|
| quote: | Originally posted by Neo Hacker
Why is it stupid ? The Xone is, to me, more of a studio mixer than a DJ mixer like the DJM. I guess you were looking for a specific way to hook up, for exemple, an EFX with the Xone without using another channel ? Yes, the Xone is more "complicated" for the send/returns features, but I find this way to be much better than the DJM way. Anyway, I've always been a studio console guy.
For the record, I own a Xone92 and owned an EFX1000 in the past. |
Yes, i also think its more studio mixer than regular djm mixer.
And yes, exakly, and easy function to hook up the efx signal to master output without having to route it through the mixer!
For 92:
You got two "easiest" options that im aware of, that is
one: returning the efx signal to mic fader, and be gentle when fade up that fader simulteanasly as you fade down the original channel.
two: you route the efx signal through a spare channel and could use the crossfader for smoothest "dry to wet controll", sounds decent without different sound changes, but you always must remember to have the same eq tweaks on both channels.
And i dont understand how u do if you want to efx two channels at the same time.
That is not OK for beeing 92/62 at that price range.
I think djm solution is good, not complicated at all.
Otherwise i really love the 92.. so wonderful sound if you wanna go analogue..
And sorry for my bad english!
|