|
i actuall did alot of research on this matter becuase i was choosing between the vrm-10 and the xone 62.
vrm-10 sounds really good and i thought it would be a good complement to my valve amps. they also use penny&giles faders so the faders [and rotary option faders] are silky smooth and very long.
adressing the stanton reputation and build quality issue: i think the vrm-10 is built by another company for staonton. the quality is excellent.
you get the vrm-10 for its effects, frankly
when it came down to the line, i decided that i dont want effects. i thought filters were more elegant so i decided on getting the a&h.
alittle research for you:
http://www.futureproducers.com/foru...10&pagenumber=2
| quote: | Originally posted by Dj Thy
Frankly it's one of the greatest sounding mixers I've ever heard. It really comes close to Xones (which are in my opinion still better), but the price tag is very very hefty.
Faders are really nice, sound quality is great, effects and filter are good. And of course the parametric EQ is really handy.
The metering system takes some time adapting to (gives and indication about average volume, so you want those meters to slowly hover around the optimal range).
The only thing that's weird on this mixer is the output voltage. They use strange references.
You see, most consumer devices (read budget mixers) have an output of -10 dBV. Pro devices work on +4dBu.
On the VRM-10 you can choose, but their references are 0dBu and +6dBu, so for installators it may seem weird, most pro amps are designed for +4dBu. So either the amp will work at high amplifications (knobs turned all the way up) or in the case of +6dBu output, you'll have to take care not to overload the amp.
As for famous dj's... Tiesto uses a VRM-10. He doubted between this mixer and a Xone. But in his opinion the EQ slope of the A&H was too steep (he's got a point at a certain extent, but then he should have let it modify like Hawtin did). |
http://www.futureproducers.com/foru...highlight=vrm10
| quote: | Originally posted by Sniff
Anyways i had it for about a month and that month was a great. The mixer performed well, sounded amazing, and just had so many *useful* features effects etc that i dont think it would be possible to outgrow the mixer or ever truly beat the learning curve.
I love the eq section, while though it doesnt have full kills, it has the parametric sweep on the mid which allows you to pull stuff right out into the mix. The curves were really sweet. Not like the sledgehammer i had to go back to.
The mixer required a very precise style, between the eq and the gains it is easy to clip, so you get very exact, and it shows when you play on something else.
anyways onece i get it back i will write a longer description, but from what i have seen so far, its all good.
It just feels good. It is impossible for anyone, dj, non-dj, gear whore or purist to approach it without touching it and going oi!thats nice. I never got a chance to install the rotaries though they finally arrived (ouch duty hurts) so i really have something to look forward to.
[...]
i dont know how useful it is, but the unit does have a completely assignable cross fader - any channel can be assiged to either side and an adjustable curve, and the fader is very smooth. though very long.
all the faders have almost no resistance, if you prop the unit up a too much of an angle, gravity takes the faders down.
trippy, frighteningly smooth. |
and from private messages:
| quote: | from sniff
As for the stanton Build quality is phenomenal. The unit will never die thru use. Sound is remarkable, as i said, we put it up against a xone 64 and it rocked, the sound is very warm and deep, the eqs are sweet as well, but there is much you can do with the board, that i am still riding the learning curve. |
___________________
J a d e dB e a t s . n e t
|