quote:

Originally posted by Faj27 nothing about that track is techno. nothing about trance is "groovy"

Well if its not groovy then whats another word for it.

Edit: Also that track definitly has some "techno" structure in it or else its just an electronic abomination that I can not comprehend.

Edit 2: No wait a minute groovy was the word im looking for. Your really good at confusing the shit out of people...

Edit 3: Wait wait I'm not done yet. Heres a very reasonable definition of "groove"

Definition: Musicologists and other scholars began to analyse the concept of "groove" in the 1990s. They have argued that a "groove" is an "understanding of rhythmic patterning" or "feel" and “an intuitive sense" of "a cycle in motion" that emerges from "carefully aligned concurrent rhythmic patterns" that sets in motion dancing or foot-tapping on the part of listeners.

Last edited by TotalDeathXZero on Aug-12-2009 at 21:50

okay you're right about the groove aspect i suppose. i just feel that the genre (especially what you may consider to be 'trance') has greatly removed itself from it's origins as an anti-establishment, additive composition, arpreggiation of hypnosis and groove. yes, trance is a horizontally structured genre, filled with (again) additives and layers of rhythms. it's just that what i've heard for years now is just plain formula and nothing exploratory.

techno, on the other hand, was not created with the same sentiments. the entire approach is completely different to that thought. the tracks, individually, don't need to go anywhere because it's the dj's job to do that. and that track from the OP is not techno.

quote:

Originally posted by Faj27 okay you're right about the groove aspect i suppose. i just feel that the genre (especially what you may consider to be 'trance') has greatly removed itself from it's origins as an anti-establishment, additive composition, arpreggiation of hypnosis and groove. yes, trance is a horizontally structured genre, filled with (again) additives and layers of rhythms. it's just that what i've heard for years now is just plain formula and nothing exploratory. techno, on the other hand, was not created with the same sentiments. the entire approach is completely different to that thought. the tracks, individually, don't need to go anywhere because it's the dj's job to do that. and that track from the OP is not techno.

Hmm very well, Then maybe its just some fucked up collaboration. Maybe a few trance songs were cut out and thrown in there. Idk I mean after listening to it more than once you realize it doesn't seem very right.

Very nice detailed explanation btw. Something very reasonable to agree with indeed.

why are u even talking about this

lol @ getting owned by the_voice

___________________

OMG OMG A NEW MIX

quote:

Originally posted by Seppuku lol @ getting owned by the_voice

well its just a home made track made on fruity loops i just dont understand why any one wana talk about it

quote:

Originally posted by the_voice well its just a home made track made on fruity loops i just dont understand why any one wana talk about it

because some people have areas of music they like to discuss.