|
*spoken as clearly and slowly as possible.
NO FUCKING SHIT you dumb obtuse dodobrained fuck.
Please stick to what you know best, helping people buy an interface.
First, Cryo never said "native indian" you did. He said "we call them indigenous people or native americans out of respect", which we DO NOT.
But apparently he has very sparse cultural knowledge as what he said was both obnoxious and conceited.
He SAID, that G-Con was "WAY" off base and all he did was use a shortened version of "Native Indian". Explain to me how leaving one word out is WAY off base? Because we have Indians from india too? It was "WAY" more on point then cryo implying all us Americans do is watch football and stuff our fat faces.
And I'm sure not a single person who read G-Cons post assumed he was talking about
>>HINDU<< Indians. Not to mention you don't call hindus Indians either, you call them fucking hindus. They don't study indianism. It’s a loose term that applies to more than 1 group of people.
Lastly, I work in therapy for shits sake and I know damn well what they prefer to be called. They, "indigenous" people prefer to be called either "American Indians" or "Indians" by itself, which is precisely what G-Con said. Thus, cyro AND you are both so far off fucking base you're standing in Pluto right now. There is no single group of people called "Indians". And not all Indians are hindu, same way not all Indians are native Indians.
Now please, leave me the fuck alone. You are both wrong. And cryos attempt to come off knowledgeable obviously backfired as he has no remote idea wtf he or you is talking about. Also, this consensus was done in 1985 by the US goverment, and ALL of the respondents were Native Indians. So HOW THE FUCK (cryo) is it "disrespectful" to call them Indian when they **PREFER** either that or "Native Indian"? (as directly reported by THEM in the consensus) Neither one of you are making any sense right now. Go polish up on your history skills or read the latest consensus.
|