 |
|
|
|
 |
mfitterer1
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Oregon
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
I dont get how you can get sidetracked by hardware...if anything its easier and faster to get good sounds out of hardware, I bet the abundance of software and their parameters sidetracks people far more.
That said...be ready to accept a sound quality downgrade by going all ITB from a Hardware setup...I would not do it for the reason you stated. |
LOL still not learning...
|
|
Jul-23-2009 21:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
mfitterer1
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Oregon
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Eric J
I did it, and I'm not regretting it. I work so much faster, and for me the difference in quality is negligible. Total recall is a big plus. That being said, I have toyed with the idea of picking up maybe a Moog Voyager or LP just as a supplement. If I am going to pick up hardware at this point, its going to be vintage or modern analogue (Moog, SE, etc.).
I sunk all my money into my monitors, computer and converters. |
Smart man.
|
|
Jul-23-2009 21:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
Jason_R
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: High Wycombe
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Eric J
I sunk all my money into my monitors, computer and converters. |
This is good advice. I've had to sell all my hardware following unemployment after a car accident and to be honest I'm not really missing it at all (Access Virus C / Novation K Station / JP8080).
The only thing I wished I could have kept are my monitors but that goes without saying really. Still headphones will do for now.
|
|
Jul-23-2009 22:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
alanzo
The Equalizer Womanizer

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
I'm assuming that most of the issue is in physical synthesizers and effects/processors. Personally, I don't use any physical effects/processors and doubt I ever will. UAD sounds great to me and I kinda get the feeling that they're a lot easier to emulate than synthesizers, so that is comforting enough to stay software.
But for physical instruments, I used to hate using them until I figured out how to CORRECTLY use them. By using your DAW to compensate in the MIDI track for latency. Once I figured that out, every synth I had became like a physical VSTi. It's awesome!
I don't use any software instruments (as of today), but if you do go that route, I'd say 1st: BUY THE SOFTWARE. It's not only to support the company, but if you actually buy the software, you'll be a lot more likely to actually use it, abuse it, learn it, and won't be overwhelmed with all the (free/warez/cracked) VSTis you can get your hands on.
Second, all the physical instruments you have now suck balls, so sell them. But you still need at least one real instruments because software just doesn't cut it if you want any sort of edgy (out of the box) sound. If I was forced to have only a single instrument, it would be the Nord Lead 3. So I say either get one of those, or if you just want to make some really phat basses, get a Voyager. Use your one instrument and your VSTis to back it up. Nice and simple.
___________________
Youtube || Soundcloud || Synth Patch Banks
|
|
Jul-23-2009 22:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
music2dance2
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
|
|
|
Its all down to what works for you. If your tracks come out how you want them to be, whatever you use, then who's to argue?
|
|
Jul-24-2009 12:58
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:52.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|