|
| quote: | Originally posted by pmoisse
^Hit Fernie, Kicking Horse or Revelstoke instead of Whistler. Way more powder  |
I've heard good things about all of those places. The only problem is getting to those places; they're all located in the middle of nowhere, and flights to Calgary are expensive and arrivals are at weird times. I can get on a $300 flight at 5pm from Newark going to Seattle and be in whistler by 2-3 am, not losing any boarding time because of travel. Plus, the whistler scene is a huge bonus!
EDIT - oh yeah, whistler is also good because if the powder isn't there, they have a sick park. I know all too well about planning snowboarding trips during dry spells, so i like to go to places with some diversity. FYI - The only park better than Whistler's park is Mammoth mountains's (Cali) park.
| quote: | Originally posted by pmoisse
I hear what you're saying about the winter olympics, but hell, south America and New Zealand have some amazing skiing. With a bit of construction work they could make a hockey arena or two, bobsled run and ski jump thing and off we go. It shouldn't be limited to the north, thought history does reinforce this. |
amazing skiing doesn't make for amazing facilities. The south american ski resorts have shitty amenities. That makes for great skiing for those who are there, but it is a terrible revenue driver. NZ also has some shitty ski areas. NZ is better known for the backcountry than the resorts.
Last edited by jerZ07002 on Oct-04-2009 at 04:43
|