Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Discussion: Production in Ableton... Why does it sound so bad???
Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by Terrence Parker
The mod from abletonlivedj.com did some tests: http://abletonlivedj.com/forum/view...c+live&start=45


The link asks for a username and password.

Old Post Feb-25-2009 00:27  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Terrence Parker
1.6180339887



Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Germany

Post from Tarekith (http://www.abletonlivedj.com/forum/)
quote:

Ok, here goes. I tested Live 7.1 versus Logic 8.0. As we are talking about overall sound quality and not timing issues (and not saying there are any), I ran the test using three audio loops all at the same tempo of 120 BPM. I also tried this test using projects that contained up to 10 audio loops, but the results were identical, so I'm going to discuss the 3 loops test in order to save my bandwidth, as I'm making all files available for DL:

http://tarekith.com/assets/Live7VsLogic8.zip

These are just random audio loops from my collection, I tried to pick loops that not only sounded decent together, but also demonstrated a lot of dynamics and frequency spread to make audible comparisons easier. All three loops are 24bit/44.1kHz wav files, and exactly 4 bars long at 120BPM. I placed each loop on it's own stereo audio track in both Live and Logic, and set the track faders to -6.0dBFS for all tracks in both apps. The following additional settings were used:

- Both apps latency set to 512 samples.
- Live 7 uses the equivalent of a 3dB pan law, so Logic was set to -3dB Compensated.
- Both projects set to 24bit/44.1kHz default.
- Files in Live were not warped, and did not have Fade on.

Here is the Live Project screenshot:



Here is the Logic Project screenshot:




At this point playback of both projects sounded identical to my ears, at numerous volume tests, using both Mackie HR824 speakers, and my Shure E3c and Sony MDR v700DJ headphones. So I next rendered (Live) and bounced (Logic) the projects down, in both cases choosing the output format to be 24bit/44.1kHz wav files, non-normalized, with no dither. These were then loaded into Logic 8 on seperate tracks, as you can see they look identical:



Listening comparison once again made the two files sound 100% identical, having my wife randomly solo each track while listening through my Sony headphones with my back turned, I was unable to tell any difference in audio quality no matter which was solo'd.

HOWEVER...

As I started to get more scientific in my comparisons, I discovered that there WERE differences between the files. I flipped the phase of the Logic waveform and played the two files back simultaneously. This resulted in audible (err... or not) silence, I could not hear anything as the two files were cancelling. BUT, looking at the master meter in Logic, I could see that some signal was playing back, albeit VERY quietly. As you can see in the screen shot below, using the Inspector XL spectrum analyzer, there are some very low level differences in the files:



It's important to look at the dB scale in the plug in before jumping to conclusions. In the main audible range of human hearing, the difference between the two signals is almost at -90dB, which is only 6dB above the absolute noise floor of your standard CD quality (i.e. 16bit) wav file. This is also below the dither level that would be in the file, had we applied any (and dither is almost always applied to the files you will hear in the real world). So, while there IS a difference between the renders of Live 7 and Logic 8 now, that difference is:

- For all intents inaudible, being well below the average music signal in todays music.
- Likely obscured by dither, had we applied any.
- Primarily in the low end of the audio spectrum, well below 250Hz, where the ear is least sensitive.

Anyway, the main conclusion I would draw based on these tests, is that there is no audible difference in sound quality between Live 7 and Logic 8, though they are not producing bit for bit identical copies. So, have fun arguing about the test I ran, I'm off to go shopping with the wife, fun. Not. Smile

Source: http://abletonlivedj.com/forum/view...c+live&start=45


___________________
https://soundcloud.com/j-t-parker

Old Post Feb-25-2009 00:34  Germany
Click Here to See the Profile for Terrence Parker Click here to Send Terrence Parker a Private Message Add Terrence Parker to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lolo
I play Trance no Dance



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brussels, Belgium

need more proof?? You should get in touch with skilled artists, probably... LOL jk.

Well this is clear that people using Ableton now are just too lazy to press ctrl-j and freeze/flatten their stuff, which results in harsh sounding tracks, because they can't eq or else their cpu will stop.

Having almost anything printed onto audio tracks affects your workflow the good way and organizes your job, most of the time. I kept saying this to our musicians, but they wouldn't believe me. Which is why they all need a full spec quad core monster and still sound harsh.

Your point of view reminds me of that big reason debate a few years ago... did it naturally sound harsh or not...

That is quite simply another debate for me... there are artists out there who'd better get skilled and learn how to mix, how to place their speakers, how to listen to their ears. In short, they'd better come and read the TA producer pages :-)

Listen to that Josh Gabriel album, even if it's not your thing. It doesn't sound harsh at all, though it's been entirely produced into Live.

I've been constantly switching back and forth between logic and live recently. The main differences are in terms of features, not in terms of sound.


___________________
Http://www.airwave-music.com is my new site. Djairwave.com is no more. A new era has begun

Old Post Feb-25-2009 05:54  Belgium
Click Here to See the Profile for Lolo Click here to Send Lolo a Private Message Visit Lolo's homepage! Add Lolo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Lolo

I've been constantly switching back and forth between logic and live recently. The main differences are in terms of features, not in terms of sound.


As an experienced producer, can you tell me, in your opinion, what are the missing features that keep you from switching over to Live totally? Obviously Logic's built in synths and effects are really good, but Live's audio manipulation is miles ahead of Logic's. What keeps you switching back and forth between the two?

Old Post Feb-25-2009 06:09  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lolo
I play Trance no Dance



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brussels, Belgium

I already do entire productions from scratch into both apps.

I like both equally. I can't choose. It truly depends on the mood. But one thing's sure: if I need to go fast, that's with Ableton Live. But if I need a good Subtractive synth, you won't see me rely on Analog. I'm just not a fan, while ES2 sounds great to my ears. But I don't want to choose between those two.

If I had Protools, you'd see me making entire productions in it. I should start in melodyne now.

And to be honest, you are for the least as much experienced as I am, if not more. :-)


___________________
Http://www.airwave-music.com is my new site. Djairwave.com is no more. A new era has begun

Old Post Feb-25-2009 06:20  Belgium
Click Here to See the Profile for Lolo Click here to Send Lolo a Private Message Visit Lolo's homepage! Add Lolo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Lolo
And to be honest, you are for the least as much experienced as I am, if not more. :-)


Thanks, that may or may not be true, though I certainly wish I had your discography under my belt!

Old Post Feb-25-2009 06:25  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Brownsound
tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Houston, USA

The Nine Inch Nails album Year Zero was also produced entirely in Ableton Live.

Old Post Feb-25-2009 13:18  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Brownsound Click here to Send Brownsound a Private Message Add Brownsound to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
kitphillips
is actually a guy.



Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia

Yeah, I suspect it has more to do with ableton being the first DAW a lot of people use, and being readily available on torrents. The same can't be said for logic or cubase. Ableton's a small easy download for the piratical, and a relatively cheap option for the upstanding.


___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook

Old Post Feb-25-2009 13:33  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for kitphillips Click here to Send kitphillips a Private Message Add kitphillips to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands

I took a shot a Ableton and found it harder to make a clean production than in any other software I have encountered thus far. Although that doesn't tell much in terms of quality of the program I can understand that more people could have the same problem I do. Of course I've seen people do brilliant productions on Ableton Live as well.

The problem is probably somewhere in between Ableton and it's user. Some programs just don't quite work for certain people. I like the Ableton workflow (it has a more or less hybrid tracker/sequencer feel to me, and since I'm primarily using trackers for composing the step to Ableton was really easy) but somehow it influenced my sound design in a negative way.


___________________

Storyteller Website | Storyteller @ Facebook | Storyteller @ Beatport | Storyteller @ Soundcloud | Stephen J. Kroos - Europa (Storyteller Remix)
Anthony Mea - Get It On (Storyteller Remix)

quote:
If less is more think about how much more more would be.
-Frasier

Old Post Feb-25-2009 14:02  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for Storyteller Click here to Send Storyteller a Private Message Visit Storyteller's homepage! Add Storyteller to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
david.michael
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Dayton, OH, USA

quote:
Originally posted by kitphillips
Yeah, I suspect it has more to do with ableton being the first DAW a lot of people use, and being readily available on torrents. The same can't be said for logic or cubase. Ableton's a small easy download for the piratical, and a relatively cheap option for the upstanding.


Agreed... it's likely along the same vein as "FL Studio Syndrome". There's nothing inherently wrong with the audio engine or rendering... I think it's a more conceptual "problem" than technical.

Old Post Feb-25-2009 14:11  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for david.michael Click here to Send david.michael a Private Message Visit david.michael's homepage! Add david.michael to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Waza
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Scotland, Edinburgh

Well if your using one hit samples you should not be getting those harsh sounds coming out should you? your not time stretching them to much.

Old Post Feb-25-2009 16:22  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Waza Click here to Send Waza a Private Message Add Waza to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

quote:
Originally posted by Waza
Well if your using one hit samples you should not be getting those harsh sounds coming out should you? your not time stretching them to much.

Ableton is set to warp samples automatically, so even one-hits can get some "graininess" to them if you don't turn the warping off.

Old Post Feb-25-2009 16:40  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Discussion: Production in Ableton... Why does it sound so bad???
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHardsyle remix (Gigi D'Agostino - Bla bla bla) [2015] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackThe Bravery - An Honest Mistake [2005]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!