 |
|
|
|
 |
Noisician
Harsh electronic purity

Registered: Aug 2001
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by [BE]FusioN`--
Hey everything's possible, sure there will be people who like the track for what it is and i'm sure you do, but i'm also sure some people who say this track is brilliant would hate it if they didn't know it was made by mike.
|
it's not just mike or oakenfold or paul van dyk; it concerns all famous producers out there. the thing is, some people here only seem to care about the names, and not the actual music. whenever their beloved producer releases something new, that production automatically becomes an instant classic, no matter how bad it may actually sound. such people are mere puppets who will drool over anything even remotely related to their idols. that's why, when such a producer creates a particularly weak composition, his/her idolaters never admit it to be a poorly-produced piece of trash. instead, they prefer to call it an EXPERIMENT. not a half-assed attempt of making things as what it actually is, but an experiment (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean). pvd's latest album is an obvious example of that. it's a rather insipid and uninspired production of his. and yet some people are persistently trying to come up with an excuse that would make up for its overall poor quality. they say pvd, being a god, is not capable of doing mistakes - he is just experimenting. say, isn't it fuckin great? what a spunky experimentalist he must be to come with such crap as "reflections"... or take this new project of mike that is obviously oriented to a bigger, mainstream audience. with this *generic* creation, he utilizes a well-known scheme to appeal to a larger, far-less fastidious group of listeners, which will certainly boost up its sales. so what is it then, another experiment? no, just a blatant hunt for money.
___________________
|
|
Jan-22-2004 00:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
TOR
Traveller

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Bruges, Belgium
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Noisician
take this new project of mike that is obviously oriented to a bigger, mainstream audience. with this *generic* creation, he utilizes a well-known scheme to appeal to a larger, far-less fastidious group of listeners, which will certainly boost up its sales. so what is it then, another experiment? no, just a blatant hunt for money. [/color] |
as i said before: it's not a loop repeating itself all the time
the production IS good, it contains a lot of different elements to keep it interesting..
if it was only for money, he wouldn't have combined all these elements from different styles. he would just have created a catchy groove and thrown a bunch of random 'i love you' vocals on it.. this is definitely not the case.
___________________
| quote: | Originally texted by Jakhira
Out with the dog at the moment. Chicks love him, and I love chicks... The world is in harmony  |
|
|
Jan-22-2004 15:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
Wildfir3
Seriously Opinionated

Registered: Jul 2003
Location: La La Land
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Noisician
it's not just mike or oakenfold or paul van dyk; it concerns all famous producers out there. the thing is, some people here only seem to care about the names, and not the actual music. whenever their beloved producer releases something new, that production automatically becomes an instant classic, no matter how bad it may actually sound. such people are mere puppets who will drool over anything even remotely related to their idols. that's why, when such a producer creates a particularly weak composition, his/her idolaters never admit it to be a poorly-produced piece of trash. instead, they prefer to call it an EXPERIMENT. not a half-assed attempt of making things as what it actually is, but an experiment (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean). pvd's latest album is an obvious example of that. it's a rather insipid and uninspired production of his. and yet some people are persistently trying to come up with an excuse that would make up for its overall poor quality. they say pvd, being a god, is not capable of doing mistakes - he is just experimenting. say, isn't it fuckin great? what a spunky experimentalist he must be to come with such crap as "reflections"... or take this new project of mike that is obviously oriented to a bigger, mainstream audience. with this *generic* creation, he utilizes a well-known scheme to appeal to a larger, far-less fastidious group of listeners, which will certainly boost up its sales. so what is it then, another experiment? no, just a blatant hunt for money. |
i do partially agree with you, although i still believe there are a lot of people who will love the music for what it is. Same thing with pvd, i for example DO love some songs of his 'reflections' album (crush, nothing but you, time of our lives, three 'commercial' examples). I don't say the entire cd rox or something, but it has it good songs.
I just can't stand people who act like sheep just blindly following artists and praising them for every sound they create. And again, i'm not talking about the people who actually DO love the music (like tor clearly)
___________________
www.doehetzelver.be
|
|
Jan-22-2004 16:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ste
Planet Zogg Addict

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Outer Dementia
|
|
|
Jan-22-2004 16:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ste
Planet Zogg Addict

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Outer Dementia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Noisician
it's not just mike or oakenfold or paul van dyk; it concerns all famous producers out there. the thing is, some people here only seem to care about the names, and not the actual music. whenever their beloved producer releases something new, that production automatically becomes an instant classic, no matter how bad it may actually sound. such people are mere puppets who will drool over anything even remotely related to their idols. that's why, when such a producer creates a particularly weak composition, his/her idolaters never admit it to be a poorly-produced piece of trash. instead, they prefer to call it an EXPERIMENT. not a half-assed attempt of making things as what it actually is, but an experiment (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean). pvd's latest album is an obvious example of that. it's a rather insipid and uninspired production of his. and yet some people are persistently trying to come up with an excuse that would make up for its overall poor quality. they say pvd, being a god, is not capable of doing mistakes - he is just experimenting. say, isn't it fuckin great? what a spunky experimentalist he must be to come with such crap as "reflections"... or take this new project of mike that is obviously oriented to a bigger, mainstream audience. with this *generic* creation, he utilizes a well-known scheme to appeal to a larger, far-less fastidious group of listeners, which will certainly boost up its sales. so what is it then, another experiment? no, just a blatant hunt for money. |
although i am really impartial to anything in this thread, your post is such a good represetation of some of the goings on on TA 
___________________
Fave Tune at the Moment: Mesmerizer - Taking Control
>>> Download my mix here <<< (Electro, Techno & Psy-Trance)
|
|
Jan-22-2004 16:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:07.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|