|
| quote: | 1. "19 Arab hijackers"? They cannot fly Cessnas credibly; there are no airport videos of them boarding the alleged planes (minus the one purported to be one of the hijackers, taken in Maine, which we are to take on trust was his previous "connecting flight"; they use boxcutters to overpower cockpit crews successfully on all four flights; no console lockout commands are used by any of those four cockpit crews; these "hijackers" successfully navigate (in three instances) across hundreds of miles of tightly-controlled airspace to their selected targets (was FAA still supplying them navigational assistance?); they perform spot-on crashes into buildings that seasoned commercial aircraft pilots have difficulty duplicating on simulators; one of their passports survives the impact-inferno of the WTC complex. Oh sure.
2. "Four hijacked planes"? Two of the planes according to Bureau of Transportation statistics were unscheduled to fly that day; two more were not decommissioned until four years later. Two of the planes left no human remains and no debris field (according to credible eyewitness testimony at the time); the Shanksville plane left an empty hole as the official crash site while the Pentagon plane left no trace of damage from its two wingmounted six-ton engines on the outer wall of the Pentagon; the aluminum wings of the Pentagon plane survived impact with several highway lightposts knocking them down, then those same wings "folded up" and left no marks on the outer wall of the Pentagon - while both the WTC planes' aluminum wings ripped through steel like hot knives through butter; the SSDI (Social Security Death Index) shows odd discrepancies - (only a small percentage of those passengers on board are indicated as deceased); the extensive video documentation from numerous angles and cameras of the Pentagon plane that would support the official theory - ALL sequestered immediately on 911 (omitting the Fantastic Five Frames); not ONE successful NORAD interception of the planes; black boxes that we're first told are recovered and then are told were not recovered; air traffic controllers gagged (like the FDNY and NY police personnel); air traffic control tapes destroyed? Oh sure.
3. "Gravity-driven collapse"? Not one steel and concrete skyscraper in the history of the world - before or since 911 - has collapsed completely from fire or plane impact. Not one steel and concrete skyscraper in the history of the world - before or since 911 - has collapsed completely, symmetrically, at free-fall (or near-free fall) speed - without controlled demolition. Not one steel and concrete skyscraper in the history of the world - before or since 911 - has been reported by hundreds of eyewitnesses to be shaken by numerous explosions before "gravity-driven collapse". And all that molten metal that persisted at WTC ground zero for WEEKS after the collapse - natural by-product of "gravity-driven collapse"? The "gravity-driven collapse" theory of WTC 7 that NIST described as one of "extremely low probability" (bureaucracy-speak for: "A snowball's chance in h-ll")? Oh sure.
4. "Official 911 committee's investigation"? Philip Zelikow (whose pre-911 academic training in political science centered on the use and misuse of history to create "public presumption", "public myth" - ideas *assumed* to be true by a citizenry but *not known* to be true to further political agendas) was appointed executive director of the official 911 committee's investigation out of all the pool of available federal talent. Of course extracts from Zelikow's 1998 article Catastrophic Terrorism from the prestigious magazine Foreign Affairs are available online, in which Zelikow argues that had the 1993 WTC bombing succeeded it would have been a "Pearl Harbor" leading to a US fascist police state waging endless war. Zelikow's assertion mirrors that of the 2000 PNAC document, Rebuilding America's Defenses: "The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor", which itself echoes Zbigniew Brzezinski's assertion in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard: "The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor" (pages 24-25 of that book). The official 911 report itself has been documented by Professor David Ray Griffin to contain roughly (at last count) 115 lies or distortions; Kean and Hamilton themselves (chair and vice-chair of the official 911 committee report) state in their book, Without Precedent, that they were consistently denied access to evidence and lied to by administration officials to such an extent that they considered bringing criminal charges against them; US Representative Max Cleland resigned from the official 911 committee for that very reason; the 911 committee's investigation was blocked and delayed by the Bush administration until all WTC steel had been shipped off to China and melted down into toaster ovens. And the committee's report makes not one single reference to the complete, symmetrical, free-fall collapse of WTC 7. |
Look at both sides of the Pearl Harbor story. This one seems pretty neutral, just the facts http://www.antiwar.com/orig2/stinnett1.html
___________________
soulful/latin/deep house + jazz
|
