|
| quote: | Originally posted by tathi
“spell/anti-Israeli/anti-Israeli government” I have nothing against Israelis, that's just another stupid generilisation some people here believe because they are afraid i might be right. I might agree with you that this forum does epitomise the general consensus in its stupidity, you just have to look at Djbaron toscher sedai, melech_mike etcetera
How hypocritically ironic that you call me shallow.
Shallow: Lacking depth of intellect or knowledge; concerned only with what is obvious
If the general consensus belives in it, it must be overtly obvious. You are whinging because you believe this concept “anti-semitism” applies to only a single race. Like you can't stand anyone else being in the limelight. Very shallow
Clear definition? How come your best argument against my apothegm was “apples are not bananas”?
next post:
ambiguous / concise / apple / banana
do you understand what you are doing?
ok then:
What are Hebrews again?
haha, it has everything to do with the way you think.
Seeing people realise they are in denial gives me a lot of satisfaction, for example:
Does it hurt you that the term literally applies to more than the jews but figuratively applies to only jews? I really do not care about the word itself, the word is just a concept, the way it is used to justify certain things that i will not go into here is what i dislike.
Sadly, it's a great propaganda tool, the word has justified alot in the name of “defense”
I'm working on it
The Quran is a very peaceful doctrine, jihad basically means 'holy struggle' or the right to defend yourself against oppression and against people who will not let you practice your religion. The word has been misconstrued for propaganda reasons. West claims jihad against them, east claims crusade against them blah blah. Did you know "martyrdom" can be achieved through acting peacefully, similar to obeying hte christian ten commandments, this concept has been prevaricated by terrorist extremist to recruit more uneducated fools for their cause
trancegiant try and fit in another post before i go to bed. when i am tired is the best time to catch me off gaurd, hurry! |
You so over-complicate it in your poor attempts to somehow prevent defeat. Or is it just another act of masturbation as seen in your neverending fight with Toscher? It's obvious you don't give a damn about the subject itself, it's the fighting only which gives you satisfaction. To keep going and maintain your pleasure you take this to the most obscure directions. In a word: Ridiculous.
You way of taking statements out of context and putting words into my mouth is indeed shallow. It is not how serious debating is done. But as already said, you don't even want to have a serious debate, all you're up to is fighting for the sake of fighting.
| quote: | | If the general consensus belives in it, it must be overtly obvious. You are whinging because you believe this concept “anti-semitism” applies to only a single race. Like you can't stand anyone else being in the limelight. Very shallow |
I repeat: This is how languages work. You can have your own meanings of words and talk to yourself, or simply adjust to the general consensus on which every language is built, and be able to successfully communicate with others.
As for the clear definition, I already mentioned the Oxofrd and any other Dictionary. This is where you told me to look for in the first place, isnt it? What is your defintion of a clear definition when it comes to words? 
Saying that the word itself is hypocritical and deceptive was referring to the fact that its creators tried to make it look "scientifical" and therefore poltically correct. The science of racial differences was widely accepted in the late 19th century and therefore this racist term of anti-semitsim (aimed at Jews exclusively form the very beginning) was a good way of changing from religious to a more "serious" (people began abandoning faith) approach. That's why I call it deceptive. By hypocritically talking about the race, ther hatred was scientifically justified.
| quote: | Does it hurt you that the term literally applies to more than the jews but figuratively applies to only jews? I really do not care about the word itself, the word is just a concept, the way it is used to justify certain things that i will not go into here is what i dislike.
|
literally-->dictionary definition--> proves your statement wrong.
I'll agree with you if you say that theoretically it applies to all Semites. Once you use the word, however, you'll have to look for it real meaning, which ,as already said 54 times, is based on the definition, the general consensus and its roots, all of which leading to the conclusion that Jews only are meant.
If you actually used the word the way you'd like to, you'd only justify its creators in their attempt to mask anti-Jewish sentiments with racial theories.
In fact the word antisemitism, deceptive and basically false, ought not be used at all. It's wrong from the very beginning. IF however it's used, then you cannot but use it the right way which is the opposite to yours.
|
