|
| quote: | Originally posted by gallantrybot
The argument had been made quite some time ago. Or did YOU forget? |
Go ahead and link me your argument then.
| quote: | | It's not that I feel above anyone. Quite the opposite, really. I really just don't have the time or the patience to argue with a bunch of blind contrarians who fail to see the writing on the wall even after I've already shoved their faces in it and screamed, "LOOOOOK!!!" on more occasions than I even care to count. |
You refuse to debate because you can't debate.
| quote: | | I also wouldn't call regurgitating the governments talking points your "own well thought out arguments" because it's still really the same color but just in a different tone. |
Please, link me the post where I simply copy and paste off of some government website...
| quote: | Extremist Libertarian propaganda? lol - But wasn't our country originally founded upon Libertarian principles? Hence, why America is was "the land of the free and the home of the brave." Oh yeah, I forgot, we've gone socialist now and to speak of those Libertarian principles has become equivalent to treason. |
We've gone socialist? So everything should be "every man for himself" huh? No regulations. Let the market handle everything! That's like getting rid of all traffic laws and trusting drivers not to drive 120MPH everywhere they go. There's nothing wrong with libertarianism. But your radicalism reeks of the worst potential possibilities of liberty. Your idea of liberty is no different in its potential for tyranny than any other political philosophy. What do you want? Liberty? What kind of liberty? Positive or negative? Freedom from others or a state in which individuals can realize their full potential? Both can lead to tyranny. So what the hell are you so high and mighty about? The state can decide they know what's best to realize people's full potential. Guess what that is? Tyranny. And this freedom from others which libertarians always talk about. I'm all for that...except it only works in a world in which all person's are rational, which they are not. What if I want your car? I should have the freedom to take it from you, since you think regulation is "socialist".
| quote: | | And you wonder why I put you on ignore the first time? You can't even maintain a simple correspondence without resorting to personal attacks in the effort to denigrate me and/or the efforts that I've put forth in order to shed the light of truth upon the dark recesses of our world. |
Personal attacks? LOL. You should talk. How many times did you call me stupid, blind, "sheep"? I criticize you and try to get you to debate, but you are for some reason, sensitive to criticism, and refuse to debate because debating isn't "worth your time". LOL. With that kind of attitude, I will certainly enjoy knocking you off your pedestal.
Now, are you ready for a debate, or are you just going to continue this high-than-thou, "I know the ultimate truth and you don't", bullshit? I'm certainly ready for a serious exchange. Without plagiarizing too...
NOTE: Since you believe you know the ultimate truth, read this...
"For when a political leadership believes that they hold the philosophical key to a better future, this sublime end can be used to justify drastic and brutal means." -Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty. 1969.
Yea, that includes your utopian ideal of a libertarian paradise...
___________________
Last edited by Krypton on Jan-05-2009 at 08:49
|