Originally posted by meriter
get a camera that can save images as RAW
So, all DSLRs?
___________________
Nov-30-2012 22:22
meriter
-
Registered: May 2009
Location:
well i mean it might not be necessary, I got a camera in 2005 for $200 that takes pics I'm very happy with, but I'm not like a wildlife photographer
EDIT: unless you count looney's girlfriend as wildlife
Last edited by meriter on Nov-30-2012 at 22:31
Nov-30-2012 22:24
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2010
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by meriter
I've been meaning to give you shit about the quality of your photos for a while now, taking studio pics of thousands of dollars worth of gear with a shitty camera phone has a certain irony to it
Anyway all I can contribute really is get a camera that can save images as RAW, you probably don't need to spend anywhere near 2 grand though, I guess it depends on what you want to shoot
you wouldn't believe the phone I have either. It is ghetto. I couldn't handle the iphone. I need buttons that you can push. As far as studio pics, not really that keen on letting people know what they can steel. I post them when i get something and my girlfriend doesn't care about it and i need a friend,.
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Warsaw, Earth, 1 AU
quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
I would love a Polaroid camera, the only camera in the world with unique pictures
___________________
insignificant cor member alliance
Dec-01-2012 20:15
FuzzQi
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: In your face
quote:
Originally posted by aquila
Aim for either the Nikon D5100 or Canon 650D with a twin lens kit. Both cameras are pretty much identical to each other feature-wise and sit perfectly in the midrange group.