|
Well I really don't disagree with you, I just value being relatively ignorant at times. It's not always a bad thing, because it can really help you appreciate things you've never noticed before, natural things.
It's funny that Intellekshual mentioned not having running water or lights at home, because I did live like that for a few months. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't some third world simulation I opted in to get to know my self better - we could drive to 'town' and buy fresh water and such, so I was very much still living like whitey. But falling asleep each night when the lights went out, not having to tolerate the din of cathode ray hums or the flickering of liquid crystals... there was an austerity to it. I taught myself how to read again! And how to walk about and not feel like I was missing something at home or that I had to be back by a certain time to see this show or that.
I know this isn't precisely what the topic is addressing, but I don't believe it's terribly unrelated. Attention to pop culture, even if its of an all-too-common dismissive nature, is still attention, and can most often only serve to distract someone from things that are much better, more fulfilling. Balance is everything, of course, I am completely with you there, but imbalance is important to experience as well, and it's not always a detraction to oneself.
Though something that hasn't been addressed is just how one defines what 'popular culture' is. I think it's just whatever is on primetime television or A-list celebrity news. But it's obviously a very vague term, as popularity, itself, is such a very amorphous thing.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|