What's the pitch resolution on the cdj's like. Couldn't find anything on their site.
To be honest. I can see these doing quite well.
Personally i love the styling. I think they look a lot better than the 200's and 400's. They're clean, simple no frills. No flashy colour (400's) or silly jog wheel (200's)..
I know you all like your high end equipment etc but these could be a really nice cheaper option. Plus the fact that rekordbox could be used might allow you to program your tunes./set a little and then move on to a clubs 2000's when you're playing out.
I dunno i think you're all being a little harsh.
Just my 2c.
Mar-24-2010 02:52
skip
a.k.a. skip2
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else
Looks like they hired someone from Gemini to design these.
Last edited by Zak McKracken on Mar-24-2010 at 22:07
Mar-24-2010 21:55
farris
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: NL
quote:
Originally posted by n3lly
What's the pitch resolution on the cdj's like. Couldn't find anything on their site.
If you look closely on the displays, the left one shows 0.15% and the right one 0.02%.
So likely to be 0.02 on 6% range and 0.05 on 10?
EDIT: This pic shows a better display. So, 0.02% on 6: CDJ-350
Mar-25-2010 21:23
n3lly
www.n3lly.com
Registered: May 2003
Location: Dublin
quote:
Originally posted by farris
If you look closely on the displays, the left one shows 0.15% and the right one 0.02%.
So likely to be 0.02 on 6% range and 0.05 on 10?
EDIT: This pic shows a better display. So, 0.02% on 6: CDJ-350
Nice one.. That's pretty decent
Hmmm I'm wondering if these would be a good match up for controlling Traktor/Serato control discs. Could be a cheaper way of getting a deck with .02 resolution for controlling TSP.
