|
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
In response to your (before delete) query doomboot:
His most important point (and forgive me if I butcher it occrider!) is
Meaning that M is not the only variable one must take into consideration when making calculations regarding the value of a currency or inflation. In other words, M is not sufficient by itself to equal inflation or a devaluation. For instance, if V is really low, then you won’t see a corresponding loss of purchasing power.
Additionally, looking at the value of a currency in a vaccum doesn’t tell us an awful lot, because there are contexts, like in China, where the devaluation has gone hand-in-hand with ~10% economic growth for quite some time. China, being one of the largest exporters, benefits from having a cheaper currency because it makes its goods more attractive to import as well as encouraging investment (assuming the State Capitalists say its ok of course!)
Or at least, that’s what I got out of his post. But you can’t hold my mistakes or misunderstandings against him, I might be completely wrong |
Sorry, I've lost interest in this 17 page thread to be quite honest. Start a new thread in PD and we can go from there. I feel like I might be misunderstanding him too so maybe if we shorten this discussion down, especially since he only pops in twice a week. Sound good?
|