|
| quote: | Originally posted by MarkT
the implication is that TA is full of brilliant economists and historians while Galbraith is a hack. take from that what you will 
correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it a particular type of spending that Keynes advocated, namely on 'things' (to be overly simplistic) or things that provided future returns? e.g. investing in infrastructure, education, etc? the idea being that doing so is not merely short term relief or band-aid solution, but rather provides lasting future returns in addition to having an immediate impact (e.g. on employment levels, which has obvious spinoffs benefits)
point being that to simply say "during a recession, deficit = bad" is ignoring the nature of that spending. |
too bad ehealth, consultants, foreign junkets and god knows what other waste going on doesnt return results....
And how bad is it when the forecast from this year goes from 5 billion to 24 billion in 8 months??? amazing.... until now the record deficit was 12.4 billion under bob rae. The liberals have doubled that within months!!!
|