Originally posted by Renzo
That makes no sense. The jury in a criminal court USES the balance of probabilities [burden of proof]. The one used here is the "beyond a reasonable doubt" burden of proof. And they found him not guilty of all charges.
So the very thing that you say you use, they used. And they are in a better position to find culpability than you are.
There are two tests before the law... beyond a reasonable doubt (criminal) and balance of probabilities (civil)... Balance of Probabilities means that it is more likely then not (or vice versa).
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down
Jun-26-2009 17:08
boris_the_bear
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: Lower Chernobylstan
quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
If I had a rubber hose I would beat you all to Beat It.
omfg!!!!!11
Jun-26-2009 17:14
Renzo
where am i
Registered: Jan 2004
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
There are two tests before the law... beyond a reasonable doubt (criminal) and balance of probabilities (civil)... Balance of Probabilities means that it is more likely then not (or vice versa).
There's a reason why criminal courts use the highest level of burden of persuasion. A man's liberty is at stake. Preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence would never suffice.
Jun-26-2009 17:21
ChemEnhanced
ƒ¶ƒåƒÓƒÛƒnƒéƒßƒåƒnƒÚƒÕƒÞƒ
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Milton, ON Canada
where there's smoke, there's fire
I am sure MJ had inappropriate relations with children.
___________________
quote:
Scott has been introduced to the rave scene, and Ecstasy, by Craig. The two of them go out on the weekends, with some of Craigs friends, and stay up all night, dancing in a drug-fueled trance.
Last edited by Moral Hazard on Apr-26-2011 at 07:48
Jun-26-2009 17:31
dukes
meh!
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: No mans land
see apparently madame tussauds is getting rid of jacksons waxwork.... they are replacing it with him
Originally posted by Renzo
There's a reason why criminal courts use the highest level of burden of persuasion. A man's liberty is at stake. Preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence would never suffice.
I agree with you. All I was saying is that for me to be satisfied I only need a balance of probabilities... if I had the power to incarcerate then I'd demand a higher burden but I don't.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down
Jun-26-2009 18:09
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
quote:
Originally posted by woscar
Not at all, I'm just being objective. And you didn't answer my question.
See the people's evidence in both cases against him... that was enough to satisfy me. So we weigh the evidence differently... I don't care what you think.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down
Jun-26-2009 18:11
woscar
Starstuff
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Guatemala, Guatemala
I dedicate this song in memory of those who have passed on:
Peter-Paul Pigmans (January 31, 1961–August 27, 2003)
Michael Joseph Jackson (August 29, 1958 – June 25, 2009)
Jun-26-2009 18:40
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
quote:
Originally posted by woscar
Question remains unanswered.
You asked for my evidence... I referred you to the People's evidence in the People v. Jackson.... the transcript is way more comprehensive then I could be. Do some reading.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down
Jun-26-2009 18:50
jonSun
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago CTA #77
FFS HE IS MICHAEL JACKSON PEOPLE
If i had a lil boy i would be honored MJ let him suck his discolored pecker
