|
| quote: | Originally posted by Dj Pluviose
I mean back then, if you made a really hot track, it would sell in physical copy and you'd make some money... |
That still happens nowadays, even more frequently than in the last decade, with the relatively recent resurgence of vinyl.
| quote: | | ...so that's why artists gave it their all, shooting for timeless classics. |
I don't think any classics were made with the artist's aim of making a classic. It just happens sometimes. Most artists, I think, make tracks for themselves, ultimately - having fun and just doing what they want. Some people will like the outcome, some won't - you can't please everybody.
| quote: | | The internet changed that... so maybe that's why many stopped trying? |
On the contrary, I think the internet and SC actually contributed to the resurgence of vinyl, various old and new styles of electronica, and a host of new artists coming onto the scene. Many of the old record labels' demise had to do with artists no longer producing, or simply taking a new direction in their work, where they would get signed to other labels putting out that sort of style. Therefore I don't think the internet contributed to the demise of such record labels.
As for putting 'good' DJs and artists out of business - there are still plenty of oldschool artists/DJs doing their thing, so if anything, I think the internet contributed to their popularity, rather than the opposite. Of course, there were some pop and rock bands and such that blamed Napster, etc. for their lack of revenue - and this is understandable - but we're talking more about the EDM scene, in which case I don't think it applies as much, especially nowadays.
|