|
| quote: | | TranceGeek: umm, i wouldnt consider mauro picotto progressive |
LoL. I give you credit for boldly stating your opinion mate! however, i beg to differ, as i am sure a lot of other would agree: Mauro Picotto IS PROGRESSIVE HIMSELF. I believe he is changing the face of progressive trance/techno.
Who do we think sets the boundaries and genres of techno music as a whole? the recording industry, i believe, and the artists who make the music. How would we find out what kind of music is what? By the labels of genre written on the compilation CD's.
I have yet to see a digweed or Bedrock CD say "Progressive Mix", although i have seen numerous Picotto CD's labeled as such. This does not mean that Digweed isn't good. It doesn't have to be "progressive" to be good. I consider Digweed "trance" music. Basically if the song has a beginning, a middle, and an end, then its NOT progressive.
I've seen DJ Mark Ski's, DJ CAffine's, DJ Gary D.'s, and the Technodrome CD's, etc. etc. etc. all either labeled or TITLED "Progressive Mix." ... and its all the hard tunes you hear Picotto playing in his sets . (here i use Picotto for reference b/c most of the other guys i've mentioned no one has ever heard of....).
Now whether its called Progressive Trance or Progressive Techno (there is another debate going on about this), i have no idea. On all my CDs (i actually buy instead of Napstering), it varies. some say prog. techno, some say prog. trance, but they all sound the same.
hope this helps.
not meant to start fights or put anyone down. cheers!
-the ABT experience-
___________________
Peace.
|