Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Don't you live in an apartment though?
I do, but I have a large living room with ample room for a nice setup, and I just got a new 55' LED tv to go with it.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
This isn't about physics, this is about waves.
Dec-04-2012 03:02
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
I do, but I have a large living room with ample room for a nice setup, and I just got a new 55' LED tv to go with it.
Whoa, must be a huge room to fit a 55 foot TV in there
___________________
Dec-04-2012 03:05
srussell0018
Chaostician
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Blumsberg
Well my apartment is the first floor of a house, so it's not small.
Edit: Oh.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
This isn't about physics, this is about waves.
Dec-04-2012 03:10
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
Edit: Oh.
Yeah
___________________
Dec-04-2012 03:13
srussell0018
Chaostician
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Blumsberg
While I was looking at stuff at Best Buy I checked out the Sharp 90" Aquos. That thing is ridiculous. $10,000 too.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
This isn't about physics, this is about waves.
Dec-04-2012 03:14
Lira
Ancient BassAddict
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
My home sound system:
Dec-04-2012 03:14
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
While I was looking at stuff at Best Buy I checked out the Sharp 90" Aquos. That thing is ridiculous. $10,000 too.
Massive
___________________
Dec-04-2012 03:16
WittyHandle
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2008
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
Whoa, must be a huge room to fit a 55 foot TV in there
Dec-04-2012 04:37
srussell0018
Chaostician
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Blumsberg
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
This isn't about physics, this is about waves.
Dec-04-2012 18:57
Trance-M
Since 1994 tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg, Netherlands
quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
I should've thrown some Shaw bate into this thread and said that I really wanted a Bose system because they make the best home audio that money can buy.
My next set probably will have Teufel speakers. But first my 10 years old 32" Philips Matchline tv (DD, 220W, 9 speakers) needs to die, so I can send my Pioneer set (fucking 20 years old) with sound field processor and additional B&W speakers into retirement, as I'm meanwhile convinced it's never going to die.
___________________
Longest (classic) Trance playlist on YouTube (5000 tracks released up to and including 1997), click here
Dec-04-2012 20:33
srussell0018
Chaostician
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Blumsberg
I debated the Bowers & Wilkins front speakers, but after listening to them I liked the MartinLogan better. The B&W is supposed to be unmatched in terms of clarity, but they just didn't have the same power that MartinLogan had. That and they were more expensive.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
This isn't about physics, this is about waves.
Dec-04-2012 20:43
srussell0018
Chaostician
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Blumsberg
You clearly don't know what you're talking about and aren't contributing anything to this thread. Please stop posting in it. The receiver they had in the store setup wasn't a Pioneer receiver, and was about $1,500 by itself, so your argument is retarded. Even with the best receiver they had, MartinLogan still sounded better to me than B&W, but my gut feeling is that you've never heard either one, and are just trying to act like you know something which you really don't.
A 770W Pioneer receiver is more than enough to bring out the full "goodness" in a B&W system.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
This isn't about physics, this is about waves.
