quote:

Originally posted by rizen well i find him creditable even when he was on fox ...

Ah, lovely. You find him credible, therefore he is credible.

This is starting to sound like the religious discussions...

Even if he is a credible source, it does not make him an authoritative or expert source. If President Bush were on trial and you brought this guy in as an "expert witness", I can assure you that his testimony would promptly be thrown out of court upon legal objections (not an expert witness).

___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut Ah, lovely. You find him credible, therefore he is credible. This is starting to sound like the religious discussions... Even if he is a credible source, it does not make him an authoritative or expert source. If President Bush were on trial and you brought this guy in as an "expert witness", I can assure you that his testimony would promptly be thrown out of court upon legal objections (not an expert witness).

heheh you still dont get it do you... i already said you were right and that hackworth had no real source. also he as for your example, he could be an expert witness if it was a military related, cause we all know how experienced bush is.

quote:

Originally posted by occrider Everything is propoganda ...

and everything is biased... but lets not get into that again

rizen don't worry.. i got my slaves, um i mean workers, out on the fields right now... you wouldn't think I would actually do the picking did you?!

___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!


Click here to support the free mustard alliance.

quote:

Originally posted by rizen ...also he as for your example, he could be an expert witness if it was a military related, cause we all know how experienced bush is.

The credibility of Bush as an expert witness is entirely independent of the credibility of Hackworth as an expert witness.

Your logic seems to be, Hackworth qualifies as an expert because he knows more than Bush - I'm sure you see the problem inherent in that.

___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut The credibility of Bush as an expert witness is entirely independent of the credibility of Hackworth as an expert witness. Your logic seems to be, Hackworth qualifies as an expert because he knows more than Bush - I'm sure you see the problem inherent in that.

in real military combat, yes.