|
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Oh no, the "engineer" that could not even prove that the official BS story is correct is back!
|
we don't need to prove jack shit. the onus is with you little boy. 7 years and still no peer-review. no second investigation. losers!
everyone should check out the growth of the truth! 
| quote: |
The decline of the 9/11 "truth" movement
For most of this year I haven't thought much about truthers. Nearly all measurements (see one exception below) indicate that their movement has been moving backwards since it peaked in 2006. They certainly haven't moved a single step closer towards achieving their goal of a major new investigation, and we know they won't be conducting or funding a serious investigation themselves. A few additional indicators of the decline:
–Attendance at the big NYC Sept. 11 truther rally
2006: 1000+
2007: about 300
2008: 120-150 (truthers' estimates)
–Even after it was opened to discussion of all conspiracies, traffic at the largest 9/11 truther website has fallen drastically over the past year.
911blogger.com unique visits, Sept. 2007: 337,000
911blogger.com unique visits, Sept. 2008: 187,000
911blogger.com had fewer visits this September, the big month for truther attention, than in all but four other months in the past year. Overall, unique visits are down by 47% over last year.
–Steven E. Jones' craptastic Journal of 9/11 Stu(n)dies published 29 articles in 2007 and 6 to date in 2008. The "Scholars" websites get almost no traffic these days. |
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=126090
i shudder to think how much time the really dedicated morons are wasting with this shit.
___________________
|