Hilarious, Trancer-X posts facts after more facts including people who where actually at ground zero during 9/11 and the usual trolls just come back with insults and nothing to back them up.

Figures, if you cannot debunk the reality of it better to call someone an ass clown.

LOL



trolls.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Hilarious, Trancer-X posts facts after more facts including people who where actually at ground zero during 9/11 and the usual trolls just come back with insults and nothing to back them up. Figures, if you cannot debunk the reality of it better to call someone an ass clown. LOL trolls.

you got that right!

quote:

Originally posted by XaNaX Hmmm how about your claims that WTC7 was blown up and that the Pentagon was struck by something other than Flight 77. You are right, I don't really need to defame you, your posts in this thread speak for themselves. Well the two of you use the same taticts in trolling this thread, it is only natural that I respond to both of you in the same way. Like I said, I'm retiring from this thread. After I leave work today I'll not even view it again.

That aside, you're wrong. Would you like to see the list of people with PhDs that disagree with your rodent-like reasoning?

http://www.wanttoknow.info/070618professorsquestion911

Karen Johnson says it all perfectly. If you can listen to what she says and still cling to the Official Story, you're well beyond help.

Interesting to note that the towers were insulated with asbestos.

...now, how could that be solved? a lengthy, very expensive renovation?

...

Of course, Economy 101 really, if you cant afford to renovate a building fly a plane into it and blow it up. Much less hassle to clean up all the debris and those few thousand dead bodies than to remove all the asbestos.

___________________

and the contract to build a bigger one. :P

really, i was being facetious.

quote:

Originally posted by {b.s.e.} Interesting to note that the towers were insulated with asbestos.

so is every other building built in NYC (and most parts of the country) in the 60s and 70s.

this thread needs to die!!!

quote:

Originally posted by jerZ07002 so is every other building built in NYC (and most parts of the country) in the 60s and 70s. this thread needs to die!!!

f-a-c-e-t-i-o-u-s

and, agreed.

I just clicked on this poll's results for the first time ever and noticed "yes" is winning by a decent margin.

___________________
sempre contra a corrente do jogo

quote:

Originally posted by noikeee I just clicked on this poll's results for the first time ever and noticed "yes" is winning by a decent margin.

Not too far off from the AOL poll I saw a few weeks ago.

quote:

Originally posted by Moongoose Of course, Economy 101 really, if you cant afford to renovate a building fly a plane into it and blow it up. Much less hassle to clean up all the debris and those few thousand dead bodies than to remove all the asbestos.

note: the Port Authority was seeking approval to demolish it, but were rescinded due the asbestos.


lol, 37000 and change. It's quite obvious that it's not as it appears to be, regardless of skepticism.