 |
|
|
|
 |
chris marsh
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2012
Location: london
|
|
|
honestly i think that unless you have a room that sounds great (or is really well treated for bass/first reflection etc) it is really not worth spending that much on monitors. IMO in this case its better to invest in a good set of headpones (i used AKG k701 which you can buy for around £100 now which seems like an absolute bargain) and some more mid range focused speakers like HS5 or Mixcubes. And reference professional mixes using something like voxengo span Youll get better mixes
Ive got genelec 8040a which are lovely speakers with a good bass response down to 45 HZ. However in my current untreated room, which although a good size (its my living room) and although i have done good speaker placement I cant make any mix decisions based on the output of the genelecs. It would be like mixing with a huge load of eq boosts and cuts accross the frequency spectrum, a shit load of wiered sounding reverb added and messed up stereo imaging.
I mean certain bass frequencies stick out a mile, so when the bass hits a certain note its like boom! impossible
___________________
https://soundcloud.com/cj-marshall-2
http://soundcloud.com/auroraproject
|
|
Jul-10-2017 21:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by MSZ
I was comparing many monitors this week, If I were to splurge I'd personally get Yamaha hs8's (amazing how much better they are than even the 7's) or the likes of JBL 5/8 with those nice horn/waveguides. Those 1000+dollar monitors have nice depth but fuck that. Im too stressed to touch my bank account atm though. |
Yeah, in my shootout from a few years back, the HS80's were my top pick in the price range and they beat the shit out of many other, even more expensive monitors.
Only reason that i didn;t got for them was that my untreated space at the time was really small and had glass windows behind it, so the larger response was just going to boom.
Upgrading to something like focals is nice for the extra detail but you're talking about spending $1000 more for maybe 5% increase in sound, and unless all the other things are equal (right shape and size of room, treatment, good cabling, balanced power conditioning etc etc) then that return is even less.
| quote: | Originally posted by chris marsh
honestly i think that unless you have a room that sounds great (or is really well treated for bass/first reflection etc) it is really not worth spending that much on monitors. IMO in this case its better to invest in a good set of headpones (i used AKG k701 which you can buy for around £100 now which seems like an absolute bargain) and some more mid range focused speakers like HS5 or Mixcubes. And reference professional mixes using something like voxengo span Youll get better mixes
Ive got genelec 8040a which are lovely speakers with a good bass response down to 45 HZ. However in my current untreated room, which although a good size (its my living room) and although i have done good speaker placement I cant make any mix decisions based on the output of the genelecs. It would be like mixing with a huge load of eq boosts and cuts across the frequency spectrum, a shit load of weird sounding reverb added and messed up stereo imaging.
I mean certain bass frequencies stick out a mile, so when the bass hits a certain note its like boom! impossible |
As I said above the other things need to be equal, so beyond a certain point, spending more or having better monitors is a waste. It's like using an an F1 car to go grocery shipping; You need a race track to take full advantage of the car.
There's a bit of a myth about mixcubes. They're really to cross reference for TV production as they mimic shitty TV speakers, and HS5's will give you the mid range but still not much detail. It's really a third or even fourth stop reference after your main monitors and headphones and car system.
True mix engineers don't bother referencing things like mix cubes outside of TV becuase they know how their speakers sound. I know one guy that can mix for stereo on a full surround setup and nail it without referencing. It's about knowing translation of your monitors more than anything else.
I don't mean to contradict you, but there' no way your 8040's go down to 45hz. For a start Gene only claim 48hz and that's a real stretch, I'd be amazed if those 6.5 drivers can even push out 80hz accurately, let alone 48hz.
|
|
Jul-11-2017 17:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
varun
Sunbaked
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Bangkok
|
|
|
Re: I want to upgrade my monitors... BUT
| quote: | Originally posted by Connector
... will I think its worth it?
... will they sound better?
... will my life be complete if i buy new ones?
I have a pair of M-Audio Bx8 studiophile monitors right now, the first i ever bought. I have been looking at the Genelec M040.
They are hot and sexy and would look good at my place. Chicks would probably dig them too. But how big difference is it between theese two? Would i regret it?
The Bx8 has an 8" woofer and m040 6,5". But bigger is not always better?
I cant go listen to them anyplace near right now so im just asking here.
Did YOU regret buying new monitors? Or is there no such thing as regret when we are talking about better sound? |
What is the purpose of considering new monitors?
Do you want to impress the ladies?
You have money to splurge and want to feel better about life?
Are your current monitors holding you back?
Please advise your intentions clearly which in turn will enable us to advise you properly.
Nevertheless, the Genelec M040 is an excellent monitor - in the same ballpark as the Focal CMS 65 and the Adam A7X.
___________________
Spacy dreamer
|
|
Jul-12-2017 09:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
chris marsh
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2012
Location: london
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Yeah, in my shootout from a few years back, the HS80's were my top pick in the price range and they beat the shit out of many other, even more expensive monitors.
Only reason that i didn;t got for them was that my untreated space at the time was really small and had glass windows behind it, so the larger response was just going to boom.
Upgrading to something like focals is nice for the extra detail but you're talking about spending $1000 more for maybe 5% increase in sound, and unless all the other things are equal (right shape and size of room, treatment, good cabling, balanced power conditioning etc etc) then that return is even less.
As I said above the other things need to be equal, so beyond a certain point, spending more or having better monitors is a waste. It's like using an an F1 car to go grocery shipping; You need a race track to take full advantage of the car.
There's a bit of a myth about mixcubes. They're really to cross reference for TV production as they mimic shitty TV speakers, and HS5's will give you the mid range but still not much detail. It's really a third or even fourth stop reference after your main monitors and headphones and car system.
True mix engineers don't bother referencing things like mix cubes outside of TV becuase they know how their speakers sound. I know one guy that can mix for stereo on a full surround setup and nail it without referencing. It's about knowing translation of your monitors more than anything else.
I don't mean to contradict you, but there' no way your 8040's go down to 45hz. For a start Gene only claim 48hz and that's a real stretch, I'd be amazed if those 6.5 drivers can even push out 80hz accurately, let alone 48hz. |
no worries at all. I thought i had read they went down to 45HZ but after googling it the data sheet says there is a -3db cut at this point so it was inaccurate of me I stand corrected As the for the accuracy of the lows i couldn't tell you, but they do sound good to me in a treated room
yup I agree the mixcube or other "grot box" isn't a first point of reference, but for me in my room its (i have one and run it in mono) more useful than the 8040s and in turn less useful than the AKGs and i was just giving my opinion, and wondering if the OP has similar conditions to work in.
I used to have a well treated room, with about 15 traps, including some extra thick ones for the lows and then i was using the 8040s a lot. Im plannng to treat my new room soon but as its the living room aesthetics and practicality have to be considered too
Im not a mix engineer, let alone a true mix engineer (im a fireman ) But i find referencing other tracks useful. I think its the single biggest factor that helped my tracks start to sound better and less crappy
also seems like people do use the mixcube(s) for the same purpose as i do http://www.soundonsound.com/reviews...-active-mixcube etc
I did a days tuition with your mate (alex i think) quite a few year ago and I think he said you are an ex pro engineer and spoke very highly of you. Are you still working with sound? I think he mentioned that you were in the states setting up a new business
___________________
https://soundcloud.com/cj-marshall-2
http://soundcloud.com/auroraproject
Last edited by chris marsh on Jul-12-2017 at 17:55
|
|
Jul-12-2017 12:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by chris marsh
no worries at all. I thought i had read they went down to 45HZ but after googling it the data sheet says there is a -3db cut at this point so it was inaccurate of me I stand corrected As the for the accuracy of the lows i couldn't tell you, but they do sound good to me in a treated room
yup I agree the mixcube or other "grot box" isn't a first point of reference, but for me in my room its (i have one and run it in mono) more useful than the 8040s and in turn less useful than the AKGs and i was just giving my opinion, and wondering if the OP has similar conditions to work in.
I used to have a well treated room, with about 15 traps, including some extra thick ones for the lows and then i was using the 8040s a lot. Im plannng to treat my new room soon but as its the living room aesthetics and practicality have to be considered too
Im not a mix engineer, let alone a true mix engineer (im a fireman ) But i find referencing other tracks useful. I think its the single biggest factor that helped my tracks start to sound better and less crappy
also seems like people do use the mixcube(s) for the same purpose as i do http://www.soundonsound.com/reviews...-active-mixcube etc
I did a days tuition with your mate (alex i think) quite a few year ago and I think he said you are an ex pro engineer and spoke very highly of you. Are you still working with sound? I think he mentioned that you were in the states setting up a new business |
Oh fuck, that's you! I'd forgotten. That's so weird, I literally got a text from Alex about 20mins ago. He's absolutely killing it. He won a Bafta two years ago and was nominated last year - he's become a pretty big name in score for TV, especially documentaries. Not sure if he's still teaching?
I'm not doing sound for money (lol) anymore, I had a great time but ultimately, doing those hours and having that lifestyle was sucking the life out of me and I started to lose all passion for music. I would mention what projects I was working on and people would lose their shit, but all the wow factor had gone for me and I didn't want my job to make me permanently hate music or score, and end up bitter like most of those before me.
It became a hobby again and I'm so much happier about it, not to mention I earn 10 times what I used to when I was allegedly at the very top of the industry.
You;re right though about the Auratones, I suppose they do have a good use, just most of the guys I worked with in a professional capacity were kinda over them, but that has more to do with the fact they didn't need them unless they were working on a mainstream TV show that people might watch on a shitty TV or phone, as all the score mixes were done to accommodate amazing speakers as that was the primary medium.
Also, I probably underestimate how useful they are for things like vocals or drums, and should probably give them another chance. Again, I'm a little spoiled becuase the guys I used to work with and know now, just spend so much time in front of their preferred monitors which are usually $10k+ that they don't need or want to check on another medium. My car has an exceptionally shitty sound system, that has such bad stereo imaging, it;s basically mono, so that's my grotbox lol.
Have a look in to Ethan Wiener or real traps for ideas; they do some soundproofing options that are designed for the home, things like mini traps and gobos that don't make your living area look hideous. I think there was even one bass trap disguised as a plant?
|
|
Jul-12-2017 21:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|