quote:

Originally posted by Mad for Brad yes but any good producer will add just a little extra to the second iteration.

Sometimes it doesn't sound like enough. Maybe that's just me though.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_alfi change your avatar for fucks sake.

Check out this tune

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7_M8exMgTo

one big crescendo. It just keeps building till the climax. And that is how it is done.

quote:

Originally posted by Beatflux Sometimes it doesn't sound like enough. Maybe that's just me though.

like I said, it might not be. But that is a poor decision by the producer. Most people won't care.

quote:

Originally posted by Mad for Brad Check out this tune http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7_M8exMgTo one big crescendo. It just keeps building till the climax. And that is how it is done.

Pretty good tune. But I wouldn't call it one big crescendo...I can't think of a good example at the moment.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_alfi change your avatar for fucks sake.

tech house and tech trance first came to mind thoe i think the op was gearing his question round new ways of making tracks rather then clever arragement.

i think producers like timo mass oftern think outside the box and trifonic

___________________
http://soundcloud.com/
owien-us

Not really related to form,

I don't really see people working with 3/4 time, 5/4 time, or any other variants.

I can imagine that being a nightmare for DJ's, and for the unitiated listener can be hard to appreciate.

Also, something as simple as not having the clap,snare, or hit on the third beat is something I have yet to see happen more often.