 |
|
|
|
 |
Mel David
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney
|
|
|
Apr-03-2016 00:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
Dj Dizzy
Guaranteed Fresh...

Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Atlanta
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Someone explain a legit technical why you'd mix to anything other than 0dbfs.
Go on. I'm waiting |
Are you referring to my post or someone else's? And if you were asking me that question, were you asking why gainstage to a few db under 0db to prepare it for mastering? It's for safety's sake, ME's always ask that x-db amount of headroom is left for them. I don't ever put a limiter on the master bus of any premasters, I keep a close eye to see what the max peak is and gainstage the song so that the loudest peak doesn't exceed what the ME says to leave for headroom, the amount of headroom needed by the ME is an arbitrary number, it's just so the ME doesnt have to deal with any clipping. Yes you could limit it but why would you put a limiter on the master bus of a premaster, just to turn around and send it to a ME who will do the master bus limiting? Makes more sense to let the ME handle limiting on the master and just gainstage it properly for him.
___________________
Access Virus TI Polar, Moog Sub Phatty, Waldorf Pulse 2, Roland JP-8000, Technics 1210MK2's, NI Traktor Konyrol S4, Yamaha HS7's
Soundcloud | YouTube
|
|
Apr-03-2016 14:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
|
Thanks Mel but it was facetious and rhetorical question.
The answer is there is no good reason to mix below 0db, unless as Dizzy alluded to, your chosen mastering engineer wants it.
Even then, I really don't get it - If you send them a 0dbfs mix which has been properly mixed on a calibrated system, what is the possibly scientific logic stopping them from taking that file, poppin it in to their 32bit floating point environment and dropping the gain by 3db or 6db if that's who they like to work?
However, if you mix to say -3db or -6db, you're printing the file, with the relative noise at that -3db or -6db point, which means if they then maximize or makeup gain or raise the volume (whatever to get you to 0db) then they are raising the noise floor with it and effectively introducing more noise than.
Personally, I think it stems (soz for the pun) from mastering engineers receiving brickwall limited, clipped peaked files that were a pain to work with so they told these idiots to mix to -3 or -6 as they can at least work with that headroom.
But if I sent a file that was properly mixed to be mastered, and the ME asked for it -3db lower I'd tell him to give up the day job.
|
|
Apr-06-2016 02:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
intersample distortion would be a good one. I can list a bunch of others but i think that pretty much satisfies legit and technical. |
Bring it my biarch.
No clipping = no legit reason. And even if the MA wants it lower then just reduce the master on your finished file by that amount and print. The entire point of gain staging is to get the highest level and lowest noise floor without distortion. It's bonkers to try to mix to say 80% of you available headroom when there's an inherent relative noisefloor.
|
|
Apr-14-2016 00:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:11.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|