 |
|
|
|
 |
MarkT
Automatic Static

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Skipper
It's not the most ideal way to ask the question, but in order to be addressing the financial crisis today, the PM would have had to HAVE DONE various things before the present time. Interviewer was asking what those things were.
I understand asking for clarification, but he asks THREE times. And after each time, continues to answer the question despite clearly not understanding what he was being asked. Why not spend a little more time understanding the question before you start providing an answer?
The liberal aide understood the question, didn't she?
Dion is absolutely painful to watch. Moreso than Palin. If these two get elected I'm throwing myself in front of a train. |
I'm kind of stunned that you dislike Dion *so* much because of this...as if a PM ever has to make important decisions "on the fly" without the opportunity for clarity and discussion. Isn't that a bit of a ridiculous standard to hold?
He asked for clarification three times because the impatient idiot of an interviewer *repeatedly* didn't answer Dion's request for a further context.
'If you were PM, what would you do differently, that Mr. Harper has not done'
Do differently if he had been elected today, had been elected in the last election...?
The interviewer needed to qualify his question by providing for WHEN Dion would have become PM.
And DION is being accused of not understanding English?
wow, lol.
If anything, it should reflect poorly on the lack of clarity by the impatient interviewer. Dion was flustered because this jackass couldn't understand Dion's request for context.
|
|
Oct-10-2008 17:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
what does it matter in the canadian parlimant? bi-national, bi-lingual parlimant??
You are mixing things up here.
I wonder how most european countries (and the rest) are doing to manage their international relations |
the "language of international relations" argument is just hogwash made up to try and lend legitimacy to a pro-English (or perhaps) anti-French bias.
International groups official languages
UN - English, French, Arabic, Russian, Chinese, and Spanish
IMF - English, French, Spanish, Arabic, German, Russian, and Chinese
International Criminal Court - English and French
International Olympic Committee - English and French
Organization for International Co-operation and development - English and French
World Trade Organization - English and French
NATO - English and French
Really, the only international groups of substance that Canada is involved in that do not use French as an official language are APEC and The Commonwealth. That said, we're also part of La Francophonie... which I'm going to presume does not do business in English.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down 
|
|
|
Oct-10-2008 17:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:40.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|