|
_A_ true _Gent_leman
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
you don't understand you gullible fool. the onus is on you, its always been on you. im still waiting for an answer re how flight 77 passengers and crew got to the pentagon crash site. to entertain your nonsensical BS this would be one of the earliest questions for which you had a satisfactory answer to. but, in typical CT style you quickly move on...
|
I quickly move on? I destroyed you. The hole in the Pentagon does not fit a Boeing 757, the black box does not match the official story, the bodies look fake - there is no identification of the bodies, there is no plane except for a pittance's worth, and you're telling me I'm full of bullshit? Aluminum doesn't destroy concrete, laddy, no matter what sort of names you call me.
| quote: |
gee i dunno. does the pentagon have anything in common structurally with the WTCs? what do you think kids, do the buildings look at all alike??
|
Concrete, aluminum and steel act the same upon impact, especially when a plane is in question, and all speeds are similiar. In true agent fashion, you confuse the subject.
| quote: |
all 3 of those plane crashes are unique in the history of aviation. if you think you can predict what happens in these scenarios, you are talking out of your ass. the fact that the pentagon crash site was different to the WTC crash sites is completely and utterly irrelevant. |
Not at all, they all happened at essentially the same speed and the all have the same weight, so the impact should have been relatively the same. Physics is a constant in the Universe, remember? 
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Your engine theory doesn't really hold water with that video of people saying that they couldn't see markings from Brooklyn. Look how close the engines were to the body of the plane - you can clearly see that the hole in the Pentagon wall is considerably wider than the body - so there you go.
|
You really don't understand? How can the body of a plane, made out of exactly the same material as the wingspan puncture through multiple rings of the Pentagon, yet there is no damage from the wingspan? Sorry, that doesn't add up.
| quote: |
PENTAGON EYEWITNESS DEBUNKS OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY
Civilian Pilot Saw Global Hawk and Control Plane
Christopher Bollyn
An eyewitness from the Pentagon has come forward with an astonishing account that debunks the official 9/11 story and corroborates the hypothesis that an unmanned – and weaponized – Global Hawk drone was involved in the attack.
Nearly 5 years after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, an eyewitness from the Pentagon has come forth with testimony, which, if accurate, completely debunks the official version that a hijacked Boeing 757 flew into the 5-sided military fortress housing the U.S. Department of Defense.
Samuel D. Danner, a civilian pilot and electrical engineer from Hagerstown, Maryland, says he was trying to get out of Washington on the morning of 9/11 after hearing of the attacks on the World Trade Center. Having made a wrong turn, Danner wound up heading south on Washington Blvd. (Virginia Highway 27), the highway that passes alongside the western side of the Pentagon. It was from the shoulder of Highway 27, across from the Pentagon, that Danner says he observed the approaching aircraft involved in the attack.
Danner's eyewitness account corroborates the theory that an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), known as Global Hawk, was flown by remote control into the newly renovated section of the Pentagon, the fortress of the Department of War that was built on a low lying area formerly known as Hell's Bottom. Although Danner's testimony is unique in its detail and description of the aircraft, it is supported by an abundance of photographic evidence and numerous statements made by other eyewitnesses.
Now a multi-billion dollar defense project involving contractors like L3 Communications Titan Group, Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., and Raytheon, the Global Hawk is a 44-foot long jet-powered surveillance UAV with a 116 foot wing span that can fly 12,000 miles at an altitude of 65,000 feet at 400 miles per hour. At the time of the attack, however, the U.S. Air Force had only 6 Global Hawks in service. Two of the original Global Hawks reportedly crashed, one at China Lake, California, another "somewhere overseas," according to a spokesman at Edwards Air Force Base where the aircraft is tested.
"Two Global Hawk crashes occurred in the Central Command Area of Operation, which is Southwest Asia," a spokesman for the U.S.A.F. later told AFP. "Both these crashes occurred during support for Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom, which started after September 11th," he added.
The evidence supporting the theory that a Global Hawk was flown into the Pentagon by remote control has been investigated by this writer in American Free Press. While Danner's testimony corroborates this hypothesis, which is supported by evidence, there is not a single piece of evidence, physical or photographic in the public domain to support the government version that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon.. |
___________________
Wave is to particle as zero is to one as bagpipes are to modem noises.
|
