 |
|
|
|
 |
Timothy
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Holland
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by electron
Funny you should say that. I just bought the DVD and watched it last nite. Yup, besides watching Tiesto grinning non stop i get to see what's in his studio!
So far i can make out.. Alesis Andromeda and Korg Karma. I can't see if he's got a virus or JP8000 tho. Can't make out the speakers either but they are definitely KRK's. (yellow cones) |
Tiesto's gear:
Pc
Intel Pentium 4/3.2 Ghz w/1,024 MB Ram
Monitors
KRK 8000-series
Mengtafel
Sony DMX-R100 48-channel digital console w/digital switchable patch bay for analog signal processing
Software
Steinberg Cubase Sx 2.0
Synth
Access Virus B, Virus C synths
Alesis Andromedia A6
E-mu Vintage Pro, proteus 2000 synths
Moog Music Minimoog Voyager
Yamaha CS6X, CS6R, FS1R, synths
Roland Alpha Juno 2, JD-990, JP-8000, JP8080 (2), MKS-80, XV-3080 synths
Korg Triton
Drum computers
Linn Electronics LinnDrum
Roland TR-909
Samplers
Akai S6000 2x
Akai MPC3000XL
Reverb's
Lexicon 480 rackmont
TC Electronic M-One rackmont
Digital delay
Roland SDE-3000
Converter
Yamaha MSS1 SMPTE/MTC
Sound module
Waldorf MicroWaveXT
Mixer
Pioneer DJM-600
Turntabels
Pioneer CDJ-1000
Technics SL-1200MK2 2x
___________________
Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity
|
|
Nov-26-2004 13:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
electron
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
|
|
|
Timothy you are DA man! How did you manage to spot all that gear? But at least i was not wrong hehe.
Ok, im actually surprised to see that the No.1 and No.2 DJs in the world using KRK monitors ONLY (no 2nd set). I have to investigate this speaker further!
I know Ferry and Armin use the Mackie HR824s
|
|
Nov-26-2004 13:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
tbh, im surprised anyone needs all this gear. 2 jp8080s and a jp8000? why?! you dont have to bounce as much but...
i wonder if most of them know even one synth inside out cuz synths are complicated monsters. life consumingly so. just one, more often than not has a mind boggling variety of sonic possibilities. if i had 20 of the best id be in my studio all the time, grinning constantly. but i dont think id get very much done. wouldnt know where to start. wouldnt be inclined to scratch the surface of even 1 of the many toys that im surrounded by. but maybe thats just me.
a case of G.A.S? (Gear Aquisition Syndrome)
|
|
Nov-26-2004 15:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
cheesy
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA / Seattle, WA / S.F. Bay Area, CA
|
|
|
Nov-26-2004 18:35
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
really? i would have thought he would have at least some input. i mean. production is so important. how can you control every aspect of the music you write if you dont produce your own tracks?!
|
|
Nov-26-2004 19:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
you may well be right cyrus, cuz im not too well up on what these people are doing. but when you muck around with synths and make electronic based music, it just seems natural that you would produce your own work. when you build synth patches thats production in a way. i find it hard to believe that he lets some joe producer handle the entire engineering process of his songs. engineering and song writing in electronic music are like 2 halves of the same coin.
pop music has this generic quality to it, this anonymity that screams 'this tune was written by person A who mailed the lyrics and notes to manager B who sent them to producer C who passed it onto his engineering colleague D.' it sounds empty cuz theres so many people involved in the making of a pop record and its extremely well produced but nobody has stamped their individuality on the tune. nobody in essence, follows through with their idea for the song, from conception to completion. thats why i feel that alot of pop consists of a mish mash of established styles and generic techniques both in musical and production terms. you get the impression that in some cases, the people making the tune dont really care that much about it. like its just a job. as far as you can tell all this from a song without seeming like jumping the gun.
stuff like urban train though has this real kind of energy to it. i dunno. maybe its just me. i dont think it could have been an entirely anonymous process like certain types of really manufactured pop.
|
|
Nov-27-2004 01:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
so why does he have a studio full of equipment that turns pretty much everyone here, green with envy? why do the producers not get a credit in the title of the collaboration if they are essentially the song writers? i could understand maybe if they wanted to capitalise on the man's good looks and/or his charisma to sell records but hes fugly and from what i hear a twat aswell. so its not one of those reasons.
|
|
Nov-27-2004 01:39
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:11.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|