|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
I'm skeptical about the effect of all this screen reading on long-term eyesight. Computers haven't even been around long enough to collect good data on that, and the Kindle seems 10x worse. |
Screens have changed so much since we were kids, though. Maybe a specific kind of screen did have a hazardous effect on my sight, but how is it possible to trace back what monitor was responsible for that?
| quote: | Originally posted by get nyce
i work in the publishing field and ebook development, the ebook readers (sony and kindle) were the two major pioneers in the field. I bought a kindle for my mother who loves it, the nook is behind and has always been behind. BNN's presence in the technology advancement field for international standards has been subpar with subpar development teams. They are a great "retailer" but are not a leading technological retailer like Amazon who came first into the market over the net.
I would go kindle because I know how far BNN is behind, I can't say much more other then that (NDA) and have worked on pilot programs to bring BNN up to speed with their web-cart development and digital search programs (similar to Amazon's Search Inside the Book and Google's Print Partner Program).
Want something different then go Nook, want something mainstream with a vastly larger digital library and competitive pricing plans go Kindle. Steer clear of Sony as they've (like they always do) gone proprietary in the format war. |
Sorry, I completely missed your post. Thanks for your input, I didn't even know Sony had already released their e-book reader already (I thought they were still working on the project).
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|