm originally from Miami and there isn't really a "last call". All the clubs in the downtown area have 24hr liqueur licenses. Most of the clubs close and stop serving at 5am. We need that here, anywhere you serve alcohol you will have dumb people. Why should the rest of us suffer!!
Feb-12-2009 03:22
R!CH
check signal
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
i've been saying this for years! though the more i think about it, "last call" is a dated concept altogether...
___________________
Feb-12-2009 03:42
DJ Reese
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
I think 3am would be the way to go. If a club doesn't close at 2 it usually closes at 4. That gives an hour of sober up time. Plus, at a 4am venue, party primetime is from 1 to 3. I hate that just as the headliners come on, it's last call. And what do people tend to do then, pop their little pill cause no one wants to be sober the rest of the night.
I'm sure many of you would argue with me on this, but I think you would see less drug use too. No one wants to be sober so they find other means. And from someone who's job it was for 5 years to watch every last person come out the club, it's a hell of a lot different cround coming out at 3 because they stopped drinking at 2, and the crowd that comes out at 4 because they have found other ways to not be sober.
___________________
"Getting a hold of the drugs and shirts have been no problem. But the car and tape recorder were not easy things to round up at 6:30 in the afternoon in Hollywood."