Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > Vinyls vs. CDs
Pages (57): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Nemesis44
ZZZZZzzzzzz.....



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton

quote:
Originally posted by Gunyouken
I wonder.... One can just as well do it with 2 sessions of winamp going at once then. Why bother with all the equipment? It's not as if 90% of the crowd knows what beat matching is, and/or gives a shit whether it happens or not, they just want to be happy.
------------------------


Well I wasn't refering to your typical trance crowd.
Here in the UK, if you can't DJ, quite often you will have a crowd wanting to let you know about it rather quickly.

When I said you didn't have to beat match, I was refering more to parties and music in general as this topic isn't just refering to Trance.

If you are talking about Trance, then smooth mixing and good harmonic lifts are paramount.

In the UK, there is a considerable portion of the crowd that want to see a particular DJ because of his tune selection and skill.
That however is really a different thread and doesn't refer to vinyl vs CDs and both methods need skill and creativity.

Cheers
Nem


___________________
https://www.mixcloud.com/Calvin_Karass/

Old Post Jan-03-2005 11:29  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Nemesis44 Click here to Send Nemesis44 a Private Message Visit Nemesis44's homepage! Add Nemesis44 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
mute9003
Junior tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2003
Location: brooklyn

cds vinyl fuk all dat i use tapes i dont see the point of discussion tapes replace vinyl, cds replace tapes, mp3 replace cds... theres no better or worse its personal preference lets start an thread aout japanese and american cars instead

Old Post Jan-08-2005 08:02  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for mute9003 Click here to Send mute9003 a Private Message Add mute9003 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
djlithium
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Caprica

quote:
Originally posted by Chrill
I have been a CD DJ for about 3 years but i bought a 1210 5 weeks ago to try it out because many talks about the "real feeling". But I don't get the feeling every vinyl DJ talks about. I still like the CD a lot more, it feels like I have more control with CD's.

I don't have any opinion about the time that is remain on the track, don't like the pitch (feels like it's not so precise like a cd player, I must pitch bend a lot more in the mix), don't like the sound (feels like the sound isn't mellow like a cd, sounds bad when mixing from cd to vinyl)
Well, maybe the feeling will come but i have almost lost all my good expectation for vinyl...


Your problems with going to vinyl come from the fact that your probably are unaware as to what you are looking at and touching and have at your finger tips for control. This is normal for any DJ starting out on vinyl. Period. What is scary is that most people who play CDs and mix with software still have no clue as to "what its all about" and when they jump to vinyl or came from vinyl in the first place - generally they suck - because they have no clue as to what the record is TELLING THEM about the music. You never get this from a CD or a file. However if you have worked with music sequencing softare (like Cubase VST 32 or SX or Logic) you will probably be able to figure out the relation there from a composition stand point vs. "time remaining on disc" << a completely useless factor in determining what to do when you need to mix in a new record.

Sad.

BTW, I will be raising some serious shite on this thread in the next few months KILLING DEAD digital mixing now and forever.

Yes, it can be done.


___________________
DJ Lithium
Black Tiger Recordings | NKME Ltd.
www.djlithium.com | www.blacktigerrecordings.com

Old Post Jan-11-2005 05:24  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for djlithium Click here to Send djlithium a Private Message Visit djlithium's homepage! Add djlithium to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Christian Ö.
Make U Mine



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Lidingö, Stockholm, Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by djlithium
- generally they suck - because they have no clue as to what the record is TELLING THEM about the music.

"time remaining on disc" << a completely useless factor in determining what to do when you need to mix in a new record.

I acutally was surprised when i started with vinyl because it was much easier than i had expect. I thought that I would suck but I didn't..

Today I have get a little more feeling but not as good as CD's, The remain time that you can see when you play cd's felt strange in the beginnig when vinyl don't have it cause when i played I hadn't any opinion about the remaining time, yes i know that it dosen't matter but anyway i'm used to it from cd's.
Now I almost know how fast a record end's.


___________________

www.myspace.com/christianohman

Old Post Jan-11-2005 21:01  Sweden
Click Here to See the Profile for Christian Ö. Click here to Send Christian Ö. a Private Message Visit Christian Ö.'s homepage! Add Christian Ö. to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
djlithium
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Caprica

Visually there is an indication on the record in the form of breaks in the bands. If you understand how that translates into the math behind the music in terms of bars, measures and time signature, time remaining is no longer a concern, it then becomes a simple matter of understanding that all music follows a conventional formula that will introduce and remove or reduce instruments as a track builds or breaks apart from begining to end. Therefore by using this knowledge you can physically look at the record being played and know where your cue points are for release of the record coming in next and where things need to be faded in based on beat, bar, phrase and measure count, not "time remaining" which is useless and incorrect. From there you can use what is visually represented on the record mixed in and determine what an appropriate plan of attack you should have in your head for mixing out - working with those instruments falling off and instruments coming in from record to record. The results are a more natural transition with out really have to "know" the tracks selected inside and out. Once you understand this stuff, you can essentially grab any two records out of say a mail order package you have had come to your door just before you leave to go play at a club and pull them out and mix them more or less with ease (providing they are in the pitch range that feels appropriate going from one to the other in terms of tempo - and no key shifting doesn't really fix this problem) simply by looking at them!

Amazing stuff.

Brutally obvious but many people including a lot of "pro djs" are clueless to this fact. Also many people who teach others how to play are clueless about this technique and why you should use it from a musical stand point (the process essentially being billed over the years as phrase mixing) right from the get go. It helps to ensure a proper understanding of first beat (not release off kick) cueing and that translates into faster and better beat matching skill development - leaving DJs to pay further attention to appropriate EQing technique, crowd interaction, fader control etc. All around a good thing.

After a while as you have discovered from what you have described above, you "just come to know how much time is left" - this is correct, you will essentially gain the skill to just time left but not in minutes and seconds really but "band distance/width to matching band distance/width" (usually ending up being an equal amount of bars which again gets back to the math of music) each of the records. Think of it as lego. If it doesn't smack you in the head with what I mean with that statement, hit my website end email me off of there and I will explain further.


___________________
DJ Lithium
Black Tiger Recordings | NKME Ltd.
www.djlithium.com | www.blacktigerrecordings.com

Old Post Jan-12-2005 03:46  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for djlithium Click here to Send djlithium a Private Message Visit djlithium's homepage! Add djlithium to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ STEEVROCK
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: NOVA



The battle is now over. Lets all now thank and praise the dj gods.


___________________
I will not lose, for in defeat, its a valueable lesson learned, so it evens it up for me.

-Jay Z

Old Post Jan-14-2005 03:31  Dominican Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ STEEVROCK Click here to Send DJ STEEVROCK a Private Message Add DJ STEEVROCK to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
djlithium
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Caprica

nice idea but poorly implimented. Major flaws in that design, but at least someone is thinking.

Still we have to cover off the other end of it. Technology is one thing, filtering through the "noise" is another.


___________________
DJ Lithium
Black Tiger Recordings | NKME Ltd.
www.djlithium.com | www.blacktigerrecordings.com

Old Post Jan-14-2005 05:38  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for djlithium Click here to Send djlithium a Private Message Visit djlithium's homepage! Add djlithium to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
jdat
Jay Van Dat



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: I dont even know

It's totally true that the whole "visual" aspect of the medium is certainly a downside with cds compared to vinyl where you can see the track.

But the cdj1000 do have the wave display form ..... granted it's worthless compared to the "visual" of a vinyl but it's still a step into playing out somewhat properly with cd.

Old Post Jan-15-2005 03:08 
Click Here to See the Profile for jdat Click here to Send jdat a Private Message Add jdat to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Gandido
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Guaynabo, Puerto Rico PRTA #4

quote:
Originally posted by ionized
If anything, CDs are harder to mix on. You can't see the buildups of the track like you can in Vinyl so you need to know the track better. The pitch shifters are less tactile that touching the edge of the platter or twisting the spindle like you do on Vinyl, hence take more getting used to.

Plus if you want to take advantge or loops, samples and reverse play it means you can take your techniques to a much higher level which in turn makes mixing that much harder.

Saying someone lacks the 'skills' because they mix on CDs is just showing your complete ignorance of new technology. Infact I feel sorry for you, since your obviously going to be left behind when more forward thinking DJs embrace the digital format.

Fair enough, if its all about collecting hard to find tracks for you, then Vinyl certainly has it. Your not going to find that kind of nostalgia in the digital realm. But if you mix because you love expressing yourself and creating technical mixes that push forward the genre, then baby... CDs have got it!


I had a post like this written up but I just wanted to make sure that if someone else said it first then he should get the credit.

Exactly what he said. I use both. CDs don't have that "feel" (tactile feel) that vinyl has but they are so much more powerful when you want to get creative.


___________________
Paco Vilaró a.k.a. 'Gandido'

Old Post Jan-19-2005 04:42  Puerto Rico
Click Here to See the Profile for Gandido Click here to Send Gandido a Private Message Visit Gandido's homepage! Add Gandido to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Nemesis44
ZZZZZzzzzzz.....



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton

Saying that CD's are easier or harder to mix on is absolute horse shit. (Pardon the expression)
It's just a question of what you are used to and which one you start with.
You may have to know the track but you should know that with vinyl too and besides the Pioneer has a wave display which may not be perfect but is more than enough to tell you what you need to know.

djlithium says it very well, and to be honest you should know these things as a DJ.

Cheers
Nem


___________________
https://www.mixcloud.com/Calvin_Karass/

Old Post Jan-19-2005 16:57  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Nemesis44 Click here to Send Nemesis44 a Private Message Visit Nemesis44's homepage! Add Nemesis44 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
jusware
tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2004
Location:

The only reason I'm considering migrating to Cds is because I spin psytrance and dark trance. Psytrance is almost impossible to find on vinyl. 99.5% of all new releases are being released on CD.

Old Post Jan-20-2005 22:56  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for jusware Click here to Send jusware a Private Message Add jusware to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
djlithium
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Caprica

LIE~!!!

You are obviously looking on the wrong end of the planet for your Psytrance. Try hongkong. Not London.


___________________
DJ Lithium
Black Tiger Recordings | NKME Ltd.
www.djlithium.com | www.blacktigerrecordings.com

Old Post Jan-21-2005 05:45  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for djlithium Click here to Send djlithium a Private Message Visit djlithium's homepage! Add djlithium to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > Vinyls vs. CDs
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (57): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackTrance song in foreign language(not eng) [2008] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackFerry Corsten - "I Love You" [2006]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!