 |
|
|
|
 |
johno27
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: jhb
|
|
|
You might want to try a Dynamic EQ. You can have it triggered by the pitch of the bass note that causes the excessive resonance, and have it apply a cut at that same point. You could achieve the same with using a normal EQ and automation. This is the way I do it and they way I know most pro's would too... there's no big secret. Sometimes with some bass lines it wont be necessary at all, but in terms of engineering that's the way a sonic problem like that would be addressed.
|
|
Sep-08-2009 16:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
johno27
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: jhb
|
|
|
To add to what I posted,
It is very important to pick the right sounds in the first place, and ones that work well with your pattern and key choice.
It often helps to layer bass sounds, or when using multiple oscillators on a synth have one osc an octave up or down. Experiment to find a sweet spot where you have enough harmonic content, the punch from being in the right frequency range and not being too low or muddy.
Sampling bass patches can work very well as previously mentioned as it ensures that every note played is essentially using the same "source" audio. IE: There is no shift in oscillators phase/modulations etc. So by having that full re-trigger the transient of the bass sound will be consistent. Once again this isn't a golden rule but yet another technique to try.
Also remember with bass lines that when layering you have basically 2 options :
1) layering using the same pattern (IE: changing the nature of the sound of you bass.. by adding in harmonics and complexity you might not get from a single patch).
and 2) applying different patterns to the layers. This might include some of the effect of 1 but is more likely done to create a groove/roll in the low end. Perhaps a simple off beat sub bass combined with a faster 1/16th note mid-bass patern.
Another thing I've also stopped doing is making bass sounds 100% mono.. don't sacrifice your bass sounds by making the entire channel mono. Rather post-process say <60hz into mono and leave the highs there. This lets you add some stereo delay etc, but in a range that won't be problematic with vinyl cutters or subs.
|
|
Sep-08-2009 16:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
cryophonik
Boom shanka

Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Elk Grove, CA USA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Richard Butler
One guy on there called serafim says he's only been producing 1 year and already he's just been signed, so I must be a slow learner I guess. |
I wouldn't use that as your measuring stick for several reasons. First, getting signed is not a very high hurdle these days, so that's not necessarily an indication of one's talent in and of itself. Second, some people just have a knack for picking up music production despite having little experience or formal training, whereas others have to work harder at it. And, for all we know, that guy has 18 hours in a day to produce, whereas our schedules may only allow for 1 or 2 hours per day or whatever, etc. So, in other words, don't look at other people's successes as your failure.
___________________
cryophonik.com | facebook | soundcloud
Sonar Platinum | Ableton Live 9 | Logic Pro X | Access Virus TI2 Keyboard | Kurzweil PC3X | Nord Lead 4R | NI Maschine
|
|
Sep-09-2009 23:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
Tarpex
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Kamnik, Slovenia
|
|
|
Check the meters on your bass track. If they're solid, then it's either the speakers / your room / whatever.
Otherwise, you have to realize that lower the frequency, less sonic energy coming out as volume there will be, so learn to use compressors. Properly.
Think that's the key, since you said you've tried different compressors and you'd still get fucked over.
Set a really low threshold, 4:1 ratio, hard knee, lowest attack and shortest release, limit to the volume of your least strong note and you'll hear the compressor working hard to keep your bass volume in level at all times; After that you'll get a good impression of what it's doing and work on your settings from there, lowering the ratio, softening up the threshold, knee and so on, it may take a while but then it'll be almost an automated proccess with each track.
The 50-90 hz range is a bitch to control, takes some work but it pays off.
I won't say experiment with settings, since it's bullshit, just try to learn exactly what compressors do, since i'd bet all my money it's poor compression that's screwing your bass.
That's covering one side of the story; the other thing has to be mentioned, since you like to compare side by side with top-produced shit on the market.
You have to realize that the good bass in itself isn't worth jack shit, there's the rest of the track that'll destroy a perfectly good bass.. You have to engineer your tune so all the elements fit with each other, that they complement each other, not fight for sonic space.
Usually the biggest mistake is writing a mello, then browsing some presets on your favorite synth, finding the most awesome sound, and then going to the next mello, and then wondering how the fuck it sounds like crap when you turn the solo key off.
Key here is to find sounds that work well together, and they're usually not the best presets you're listening on solo (I figure you're not that much experienced, so let's keep the synthesis out of the debate, no offense intended!), then incorporate the sounds in the track sonically, EQ accordingly, then analyze, how much dynamics, if any, does the sound need? How will it fit with master compression/limiting in the end?
It's a lot of things to talk about, just try to concentrate on compressing your bass right and not drowning it with other sounds in the mix 
___________________
www.myspace.com/retrackd
|
|
Sep-09-2009 23:11
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:09.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|