quote:

Originally posted by Rasidel Slika CHANGE

here ya go.



don't spend it all, you're gonna need some later.

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo this woman is blindfolded for a reason.

the law is blind - playa

i know you were being a smart ass, but some foos on here prolly didn't know that.

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo this woman is blindfolded for a reason.

so she doesn't have to see travesties like retroactive telecom immunity?

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo this woman is blindfolded for a reason.

Thats great but how about looking at what is actually the case in this country...

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by ******** Seplling don't demonstrate intelligence and educatoin - knowing does.

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo this woman is blindfolded for a reason.

just need some cuffs up on dis chick and we gotta partah.


wait, wrong forum. :-/

You should see her hit the beer bong blindfolded...

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by ******** Seplling don't demonstrate intelligence and educatoin - knowing does.

quote:

Originally posted by josh4 so she doesn't have to see travesties like retroactive telecom immunity?

do you think before you vomit talking points?

1) that was an act of Congress. read the frikken act.
2) that, by no means, makes it immune to court challenge...which btw is being done as we speak.

she will remain impartial (we can hope because that is the inherent nature of all civilized jurisprudence) throughout the challenge regardless.

quote:

Originally posted by Clovis Thats great but how about looking at what is actually the case in this country...

example, Johnny Cochran?

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo example, Johnny Cochran?

if it doesn't fit; you must acquit.

Last edited by LazFX on May-03-2009 at 08:17

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo do you think before you vomit talking points? 1) that was an act of Congress. read the frikken act. 2) that, by no means, makes it immune to court challenge...which btw is being done as we speak. she will remain impartial (we can hope because that is the inherent nature of all civilized jurisprudence) throughout the challenge regardless.

Oh yes! I don't think I just act. Anything that has potential to aggravate you gets priority.

I just noticed the thread title included "Obama's America..."

Obama's america sounds a little dictator(ish) and rather undemocratic. I don't want to live in Obama's america anymore than I wanted to live in Bush's america.

quote:

Originally posted by jerZ07002 I just noticed the thread title included "Obama's America..." Obama's america sounds a little dictator(ish) and rather undemocratic. I don't want to live in Obama's america anymore than I wanted to live in Bush's america.

+1