why hasn't it been published in an engineering journal huh? hahahahaha. you fucking fraud.

10 characteristics of conspiracy theorists
A useful guide by Donna Ferentes

6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad.
Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have "open minds" and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X I think that's much of the reason why I gave up on that kid ever figuring any of this out. He's so far gone that even if Dick Cheney himself came out and said the he in fact was behind it, Krypton would undoubtedly try to argue against him from every single angle. Well, either that or he'd just blow his own brains out as a result of his not being able to cope with his inadequately perceived reality becoming so thoroughly shattered. The fact that these trolls categorically deny eyewitness accounts such as these (which I have no doubt were purposefully omitted from the official report) is telling enough as it is that these folks are either in an absolute state of denial or are in fact working in the effort to help extend the criminal coverup surrounding the events of that day.

Intolerance of criticism. Eyewitness accounts prove nothing by themselves in a court of law...idiot...

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X Wow, the trolls are making it easy for me today. lol

this isn't much of a discussion board for you considering 1/2 of the contributors to the PDD are on your ignore list. All I did was state an absolute fact!

perhaps since there is no give and take between you and anyone you should just stop posting. what exactly do you get out of coming here?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN who gives a shit what the widows think?

no kidding. for the most part, it's just a bunch of stay-at-home mom's. that group had way too much influence based on sheer sympathy. they held up every forward movement with respect to rebuilding.

Only a pussy puts people on ignore. There is a lot to be learned from other people's ideas, points of view, ways of thinking, etc... especially from those you are at odds with or don't agree with. It helps to grow, learn, and mature.

___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.

Latest Mix

quote:

Originally posted by Zild It helps to grow, learn, and mature.

but if you already know everything like trancer does, you dont need other people.

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the destruction of the Twin Towers Tony Szamboti Mechanical Engineer Feb. 17, 2008 Abstract: In the past two years there has been an exponential growth in the number of people questioning the explanations we have been given, by official U.S. government bodies, concerning the collapses of the three WTC buildings in NYC on 9/11/2001. It is probably safe to say that much of this growth can be attributed to the Internet publishing of a paper by Physics Professor Steven Jones in November 2005, which put forth the hypothesis that the Twin Towers and WTC7 were actually demolished with pre-positioned cutter charges. This hypothesis is in tension with the present government explanation of impact damage and fires being the causes for the complete collapses of the buildings. My intent here is to show that any honest and objective look at all of the theories, for the destruction of the twin towers, including the present government explanation, will cause one to realize that only the controlled demolition hypothesis is sustainable. I believe an honest look at the evidence will convince anyone that the controlled demolition hypothesis provides the best explanation for the complete collapses of the towers, as well as the damage to the buildings and objects surrounding them. The remarkable collapse of WTC7 seems to have had a separate cause in its own controlled demolition. Video of the collapse of WTC7 can be viewed quickly at http://www.journalof911studies.com/beginners.html before continuing, as it plays a part in understanding what probably occurred in NYC on Sept. 11, 2001 << CONTINUED HERE >>

That guy hasn't examined one piece of evidence from any collapse, let alone be able to definitively say what killed the towers. It's like a detective charging someone for murder, and never looking at the body, crime scene, etc. NOWHERE IN THE PAPER IS THERE ANY USE OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE...

Additionally, PKC, jez, and Lebez, get this... These are what he considered the more credible theories!!

And I quote..."So how then did the towers collapse?

The answer is that another mechanism must have caused the collapses. Over the last couple of years there have been several alternative collapse causation theories proposed, to supplant the insufficient fire and impact damage theory, some more serious than others, and they are:

1. The towers were destroyed via controlled demolition with the use of incendiaries and explosives.
2. A directed energy weapon was used to destroy the towers.
3. Mini-nukes were used to destroy the towers."

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN but if you already know everything like trancer does, you dont need other people.

Knowing everything must be amazing. Kind of like being on LSD.

___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.

Latest Mix

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton 1. The towers were destroyed via controlled demolition with the use of incendiaries and explosives. 2. A directed energy weapon was used to destroy the towers. 3. Mini-nukes were used to destroy the towers."

fucking classic

yet another "source" that trancer posts without proper vetting.

edit: renegade was the first to succinctly describe this tendency:

quote:

First of all, you seem largely incapable of creative or novel thought. Basically all your posts here are just the unparsed regurgitation of other peoples ideas. You're like the man in Searle's Chinese Room: receiving information from one side and passing it out the other with seemingly little conscious reflection.

Last edited by pkcRAISTLIN on Oct-31-2008 at 06:24

quote:

Originally posted by Zild Only a pussy puts people on ignore. There is a lot to be learned from other people's ideas, points of view, ways of thinking, etc... especially from those you are at odds with or don't agree with. It helps to grow, learn, and mature.

I think it really says a lot that you're so quick to chime in and further put the focus on me when the topic of the thread is "Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?"

The fact of the matter is that I possess more than enough intellect and common sense to distinguish between those who actually have something important or relevant to say and those who only seek to safeguard their own ignorance (while perpetuating other's) by vehemently denying the facts surrounding the many unexplained circumstances and events which happend on that fateful day.

I put the trolls on ignore because all they ever do is mindlessly repeat the same propagandistic bullsh*t that the Bush administration pundits in the mainstream media has been feeding us while also verbally abusing me and everyone else who speaks out against the continued covering up of true nature of the crimes that were committed on that day (which apparently continue to be perpetuated by a highly organized online informational warfare team.)

Well, it was THAT as well as the fact that they seem to have caustic personalities which seem to goad even spiritually guided people like myself to behave like assholes in response to their vituperative attacks.

I'm just tired of swimming in their cesspool of ignorance, that's all. And this board is definitely a lot more pleasant when I don't have to subject myself to all of their malevolent crap.

And yeah, I'm a pussy alright. A pussy that's well armed and ready to give his life while defending what's left of his country after those Fabian Socialist fvcks have long since had their way with it - which I'm sure is a lot more than I can say for your Qliphoth kissing ass.

Remember, you can't extinguish light with darkness just as the truth can never be destroyed by lies (no matter HOW BIG they might be!)

Thank you and have a nice day

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X I put the trolls on ignore because all they ever do is mindlessly repeat the same propagandistic bullsh*t that the Bush administration pundits in the mainstream media has been feeding us while also verbally abusing me and everyone else who speaks out against the continued covering up of true nature of the crimes that were committed on that day (which apparently continue to be perpetuated by a highly organized online informational warfare team.)

No, you ignore because you can't tolerate criticism. And when someone, such as myself, actually does engage in debate, you idiots then call me a sheep, brainwashed, etc. etc. You're a fucking hypocrite. The fact is, based on your idiocy, everyone should be ignoring you...

___________________