Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > I dont get it....
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
stewart.m
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Mar 2011
Location: south west of england

quote:
Originally posted by Kysora


that's just fucking stupid, though. or genius, depending on how much you care about the business end of things.
a bit of both i think

Old Post Sep-22-2011 20:47  England
Click Here to See the Profile for stewart.m Click here to Send stewart.m a Private Message Add stewart.m to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SystematicX1
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Washington Coast

Best example I can give is the recent Tiesto - Work Hard Play Hard contest. Tiesto gave out 5 or 6 stems [cant remember] to remix.
Out of the top 10 submits, NONE of them utilized all stems given [which btw were NOT of the original track], only 6 of them used the vocal stem given, that's it.
If I were to do a contest of the sort wouldn't it be easier to just say "Here is the vocal track, put this to your best song you can create"?
Why even bother with stabs or bassline or drum tracks.
To me it seems as if the producer is really trying to say.."I have lost all physical creativity and I need you to help me with ideas"?

Seriously, maybe it is difficult to understand.

In another example of the way I try to approach these contests.
When ZTrip did his remake years ago of Rush's Tom Sawyer, I instantly thought NOOOO!!! Hes gonna shred this classic song for the sake of "creativity". However, when I listened to it I was surprised to find that he took 99.5% of the original song, tweaked them and rearranged the composition. In essence, he "remixed" the song AND kept integrity of the original. He didnt come up with a completely different piece and in the end paid homage to Rush.
Why isnt it more like that? Why cant these contests respect the original song and artist by keeping the integrity of the song but altering it in a manner that still makes it a unique song?


___________________
Phil

_____________________________________

_____________________________________

Old Post Sep-22-2011 21:29  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for SystematicX1 Click here to Send SystematicX1 a Private Message Add SystematicX1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
stewart.m
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Mar 2011
Location: south west of england

quote:
Originally posted by scorpradio
Best example I can give is the recent Tiesto - Work Hard Play Hard contest. Tiesto gave out 5 or 6 stems [cant remember] to remix.
Out of the top 10 submits, NONE of them utilized all stems given [which btw were NOT of the original track], only 6 of them used the vocal stem given, that's it.
If I were to do a contest of the sort wouldn't it be easier to just say "Here is the vocal track, put this to your best song you can create"?
Why even bother with stabs or bassline or drum tracks.
To me it seems as if the producer is really trying to say.."I have lost all physical creativity and I need you to help me with ideas"?

Seriously, maybe it is difficult to understand.

In another example of the way I try to approach these contests.
When ZTrip did his remake years ago of Rush's Tom Sawyer, I instantly thought NOOOO!!! Hes gonna shred this classic song for the sake of "creativity". However, when I listened to it I was surprised to find that he took 99.5% of the original song, tweaked them and rearranged the composition. In essence, he "remixed" the song AND kept integrity of the original. He didnt come up with a completely different piece and in the end paid homage to Rush.
Why isnt it more like that? Why cant these contests respect the original song and artist by keeping the integrity of the song but altering it in a manner that still makes it a unique song?
because it dont make money sad but true

Old Post Sep-22-2011 21:33  England
Click Here to See the Profile for stewart.m Click here to Send stewart.m a Private Message Add stewart.m to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Kysora
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Hampshire, IL

quote:
Originally posted by scorpradio
Why isnt it more like that? Why cant these contests respect the original song and artist by keeping the integrity of the song but altering it in a manner that still makes it a unique song?


Why do you care so much? And why do you think what you just said here is impossible unless you take parts directly from the song you're remixing?

You really aren't making sense.

Old Post Sep-23-2011 00:09  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Kysora Click here to Send Kysora a Private Message Add Kysora to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
skyhunter
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2010
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by scorpradio
Best example I can give is the recent Tiesto - Work Hard Play Hard contest. Tiesto gave out 5 or 6 stems [cant remember] to remix.
Out of the top 10 submits, NONE of them utilized all stems given [which btw were NOT of the original track], only 6 of them used the vocal stem given, that's it.
If I were to do a contest of the sort wouldn't it be easier to just say "Here is the vocal track, put this to your best song you can create"?
Why even bother with stabs or bassline or drum tracks.
To me it seems as if the producer is really trying to say.."I have lost all physical creativity and I need you to help me with ideas"?

Seriously, maybe it is difficult to understand.

In another example of the way I try to approach these contests.
When ZTrip did his remake years ago of Rush's Tom Sawyer, I instantly thought NOOOO!!! Hes gonna shred this classic song for the sake of "creativity". However, when I listened to it I was surprised to find that he took 99.5% of the original song, tweaked them and rearranged the composition. In essence, he "remixed" the song AND kept integrity of the original. He didnt come up with a completely different piece and in the end paid homage to Rush.
Why isnt it more like that? Why cant these contests respect the original song and artist by keeping the integrity of the song but altering it in a manner that still makes it a unique song?


Cause apparently people like me who like to mangle and glitch samples from the original track into an entirely new genre have no creativity.


___________________
Tranceport is the best album ever....

There is nothing wrong with being musically diverse.

My Soundcloud

Old Post Sep-23-2011 06:00  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for skyhunter Click here to Send skyhunter a Private Message Add skyhunter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > I dont get it....
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): « 1 [2]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackUnknown Track # 2 [2005] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackSteve Thomas - Millenium [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!