 |
|
|
|
 |
Zenchowdah
I'm beyond it.
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: va
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
that's a 'fundamental law' being wrong in general, what you posted is not an exception to the rule, nor an example of a rule being temporarily broken, it is the new rule.
also, (obviously) it's not currently regarded to be correct. you might as well have said "omg the world is flat. omg it isn't".
and btw, omg where are the leptons! |
okay, being broken, nuclear reactions. breaks the law of conservation of matter.
___________________
Get Killed.
Get Noticed.
Keine Schoenheit Ohne Gefahr
|
|
Oct-29-2006 15:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zenchowdah
I'm beyond it.
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: va
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
A lot of scientists theorize that Dark Matter is the culprit for galaxies appearing to move and swirl in directions that contradict what our current laws (Newton's?) say about gravity. Who knows what else is being defied seeing as how we know so little about the universe... |
dark matter is bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordehai_Milgrom
___________________
Get Killed.
Get Noticed.
Keine Schoenheit Ohne Gefahr
|
|
Oct-29-2006 15:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
|
|
|
Yeah, the Dark Matter article mentioned all that. Still, how does a proposal for modifying laws put forth in...1981...make something bullshit? I am honestly asking you if you have any substantial counter-evidence to the existence of dark matter, preferably data you have collected yourself. I'm not refuting what you are saying, it's just that the existence of dark matter is more widely accepted among the astronomical community than MOND.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_curve
Anyways, the actual point of this was that laws that the scientific community has established as part of the scientific process are needing to be revised to correlate with all the knowledge we ascertain - proof that the scientific process is not an infallible perfection, since it has been created by humans. Admittedley, the scientific process gives way to change much more easily than, say, most religions do, but maybe there is a smilar individual component within them both - different scientific theories could be compared to different denominations of faith, and different religions altogether could be compared to different views on the same topic (see: Zenchowdah "Dark Matter is bullshit" 2006). Seems to me like all comparisons between the two indicate the same supposed fundamental goals and that preference between one or the other is not one based on fact at all, but opinion.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|
|
Oct-29-2006 18:23
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|