quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Whats even more fucked is that certain states in Australia now allow mistresses to make claims over their partner’s assets. Like, wtf? Homos bringing about the decay of civilisation.

If they're treating it like a common law marriage wouldn't that constitute de facto bigamy? Or are the laws there a little more loose, if you know what I mean?

___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012

I feel like that won't affect people who are married to someone else.
Will it? Otherwise that's just stupid.

___________________
Quarantine Classics Brunello di Montalcino (In Transit) Edition [Progressive Classics] (August 2020)
Quarantine Classics - Puligny-Montrachet Edition [Progressive Classics] (April 2020)
What Is Progressive Anyways? [Progressive House Classics] (November 2019)

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker If they're treating it like a common law marriage wouldn't that constitute de facto bigamy? Or are the laws there a little more loose, if you know what I mean?

Haha, good point! Fucking ridiculous though.

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker If they're treating it like a common law marriage wouldn't that constitute de facto bigamy? Or are the laws there a little more loose, if you know what I mean?

In Australia it's not the laws that are loose my friend


This law is fair as long as women can be held just as accountable as men. Although it's a sorry state of affairs I must say.

___________________
Nothing to see here