|
| quote: | Originally posted by AZCA
I am not an nVidia fanatic and never was.
I am neutral and in 0 of my posts said anything bad about RADEON series. I simply pointed out to you that FX is not as bad as u think.
All of your statements are normative and nothing more.
As per what I possess, I am an owner of 2 9700 PRO cards and 1 GeForce 4 MX, but I also had a chance to work with FX 5900 and I played some games on FX and my 9700 pro and all normative statements about FX are false, it's a great card in reality.
9700 pro heats up very much and very hot, where as FX is cool, but fans are much louder than in 9xxx series of ATI.
Working with 3D STUDIO MAX, Rendering and real time DirectX 9.0B viewing in 3D angle spins much faster on FX.
ATI is only looking at games market, try doing some 3D graphics on it, you will see how poor their drivers are. |
Alright well.. All I gotta say Radeons are never meant for Rendering and that doesn't compare how it performs on a game. There is a difference between rendering and the calculations that load up in a Huge world map. If you want to do rendering why don't you buy a FIRE card. Never compare Applications with Games because they are totally different. It's like saying I'm comparing Photoshop to Unreal tournament. If thats why you think the FX is better your in a whole other ball game cuz we are talking two seperate topics here. 
___________________

HighCouncil
|