|
yea... pioneer won't be able to sue unless the innards of the behringer are the same as a djm500/600, which they aren't seeing as how a behringer is 24 bits in comparison with 16 bits of djms. They're not using the same wiring and circuitry (exactly) inside the mixer, which from a legal standpoint means they're not copying because this mixer may look the same, but is different - even slightly.
Seeing as how mixers can look alike very easily for many mixers, it would be a hard fought court case.
I don't frankly care that behringer may make quality products, thats easy when you basically copy a long-standing quality product.
Their mixer's good purchase, but only because they didn't have to spend any money on r&d, and their only costs are raw materials.
However, for the amount of time pioneer's had this mixer on the market, you would expect a drop in price, seeing as how these things have sold since last decade and most likely have paid off all the work that went into. Obviously they're looking for more profit from the name now. Simply because, when has pioneer even had a long-standing name in the dj world since these mixers came out?
Gah... enough of that.
Get the behringer if you're short on cash, its a good deal, is the bottom line. Whats done is done.
|