dictators are an easy target. taxes are the real enemy.

quote:

17 US warships now off Syria The U.S. aircraft carrier "Dwight D Eisenhower" has arrived off the shores of Syria. The multipurpose nuclear attack carrier the U.S.S. Dwight D Eisenhower is leading the naval assault group which has arrived in the eastern Mediterranean. It is in close proximity to the coast of Syria. On board the ship are 70 fighter-bombers and a total 8,000 US servicemen. The Dwight D Eisenhower joined the amphibious assault helicopter carrier Iwo Jima, which has been in the area for almost two weeks. In all there are now 17 Amercian warships off the Syrian coast. Voice of Russia, TASS

http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_12_06/1...-now-off-Syria/


History is about to repeat itself all over again.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by Joss Weatherby Except the intelligence here is credible, verifiable by government, military, and civilian sources, almost every nation agrees on it, and there is a massive civil war going on right now.

Sorry I just cannot accept this so called credible intelligence coming from the CIA. They told us the exact same lies over Iraq and made it look extremely credible but every single one of them was a lie. Tell me why we should believe them this time around.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

In Capitalist America, warship made in China.

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer Sorry I just cannot accept this so called credible intelligence coming from the CIA. They told us the exact same lies over Iraq and made it look extremely credible but every single one of them was a lie. Tell me why we should believe them this time around.

How about every other intelligence agency in the west? There is almost universal acceptance that Syria has chemical weapons, deployable chemical weapons.

I'm not saying that they dont have Chemical weapons but they (West) are claming that Syria is about to use them on their own people. I'd like to see evidence of that before the NATO bombing begins.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer I'm not saying that they dont have Chemical weapons but they (West) are claming that Syria is about to use them on their own people. I'd like to see evidence of that before the NATO bombing begins.

No one is claiming preventive action beyond the forces they already have on the ground, which is not only the US but a number of other nations with special operatives acting inside Syria. No one in the west wants the rebels or Assad around CW.

If Syria does use them though, you can bet that everyone and their mom will be on Syria within 36 hours.

quote:

Originally posted by Joss Weatherby If Syria does use them though, you can bet that everyone and their mom will be on Syria within 36 hours.

Exactly! You dont think Assad knows that? Why would he want to use them if knows that it'll be the end of him and his regime?

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer Exactly! You dont think Assad knows that? Why would he want to use them if knows that it'll be the end of him and his regime?

Spite?

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer I'm not saying that they dont have Chemical weapons but they (West) are claming that Syria is about to use them on their own people. I'd like to see evidence of that before the NATO bombing begins.

You can't possibly be supporting the Assad regime can you?


I would definitely rather a nato lead strike than a unilateral US strike.

Last edited by Nrg2Nfinit on Dec-06-2012 at 04:57

I don't support the Assad regime, but I don't support the rebels, either. The U.S. shouldn't get involved in this one. It's far too complicated and murky and both sides are fucking awful. No matter what we do, short of bombing the country to oblivion, Syria is most likely going to be a god damn mess for a long time to come.

NATO should do strategic strikes on Assad's anti-aircraft defenses, send in special forces to destroy or capture the chemical weapons, and then get the fuck out.

___________________
Quarantine Classics Brunello di Montalcino (In Transit) Edition [Progressive Classics] (August 2020)
Quarantine Classics - Puligny-Montrachet Edition [Progressive Classics] (April 2020)
What Is Progressive Anyways? [Progressive House Classics] (November 2019)

quote:

Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit You can't possibly be supporting the Assad regime can you? I would definitely rather a nato lead strike then a unilateral US strike.

This is not about taking sides; it is about going to yet another war based on lies. Getting rid of Syria is strategic move for the U.S. and it has nothing to do with the humanitarian cause. Getting rid of Syria gets them one step closeer to their ultimate goal in aka Iran.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind