Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Multitracking without using a DAW
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
AlphaStarred
-__---__-_-_-_-----_



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY

good point...lol

ok, so can you guys please advise how I'd get started on multitracking into a DAW? i'm thinking it may indeed be the best way to go. I'm using a relatively cheap laptop, so if it's not convenient, I'd rather just maybe buy the Korg D888 and have my mixer outs going into it.

Old Post Apr-01-2016 08:30  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for AlphaStarred Click here to Send AlphaStarred a Private Message Add AlphaStarred to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SystematicX1
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Washington Coast

quote:
Originally posted by AlphaStarred
Yeah, that's what I've always been doing, but why should I use a DAW if I can just record into, say, an 8 or 16-track recorder? Unless you're suggesting I start writing in stems? I'd really rather do everything live, honestly.
Thanks for the tip, but how would I be holding myself back, exactly?


Ok..this is totally my opinion.

"8 or 16-track recorder" ...Tape?
1: Wear and tear
2: Availability to purchase more...tape
3: Quality is warmer (imo) +1 but still see #1 & #2
4: Quality turns into shit unless you are talking DAT (still see #1)

"but why should I use a DAW" "I'd really rather do everything live"
Everything you want to do, you can do better,faster,more accurate and is more forgiving in a live setting with a DAW.
You are able to physically see the wav form in a 2 dimensional setting that allows you to get pin point accuracy.


"how would I be holding myself back, exactly"
How you work on a track. When I was working on analog I liked to just screw around and go with a flow with whatever I was sequencing. I found myself not being able to get a solid composition down because of the limitations to my hardware although the repetition was spot on for trance (at the time) /grins. Needless to say, those tracks took forever to finish.
Effects were limited to what onboard gear I had,which wasn't much.
Unless you had the bucks to shell out for another piece of hardware
Needless to say (Im speaking solely for) Ableton. The native effects rack has over 200 effects at your disposal. Not all are great but probably alot better than the standard.

I also found alot of times due to the weak polyphony(32)my song would cut out or act weird If my sequences started stacking to much. With a good computer, this will never happen again. So, you mentioned you were on a laptop...hmm, you will need some decent specs

In a nutshell, you can do all this still,live with a DAW. Your tracks will be better, the pace at which you create your tracks will be faster and your ability to manage your music will be better.
But still your laptop.....hmm


___________________
Phil

_____________________________________

_____________________________________

Last edited by SystematicX1 on Apr-01-2016 at 09:22

Old Post Apr-01-2016 09:13  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for SystematicX1 Click here to Send SystematicX1 a Private Message Add SystematicX1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Woony
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Berlin

Robert Hood still uses a digital Tascam recorder - it's obviously not as flexible/powerful as a DAW but you get hardware and simplicity and none of the issues with DATs/old hardware.

http://tascam.com/products/mtr_digital_portastudio/


___________________
June 2018 mix

Old Post Apr-01-2016 13:14 
Click Here to See the Profile for Woony Click here to Send Woony a Private Message Add Woony to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
AlphaStarred
-__---__-_-_-_-----_



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY

quote:
Originally posted by Woony
Robert Hood still uses a digital Tascam recorder - it's obviously not as flexible/powerful as a DAW but you get hardware and simplicity and none of the issues with DATs/old hardware.

http://tascam.com/products/mtr_digital_portastudio/


Hah! And people here were making fun of me for using a Tascam. I've always been using a DP-004, and was actually thinking last night of saving for one of the higher end ones (e.g. DP-24SD, so I can actually multitrack live).

If I'm actually able to buy something like the DP-24SD, I really don't see the purpose of using a DAW. Unless you guys can convince me otherwise.

Old Post Apr-01-2016 15:14  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for AlphaStarred Click here to Send AlphaStarred a Private Message Add AlphaStarred to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Woony
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Berlin

I mean, it's hard to argue that DAW is better objectively but in the end making music comes down to what you're feeling the most.


___________________
June 2018 mix

Old Post Apr-01-2016 15:26 
Click Here to See the Profile for Woony Click here to Send Woony a Private Message Add Woony to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SystematicX1
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Washington Coast

quote:
Originally posted by AlphaStarred
Hah! And people here were making fun of me for using a Tascam. I've always been using a DP-004, and was actually thinking last night of saving for one of the higher end ones (e.g. DP-24SD, so I can actually multitrack live).

If I'm actually able to buy something like the DP-24SD, I really don't see the purpose of using a DAW. Unless you guys can convince me otherwise.


Naw man, no one is making fun because alot of people do still use old hardware for vintage sake or novelty of sound. Nothing wrong at all with that.
As Woony did state however, flexible/powerful vs "the issues" you are coming here with. Essentially it is your choice


___________________
Phil

_____________________________________

_____________________________________

Old Post Apr-01-2016 16:22  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for SystematicX1 Click here to Send SystematicX1 a Private Message Add SystematicX1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
AlphaStarred
-__---__-_-_-_-----_



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY

quote:
Originally posted by SystematicX1
Naw man, no one is making fun because alot of people do still use old hardware for vintage sake or novelty of sound. Nothing wrong at all with that.


I agree, I meant RANN was deriding me for it in a previous thread.

quote:
As Woony did state however, flexible/powerful vs "the issues" you are coming here with. Essentially it is your choice


Yeah, I mean honestly, if it's more cost-effective and better overall for me to start using a DAW, I'm definitely going to consider it - I just want some advice given my workstation, modus operandi, etc. If I can get the direct outs of my mixer into a hardware (digital) multitrack recorder, then it might be better and easier, ultimately. Unless I'm still missing something here...

Old Post Apr-01-2016 16:34  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for AlphaStarred Click here to Send AlphaStarred a Private Message Add AlphaStarred to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
AlphaStarred
-__---__-_-_-_-----_



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Ok, so this is pretty interesting.

Technically, if I want to use the direct outs of my mixer (I have a Micro Series 1202 VLZ Mackie now, so only 4 direct outs) and go into the 8-track inputs of the Korg D888, then technically my external FX unit going through my Mackie AUX would be routed through, as well, right? And I'm guessing I can apparently do extra EQ-ing on the Korg, as well, and even apply the built-in FX over the FX I already have going through the AUX on my Mackie?



Might try and save for the Tascam DP-24SD instead, as it has more tracks, but it doesn't seem to include EQ and a built-in FX unit, like the Korg. Although maybe I don't need all this...but then again, maybe the Korg would allow for more experimentation, given those additional features.

Meanwhile, I'll also want to save up for a 16-channel mixer.

Last edited by AlphaStarred on Apr-01-2016 at 17:20

Old Post Apr-01-2016 16:58  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for AlphaStarred Click here to Send AlphaStarred a Private Message Add AlphaStarred to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
aquila
Supreme Pantsaddict



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Mayfair

Maybe you could find a couple old Tascam DA-88 multitrack recorders?


___________________
-~-

Old Post Apr-01-2016 18:45 
Click Here to See the Profile for aquila Click here to Send aquila a Private Message Visit aquila's homepage! Add aquila to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
AlphaStarred
-__---__-_-_-_-----_



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY

quote:
Originally posted by aquila
Maybe you could find a couple old Tascam DA-88 multitrack recorders?


I really would prefer not to record on cassette lol. Using a DAT and having it break on me in the past was a pain in the backside.

Old Post Apr-01-2016 18:48  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for AlphaStarred Click here to Send AlphaStarred a Private Message Add AlphaStarred to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
AlphaStarred
-__---__-_-_-_-----_



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Damn...I've just realized that with a DAW, I can record sampled stems, and use them throughout a track. Without a DAW, I don't see myself really pulling that off.

Last edited by AlphaStarred on Apr-01-2016 at 19:52

Old Post Apr-01-2016 19:45  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for AlphaStarred Click here to Send AlphaStarred a Private Message Add AlphaStarred to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SystematicX1
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Washington Coast

lol you will be amazed at what you can do


___________________
Phil

_____________________________________

_____________________________________

Old Post Apr-01-2016 19:50  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for SystematicX1 Click here to Send SystematicX1 a Private Message Add SystematicX1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Multitracking without using a DAW
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackSander kleinberg ID [2009] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackBrainbug - Rain (Cascade Remix) [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 14:26.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!