|
Once I turned on the radio in the middle of one of James Ash's 2-step/garage sets.
I'm still getting counselling for it. 
But seriously though, I find it really hard to believe in all this paranormal activity that you're talking about. There's just always a more rational explanation for everything when you look into it a bit deeper.
I mean first of all, ghosts. What exactly are they meant to be? The lost souls of dead people? So what determines whether you become a ghost or not, then? Why do they only ever appear at night? What's their physical composition like? Are they just made of light/electricity? If so, then ghosts appear to break just about every physical law there is. Firstly, light is invisible by itself, it can only be viewed when it illuminates something, and it has no physical structure of it own (even though it does share some charicteristics with both waves and particles). So, therefore, ghosts can't just be transluscent bodies of light just wandering around it human form, because unless the room was unimaginably dusty, or light has somehow eveolved the ability to arrange itself into some three-dimensional body independant of matter and all current human understanding, we would never be able to see them without them directly contradicting what we understand of the physical nature of light itself.
Secondly, if ghosts are the embodiment of our eternal souls, where do these souls come from? We don't have any evidence to suggest that there is any part of our consciousness that can transcend the physical confines of our brain - in fact all evidence completely opposes this view. How does ones mind - or soul - continue to exist once the physical body has wasted away? What if you die as a baby? Do you come back as an infant ghost (or are you doomed to live the rest of your life in heaven as a baby)? Or do you come back as the person you would have grown up into (which would have some pretty worrying consequences for determinism/free will)? Is there some way that we can increase our chances of returning to this Earth as a ghost after we die (maybe if we passed away in some horrific way)?
Thirdly, if they are just bodies of light or electricity, how are they able to move objects and/or make sounds (apart from a low humming sound maybe)? Why do they feel compelled to throw pots and pans around instead of, say, sneaking into a woman's changing room and enjoying themselves? Why do they prat about haunting people for 100's of years when they could do something practical with their immortality? Like build houses for the homeless or something? Why are all ghosts necessarily malevolent? Why aren't there more ghosts like Casper?
I dunno, the concept of ghosts just seem to contradict these basic tennets of common sense. You've got to understand that when you're all alone in your bedroom, in the dark, your brain is deprived of it's major sensory tool - vision. When it is deprived of vision, the brain heightens all the other senses to compensate (including it's own belief system). Thus, the ears may hear some banging sounds within the house (which they wouldn't have picked up on normally) and the brain, in it's heightened state, falsely attributes these sounds to something that isn't really there. It will make false causal connections to ensure that it isn't caught off guard. Thus, if you hear a series of bangs or creaks, the brain will impose a false pattern upon those sounds and deduce that they are, say, footsteps or something, to ensure that you are alert to even the most unlikely threat of danger. If the brain didn't function in this way, and make us imagine dangers in the night, we wouldn't have evolved very far as a species. That is, if we only believed in that which we could see or knew was an immediate danger, we would have been picked off pretty quickly by nocternal lions.
That is why, then, that during the day we are never scared of ghosts. Our brain is calm, and with the aid of vision, has no need to imagine such fantastic things as ghosts because it has faith that the senses on their own are capable of escaping danger.
Okay then, I didn't mean to write so much crap, I'm just trying to ensure that we keep a rational perspective on things here. Carl Sagan's work lives on. 
|
but does that necsesarily need to mean that its true?
