Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Archives > Classic old threads / Inactive Forums > Retired Forums > Gaming Forum > Half Life 2 Performs better on ATI then Nvidia.
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
DJ Lac
Trance veteran



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island, NY

quote:
Originally posted by AZCA
5900 ULTRA beats 9800 PRO in every test

best FX drivers: 44.65

Image quality test

Image quality test #2

pricewise, 5900FX is cheaper than 9800Pro

Good luck.


You must be the stupidest person I ever met.. You cannot compare old benchmarks to the new one.. Man you really need to get out of that rock your living in. Aquamark is now the official benchmark because nvidia cheated on the 3d mark tests!!! DO SOME NOW RESEARCH!! NOT PAST RESEARCH!!


___________________

HighCouncil

Old Post Sep-19-2003 19:12  Philippines
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Lac Click here to Send DJ Lac a Private Message Add DJ Lac to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Lac
Trance veteran



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island, NY

All of us are trying to explain it to you but you are a thick headed moron that won't even listen but yourself. We explained in the past posts that Nvidia Cheated On The 3d Mark Tests!!.. Why do you think we are giving you the aquamark tests.. The aquamark tests prevents Nvidia or Ati from cheating!!! It is the most accurate benchmark program to date.. Maybe you should try it and see for yourself and give us the low down if it is truly the One.


___________________

HighCouncil

Old Post Sep-19-2003 19:21  Philippines
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Lac Click here to Send DJ Lac a Private Message Add DJ Lac to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
AZCA
A.Y.U



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Planet Earth, Trance Mainland

DJ Lac, u a dumb fuck.

nVidia cheated in 3dmark 2001se, that's why 3dmark 03 was made + nVidia removed the cheat in their drivers.

9600 Pro is compared to 9500 pro, moron, and the latter beats it.

it is useless talking to a dumb fuck like u, later.

Old Post Sep-19-2003 19:56 
Click Here to See the Profile for AZCA Click here to Send AZCA a Private Message Visit AZCA's homepage! Add AZCA to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Lac
Trance veteran



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island, NY

quote:
Originally posted by AZCA
DJ Lac, u a dumb fuck.

nVidia cheated in 3dmark 2001se, that's why 3dmark 03 was made + nVidia removed the cheat in their drivers.

9600 Pro is compared to 9500 pro, moron, and the latter beats it.

it is useless talking to a dumb fuck like u, later.


Lol I really got to you this time.. You really got mad ahaha.. If its so useless to talk to me why even bother replying back to all our posts.. Ya know you had an option to keep it to yourself. Now your temper is off and your calling people names. Its ok to admit it sucks. No harm in that. I know you have a card cuz you wouldn't be defending it. If you don't then you shouldn't have replied in the first place. I was an nvidia fanatic like you, but I realized that these radeons just blew nvidia's cards away. Everyone knew it from the time 8500 pro came out. Nvidia is struggling am sorry to say. FYI: if I was a "dumb fuck" I would be talking like you. Sorry to say that, but its true.

Oh ya don't take it to small detail when I said 9600 comparing to 5600 when you said 9500. Cuz the 5600 was there also.


___________________

HighCouncil

Old Post Sep-19-2003 20:07  Philippines
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Lac Click here to Send DJ Lac a Private Message Add DJ Lac to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
AZCA
A.Y.U



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Planet Earth, Trance Mainland

I am not an nVidia fanatic and never was.

I am neutral and in 0 of my posts said anything bad about RADEON series. I simply pointed out to you that FX is not as bad as u think.

All of your statements are normative and nothing more.

As per what I possess, I am an owner of 2 9700 PRO cards and 1 GeForce 4 MX, but I also had a chance to work with FX 5900 and I played some games on FX and my 9700 pro and all normative statements about FX are false, it's a great card in reality.

9700 pro heats up very much and very hot, where as FX is cool, but fans are much louder than in 9xxx series of ATI.

Working with 3D STUDIO MAX, Rendering and real time DirectX 9.0B viewing in 3D angle spins much faster on FX.

ATI is only looking at games market, try doing some 3D graphics on it, you will see how poor their drivers are.

Old Post Sep-19-2003 20:41 
Click Here to See the Profile for AZCA Click here to Send AZCA a Private Message Visit AZCA's homepage! Add AZCA to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Lac
Trance veteran



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island, NY

quote:
Originally posted by AZCA
I am not an nVidia fanatic and never was.

I am neutral and in 0 of my posts said anything bad about RADEON series. I simply pointed out to you that FX is not as bad as u think.

All of your statements are normative and nothing more.

As per what I possess, I am an owner of 2 9700 PRO cards and 1 GeForce 4 MX, but I also had a chance to work with FX 5900 and I played some games on FX and my 9700 pro and all normative statements about FX are false, it's a great card in reality.

9700 pro heats up very much and very hot, where as FX is cool, but fans are much louder than in 9xxx series of ATI.

Working with 3D STUDIO MAX, Rendering and real time DirectX 9.0B viewing in 3D angle spins much faster on FX.

ATI is only looking at games market, try doing some 3D graphics on it, you will see how poor their drivers are.


Alright well.. All I gotta say Radeons are never meant for Rendering and that doesn't compare how it performs on a game. There is a difference between rendering and the calculations that load up in a Huge world map. If you want to do rendering why don't you buy a FIRE card. Never compare Applications with Games because they are totally different. It's like saying I'm comparing Photoshop to Unreal tournament. If thats why you think the FX is better your in a whole other ball game cuz we are talking two seperate topics here.


___________________

HighCouncil

Old Post Sep-19-2003 21:07  Philippines
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Lac Click here to Send DJ Lac a Private Message Add DJ Lac to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
TheDemon
Doggy Style Addict



Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Dark Sector World!

I read an article a couple of days back and iam looking for the link. It states that Eidos released a patch for Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness which boosted performance in the cards. Most notably the 5900ultra and the Radeon 9800. However, the patch also had a benchmarking prog. which benchmarked both cards and the 9800 beat the 5900 ultra. Nvidia promptly told Eidos to remove the patch from their website. So whats the point of this whole rant, Tomb Raider:Angel of darkness has a "the way it's meant to be played" Nvidia logo and still failed to the Ati radeon in the benchmark.


___________________

Old Post Sep-20-2003 00:35  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for TheDemon Click here to Send TheDemon a Private Message Add TheDemon to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
TheDemon
Doggy Style Addict



Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Dark Sector World!

quote:
Originally posted by TheDemon
I read an article a couple of days back and iam looking for the link. It states that Eidos released a patch for Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness which boosted performance in the cards. Most notably the 5900ultra and the Radeon 9800. However, the patch also had a benchmarking prog. which benchmarked both cards and the 9800 beat the 5900 ultra. Nvidia promptly told Eidos to remove the patch from their website. So whats the point of this whole rant, Tomb Raider:Angel of darkness has a "the way it's meant to be played" Nvidia logo and still failed to the Ati radeon in the benchmark.



here's the link. just scroll down a bit.
http://www.tech-report.com/news_arc...iew.x/2003/9/16


___________________

Old Post Sep-20-2003 00:39  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for TheDemon Click here to Send TheDemon a Private Message Add TheDemon to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Lac
Trance veteran



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
ROFLLLL!!!!

quote:
Originally posted by TheDemon
here's the link. just scroll down a bit.
http://www.tech-report.com/news_arc...iew.x/2003/9/16


LOLOLOLOLOL


___________________

HighCouncil

Old Post Sep-20-2003 01:13  Philippines
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Lac Click here to Send DJ Lac a Private Message Add DJ Lac to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Archives > Classic old threads / Inactive Forums > Retired Forums > Gaming Forum > Half Life 2 Performs better on ATI then Nvidia.
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackAmbient/Trance tune id please [2009] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackSatoshi Tomiie feat. Kelli Ali - "Up In Flames" (Bedrock Mix) [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!