Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Hijacked a thread and want a larger opinion on the virtual machine topic for DAWs
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Robby Rox
I wanted the VM to test software on, but would never have it booted when I was making music (which is what I posted in my thread and what nighshift commented about).


VM's are excellent for testing software, just dont expect to get great performance unless you have a monster host machine. When I say monster, I mean a server-class machine, especially if you want to run multiple VM's simultaneously. We use them at work to test software installation packages. Hyper-V is really top notch, but it costs. The nice thing is you can save snapshots of the machines in specific states and revert the machine back to that state with the click of a button.

You also have the option of using differencing disks where you can have a base install on one VHD (virtual hard disk) and then add another VHD on top of that to store any changes. You make the base VHD read-only and then add your differencing VHD. That way you always have a base install ready to go and if you ever screw up the snapshots you can revert to the base install by just deleting the differencing disk. The base VHD is also good for cloning a single VHD for use among multiple VM's. Windows 7 takes this one step further by adding Undo Disks, which basically do this behind the scenes for you.

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Robby Rox
But I think the most important thing is I find out what hes using and then you can give me better direction. I will not have the VM booted at anytime when I'm making music, so it would be under those terms. Which is what I originally asked.. and I'm still honestly not sure why people answered in reference to having the VM booted.

I'm sorry but I thought I clearly stated that. Just nevermind. I'm going to find out one way or another I guess..


Its cool. My guess is that he is using an application-based virtual host, because those are generally inexpensive and consumer level. If that is the case you take no performance hit when the VM host software is not running but they perform slower than enterprise-level VM hosts that run as a service.

quote:
Originally posted by atxbigballer1
U don't need that VM shit!


I agree with this guy that you may be better off using a multi-boot scenario. The only problem is that you'd miss the snapshot feature, which is extremely useful. It all depends on your goals, but in your case, I think you'd be just fine with a multi-boot machine.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 05:33  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Robby Rox
Longterm Newbie



Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Tiestoland

Thanks Eric this clarified things really well.

I do want to mention however he works for management at AT&T (couldn't tell you name of the branch) and gets free lifetime subscriptions to lots (or actually I think almost all the stuff he uses) He commonly gets extra copies and passes them off to family.

I'm honestly not sure if this is an extra copy or if hes using his own but price has never been an issue for most the software he uses. Its one benefit I suppose of having a massive computer geek in your family. Would rather not get into the ethical part though..


___________________
Sequencers: FL Studio 9XXL & Reason 3.
Main Synth Bass GTs - Pro-53, V-Station, Sytrus, Subtractor, Trilian, Blue, Sylenth & Z3ta.
Main Synth Lead/Pad GTs - Z3ta, Sytrus, Sylenth, Vangard, Albino & Nexus.
Main FXs GTs - Waves Plugins, Soundtoys, Volcano, FL Native FX.
Hardware - Truths, Echo Audiofire, Virus Snow, & Novation Xio Midi-Synth.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 05:39  South Africa
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Robby Rox Click here to Send DJ Robby Rox a Private Message Add DJ Robby Rox to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Robby Rox
Thanks Eric this clarified things really well.

I do want to mention however he works for management at AT&T (couldn't tell you name of the branch) and gets free lifetime subscriptions to lots (or actually I think almost all the stuff he uses) He commonly gets extra copies and passes them off to family.

I'm honestly not sure if this is an extra copy or if hes using his own but price has never been an issue for most the software he uses. Its one benefit I suppose of having a massive computer geek in your family. Would rather not get into the ethical part though..


He probably has an MSDN Volume License from AT&T, which is what I have. Legally you are only allowed to use these licenses for development purposes, but many people use them in "production" scenarios, illegally. Strictly speaking, what you are doing is not considered "development", so it'd technically be a violation of the MSDN EULA. Microsoft has started to crack down on this a bit, by limiting the number of product keys you are allowed to request for a particular application, server or OS.

In your case if you really want to try this and get the best performance out of it, that means Windows 7 Enterprise for you. Windows 7 Ent runs a "version" of Hyper V that allows direct access to the hardware if your processor supports it. It even includes a "Windows XP Mode" that runs pretty well.

Most server class machine in the past 2 years support it and there are several recent workstation class machines (such as the Dell Optiplex) that are including support for it. You'll need to go into your BIOS and look for a setting that says "Virtualization" or "Hyper-V" to see if your processor supports it. You can also check your manufacturer support website. If you dont have the hardware processor support you can't install it, so in that case you'll need to look at application-based VM hosts such as VMware fusion. or Microsoft Virtual PC.

The only other option is Windows Server 2008 w/ Hyper V and I would not recommend that for you. Server operating systems are setup by default to give priority to background services and applications, and you need resource priority to be given to foreground processes. You can change this behavior, but its not always easy and often require dangerous registry tweaks and obscure changes to things like DCOM Configuration. If you were to do this, you are basically turning a server OS into a workstation OS, so what's the point? Might as well install the workstation OS in the first place.

Last edited by Eric J on Dec-23-2009 at 06:04

Old Post Dec-23-2009 05:47  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Chronosis
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Málaga

I use VM's for everything else besides music. Keeps my main OS fast and clean for running DAW. I also shut down the VM server from taking resources when producing.


___________________
Latest tracks:
Come little children (Jehuti remix)
Connected - Change [progressive]
Connected - Glorafin [drum'n'bass]
Connected - A Year Goes By [progressive]


The point isn't to "get out of your body", it's to bring awareness to your consciousness while you're experiencing another reality.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 11:21  Finland
Click Here to See the Profile for Chronosis Click here to Send Chronosis a Private Message Add Chronosis to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Nightshift
...Ninja Business...



Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento, California

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Robby Rox
When nighshift made that comment I thought he was talking about the scenario of using them seperately, not together. (with VM being booted just for chat/surfing then shutting it down for music production) which is what I honestly think he still was talking about lol.


this is precisely what i was talking about. and it seems the results are quite good:

quote:
Originally posted by Chronosis
I use VM's for everything else besides music. Keeps my main OS fast and clean for running DAW. I also shut down the VM server from taking resources when producing.


___________________

@Soundcloud


:::OUT NOW!:::
Garrido & Skehan ft. Erin - Waiting For You (Nightshift Remix)
Elvin Ong - Motion (Nightshift Remix)
Tidal Forces - Machine Blue (Nightshift Remix)
quote:
Originally posted by meriter
Your primary focus should be making good music. That's all. No one gives a shit how you do it. And the people that do are fags.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 17:03  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Nightshift Click here to Send Nightshift a Private Message Visit Nightshift's homepage! Add Nightshift to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Zak McKracken
Trance



Registered: Jun 2003
Location:

i use VM-Ware at work. it sucks performance wise. its great for alot of other things but for audio id never try it. for one USB-ports and shit are troublesome in VM-Ware as u have to route them to what OS u want to use them on. Just stay the hell away from this.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 17:16 
Click Here to See the Profile for Zak McKracken Click here to Send Zak McKracken a Private Message Add Zak McKracken to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe

quote:
Originally posted by palm
i use VM-Ware at work. it sucks performance wise.



VMWare is practically transparent, performance-wise, assuming you've actually got virtualization-capable hardware. Are you running it on some shitty desktop machine? Or worse, a laptop?

Not that I would use it for production, or on a home machine at all. I thought this ancient idea of keeping a machine "clean" for production "performance" died with Windows 98 along with all the "tweaking" guides. With UAC and quad-core processors and 4 GB of RAM, if you are really seeing performance problems then you've probably managed to get 27 worms from all your cr4xx0r3d software and need to just reformat.


___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

Old Post Dec-23-2009 18:24  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for DigiNut Click here to Send DigiNut a Private Message Add DigiNut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Specimen303
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2005
Location:

I have vmware workstation in my laptop (with vista 32-bit home) and it works just fine. It's currently running windows server 2008 r2 and sql server 2008 without any performance problems - studying for the sql certification exam.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 20:13  Finland
Click Here to See the Profile for Specimen303 Click here to Send Specimen303 a Private Message Add Specimen303 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Robby Rox
Longterm Newbie



Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Tiestoland

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
[FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#99CCEE]

VMWare is practically transparent, performance-wise, assuming you've actually got virtualization-capable hardware. Are you running it on some shitty desktop machine? Or worse, a laptop?



Just want to get an idea if you think my desktop is capable. I built it myself, 500gb HD, Core2DuoE7400 2.8ghz, 4GB RAM, Asus Mobo, Windows XP, can give you more specs if you need.

I mean that should be capable right? Or does the hardware need to be completely different? Like manufactured specifically for VMware?


___________________
Sequencers: FL Studio 9XXL & Reason 3.
Main Synth Bass GTs - Pro-53, V-Station, Sytrus, Subtractor, Trilian, Blue, Sylenth & Z3ta.
Main Synth Lead/Pad GTs - Z3ta, Sytrus, Sylenth, Vangard, Albino & Nexus.
Main FXs GTs - Waves Plugins, Soundtoys, Volcano, FL Native FX.
Hardware - Truths, Echo Audiofire, Virus Snow, & Novation Xio Midi-Synth.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 20:14  South Africa
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Robby Rox Click here to Send DJ Robby Rox a Private Message Add DJ Robby Rox to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Robby Rox
Longterm Newbie



Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Tiestoland

quote:
Originally posted by Specimen303
I have vmware workstation in my laptop (with vista 32-bit home) and it works just fine. It's currently running windows server 2008 r2 and sql server 2008 without any performance problems - studying for the sql certification exam.


Haha a laptop eh?

If you're not having issues on a laptop I think I should be fine then with my setup, thanks!


___________________
Sequencers: FL Studio 9XXL & Reason 3.
Main Synth Bass GTs - Pro-53, V-Station, Sytrus, Subtractor, Trilian, Blue, Sylenth & Z3ta.
Main Synth Lead/Pad GTs - Z3ta, Sytrus, Sylenth, Vangard, Albino & Nexus.
Main FXs GTs - Waves Plugins, Soundtoys, Volcano, FL Native FX.
Hardware - Truths, Echo Audiofire, Virus Snow, & Novation Xio Midi-Synth.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 20:15  South Africa
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Robby Rox Click here to Send DJ Robby Rox a Private Message Add DJ Robby Rox to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Specimen303
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2005
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Robby Rox
Haha a laptop eh?

If you're not having issues on a laptop I think I should be fine then with my setup, thanks!


Well yes. I have about one and a half year old laptop with turion x2 and 4gb of ram. It's not the fastest in the planet but it gets things done.

Old Post Dec-23-2009 20:31  Finland
Click Here to See the Profile for Specimen303 Click here to Send Specimen303 a Private Message Add Specimen303 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Aesthetic
- ---(ps3.addicted)--- -



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: somewhere between the melody and the pads

I just completed a vmware course last week and the instructor basically said you can virtualize any machines but the ones that don't work well are machines that require very little latency responses.

So. lol. I love you Robbyrox, merry xmas mate.

PS. Looking at it the other way, you could use your Host OS to run your DAW and music shit, and your Guest OS to run all the other internet crap.. that could work I suppose

Last edited by Aesthetic on Dec-23-2009 at 22:03

Old Post Dec-23-2009 21:47 
Click Here to See the Profile for Aesthetic Click here to Send Aesthetic a Private Message Add Aesthetic to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Hijacked a thread and want a larger opinion on the virtual machine topic for DAWs
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackUnknown Japanese Trance [2004] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackViframa - "Reflect to My Dreams" [2006]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:55.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!