|
| quote: | Originally posted by Seventil
Seriously though - you're skewing your "facts" to a non-religious point of view. Sure, you can *say* the Bible took things from other cultures and just rewrote them - but you're also *trying* to disprove the validity of the Bible. Convienent perspective. Any argument that the Bible stole stories from other cultures is pure speculation. In fact, it's more likely (statistically AND scientifically) that other cultures took stories from the Bible and made them their own, since the widespread distribution of the Bible. |
So...Im skewing my facts into a non-religious point of view, as opposed to skewing my facts into a religious point of view? Im sorry but what view am I suppose to take? ofcourse im non-religious when I talk about science and fact, because science and fact show that the stories in the bible cant be proved. And when you start believing in things that cant be proved, you are essentially a "tool". The bible is not to be taken literally, its a metaphor for daily living. Even then, some of the shit in there is just wrong for nowadays.
No, its not convienent at all, its the truth, take a look at Noah's Ark, now do you believe in that? Because if you do, thats just silly. First its impossible to do what Noah did. Secondly in the region, there were several civilizations that had stories of floods that were simliar to Noah's Ark story, why? because the area has had a history of floods and one particular flood destroyed most of the houses, cities and killed many people. One story in particular about when one of these big floods came, that a King had built a large boat that supported him, and the royal family, including a large amount of their riches, as well as food to survive the flood itself. Could be a case of broken telephone, or it could be that Noah exsisted like the bible says, and managed to do something that is ridiculously impossible.
| quote: | | Anyway, back your allegations up with proof, if you have them. |
Great, make me work to find you links, that you wont even read or care for. If you want, I can search later tonight when I have time to do this crap, and I am sure I can find you lots of interseting sites.
| quote: | | And yes, I agree that proving a negative isn't a good argument. However, I must question your motives for believing someone didn't exist or that something isn't true to begin with. You can play Devil's Advocate with religious matters all day. |
My motives? what motives does real fact and science have to do with disproving a bunch of fairy tale stories that cant be proven otherwise? Like I said, its all Mother Goose fairy tales bullshit that is put to give mankind faith and understanding the question "Why?". Not that it makes it wrong at all, I mean, Religion can be very good too, but dont pass it off as fact, when its only fiction.
I despise the fact that religious supporters hide behind the "well you cant disprove it, so it must be true" reasoning. What ever happened to just having faith in God and being a good person, for the sake of being a good person. And not to take a literal word for word of what a bunch of men wrote a millenium and a half ago. Whatever I said here, is either been on TV or read somewhere, and I am merely paraphrasing what I saw and took in, not because I enjoy bashing the validity of the bible, but because I like to know what is real fact, and I love to make a good argument...it just happens to be were talkin bout religion.
|