quote:

Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 I read all that was on that page, I didn't have a sign in name or anything like that,So I couldn't get the rest of the article.

You can sign in for free, provided that you watch a short infomercial thingy. And that gives you a free one-day pass. Didn't you see that part? That's how you are able to see the rest of the article.

If this is not satisfactory for you, I'm willing to post the entire article here if needed.

quote:

Bush wasn't AWOL, I'm not going any further with this. I've already laid it out for you.

Why aren't you going any further? Once again, your rebuttals come down to, "because I say so". This is becoming quite tedious. You really need better debating skills than this. You laid it out for me, and I demonstrated with a weblink to a prior thread where I find discrepencies in Bush's story. You wish to make a comment on those discrepencies? If not, I suggest you cease from bringing up a topic which you do not wish to discuss further.

quote:

Try again, If you want I can post you a article that my dad emailed me today. It's totally worth reading.

And I can post practically every newspaper headline, likely even some conservative media, which shows the Bush Admin. likely has a share in the blame. You've got to be seriously delusional to think Bush had absolutely no fault whatsoever. I believe even the biggest Bush supporters here would agree to that in part. Here's just a few headlines:

"Panel Says Bush Saw Repeated Warnings
Reports Preceded August 2001 Memo"
By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 14, 2004; Page A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2004Apr13.html

Here's the Phoenix Memo, warning of "cadre of Osama bin Laden disciples might be training at U.S. flight schools in preparation for future 'terror activity against civil aviation targets.':
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archiv...42phoenix1.html

"Probing the Memo
A declassified President's Daily Brief sparks questions about 9/11"
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/a...-610045,00.html

"Press Didn't Buy White House Spin on 9/11 Document"
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/e...t_id=1000485027

"Ashcroft Cut off Al-Qaeda Briefings, Ex-FBI Official Testifies"
(of course Ashcroft flat-out denied this in his testimony):
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/new...=top_world_news

But as I said previously, the blame can be shared amongst a wide range of individuals and administrations, both democrat and republican, as well as intelligence agencies. Of course, conclusions should not be fully drawn until the final commission report comes out in July, but as it's evidenced presently, blame can be shared amongst many, including the Bush Admin. being a little bit negligent. I'm not much of a bettin' man, but I'm willin' to put a little friendly wager that the final commission report will have at least some blame on the Bush Admin. Care to bet?

And I would be interested in seeing that email, so could you post it, please?

quote:

Like I said,It was in the Limbaugh letter. ( Or did I say that? ) Anyway, I don't have the weblink. I just read it in the Limbaugh letter. It wasn't saying it was all liberals though, it was just a group of liberals.(A certain specific group.)

Mmkay. As long as we're talking about a certain extremist group of liberals, do you think it would be appropriate for me to share a story about fascist extremist conservatives, then? Would it really have to do with anything? IOW, what is the relevance of you bringing up the story in the first place?

quote:

Of course, that's just how it goes unfortunatly.

No doubt.

quote:

Let me put this out flat, My dad has earned many medals. He worked very very hard in the military,for them. Just a question,did you hear that Kerry is being questioned about his " purple heart " ? If that was all a lie, then seriously. He's lost all my respect ( not that he had any from me anyway. ) Cause my great uncle Charles has two purple hearts from serving in WWII. That's nothing something to lie about. :/

As Occ pointed out, do you have a problem with reading other material posted specifically for you? Occ posted an article that explicitly addresses those accusations. Please do us a favor and read it.

And again, you did not answer my question about awarding medals - are they not based on deeds, rather than years of experience? Funny, that's how my grandfather earned his purple heart and silver star in WWII, and he was only in the service for active duty for 3 years. The length of time spent in the military is irrelevant to how many medals you earn. I repeat, surely your father has told you this. Please ask him, if you will, and let us know what his answer is to you.

quote:

I read what was there. Believe it, or don't. But, I did.

How can you read it when you previously admitted not reading the other pages? You're being quite illogical, once again.

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by MisterOpus1 And again, you did not answer my question about awarding medals - are they not based on deeds, rather than years of experience? Funny, that's how my grandfather earned his purple heart and silver star in WWII, and he was only in the service for active duty for 3 years. The length of time spent in the military is irrelevant to how many medals you earn. I repeat, surely your father has told you this. Please ask him, if you will, and let us know what his answer is to you.

I think she has a problem distinguishing between battlefield awards and campaign ribbons or whatever.

___________________
Retro ...

quote:

Originally posted by occrider Well no he must not have worked very hard, because after all, "the longer you stay in the military, the more medals you get. That's just how it is." So he didn't do anything to get the medals ... just like Kerry. Out of curiosity what's the highest medal that he got for doing nothing and simply staying in teh military for a long time?

FYI,My dad set up the Helicopter training division.
My dad worked his butt off,so he could serve the country.

quote:

Really do you read anything anyone else posts? I posted a source that examines the EXACT circumstances of EVERY award Kerry received. You're a big girl, I'm sure you can go back and find it. Nice to see that your Uncle got some medals too by simply staying in the military for a long time.

You aren't listening to a word I said.
My Uncle faught on the FRONT LINES in WWII,in Italy.My uncle was hurt twice during the war. He was awarded two purple hearts, I can't remeber the other awards he was given. But, the fact of the matter is THAT'S a REAL war hero. Not Kerry, But people like my Great Uncle.

___________________
~Nessa

quote:

Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 FYI,My dad set up the Helicopter training division. My dad worked his butt off,so he could serve the country.

Interesting name for a medal.

quote:

You aren't listening to a word I said. My Uncle faught on the FRONT LINES in WWII,in Italy.My uncle was hurt twice during the war. He was awarded two purple hearts, I can't remeber the other awards he was given. But, the fact of the matter is THAT'S a REAL war hero. Not Kerry, But people like my Great Uncle.

I'm going to echo what occ said here. Do you actually know what Kerry did? The man won a bronze star, a silver star, and three purple hearts. Then, when he got back from the war, he was brave enough to stand up and say 'this is wrong' - we need to get out now. Look, attack his policies and his stance on the issues, but where do you get off claiming he isn't a war hero without a shred of evidence to back yourself up. You're launching character assassinations without any evidence - which, quite frankly, is dishonest reprehensible.

And how is Kerry any less of a war hero than your uncle? Hint: because you assert that he is, doesn't mean that it's actually the case. You'll need to present a (logical) argument, or provide some reputable evidence.

Add all that to the fact that his war record is of absolutely no relevance to the campaign. What matters are his policies (which I believe are vastly superior to what Bush has on offer) and the direction he'll take the country in. Bush apparently avoiding the war doesn't matter either - it's all in the past, and is of no relevance today.

___________________
Currently Whoring:

• Space Tribe Vs Electric Universe - Rabbit Hole
  
• CPU - So It Begins
  
• Too Short & Mistah FAB - The Sideshow
  

quote:

Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 You aren't listening to a word I said. My Uncle faught on the FRONT LINES in WWII,in Italy.My uncle was hurt twice during the war. He was awarded two purple hearts, I can't remeber the other awards he was given. But, the fact of the matter is THAT'S a REAL war hero. Not Kerry, But people like my Great Uncle.

He listened quite well to what you said, Nessa. The problem lies with you. You are continuing to show a blatant ignorance to sources that people here post for you to read. Occ posted a source that examines Kerry's war record - did you or did you not read it?

And please tell me the logical difference between your Uncle's SERVICE RECORD (i.e. accomplishments in war) to Kerry's. How is Kerry's record inferior? From what is well known, Kerry has 3 purple hearts, a bronze and a silver star. How is that inferior to your Uncle? How are Kerry's merits in question to you? Are you somehow saying that Kerry does not deserve those medals for putting his ass on the line and saving other people's lives, as well as his own? Are you saying that his well known and well documented military record is all a lie? If so, where is such evidence that no one else has seen? Would that not be the fault of the military for awarding those medals then, if he somehow didn't deserve them? Did he bribe the military to give him those medals? Or did he steal them and somehow "trick" the military into thinking that he was actually awarded them? If so, why hasn't anyone else heard about such outlandish conspiracy theories? Why hasn't Fox News picked up on this? Or Washington Times (or any of Murdoch's papers)? Weekly Standard? Wall Street Journal?

What rational are you utilizing by this ridiculous and irrelevant attempt at character assassination? There is absolutely nothing to argue about Kerry's service record, yet you seem compelled to do so. Why?

You are going further and further out of touch with reality. Earth to Nessa?

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by MisterOpus1 He listened quite well to what you said, Nessa. The problem lies with you. You are continuing to show a blatant ignorance to sources that people here post for you to read. Occ posted a source that examines Kerry's war record - did you or did you not read it?

I told you I did read it,and I assure you. I'm not the problem. ( and I'm not saying he is either. )

quote:

And please tell me the logical difference between your Uncle's SERVICE RECORD (i.e. accomplishments in war) to Kerry's. How is Kerry's record inferior? From what is well known, Kerry has 3 purple hearts, a bronze and a silver star. How is that inferior to your Uncle? How are Kerry's merits in question to you? Are you somehow saying that Kerry does not deserve those medals for putting his ass on the line and saving other people's lives, as well as his own? Are you saying that his well known and well documented military record is all a lie? If so, where is such evidence that no one else has seen? Would that not be the fault of the military for awarding those medals then, if he somehow didn't deserve them? Did he bribe the military to give him those medals? Or did he steal them and somehow "trick" the military into thinking that he was actually awarded them? If so, why hasn't anyone else heard about such outlandish conspiracy theories? Why hasn't Fox News picked up on this? Or Washington Times (or any of Murdoch's papers)? Weekly Standard? Wall Street Journal?

My Uncle is a war hero,Unlike your little friend Kerry.
Reading the articles about Kerry makes me dislike the man more and more.

quote:

What rational are you utilizing by this ridiculous and irrelevant attempt at character assassination? There is absolutely nothing to argue about Kerry's service record, yet you seem compelled to do so. Why? You are going further and further out of touch with reality. Earth to Nessa?

It's not "ridiculous" or " irrelveant".I'm trying to make a point, You are calling Kerry a war hero? He's not. He is absolutely not a war hero,and that's not because he's a liberal. (Yes, I've been through this before with people.)
Just read the articles,then you'll see what I'm saying.There are articles all over the place about Kerry being questioned about his purple hearts.

People like my Great uncle, That's a war hero.

___________________
~Nessa

quote:

Originally posted by arctic Add all that to the fact that his war record is of absolutely no relevance to the campaign. What matters are his policies (which I believe are vastly superior to what Bush has on offer) and the direction he'll take the country in. Bush apparently avoiding the war doesn't matter either - it's all in the past, and is of no relevance today.

Ok,So if his war record is of absolutely no relevance...Then why does he(kerry) bring it up himself?

And since we're on the topic of military here, How is it ok for people to make up something about Bush and his military career,but it's not ok for someone to talk about Kerry's career?
This isn't a time to be a hypocrit.

___________________
~Nessa

Regarding the purple hearts. I don't like to detract from someone serving their country, but it would appear Kerry isn't quite the hero he tries to pass himself off as.

Linkage

quote:

Kerry faces questions over Purple Heart By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff, 4/14/2004 WASHINGTON -- John F. Kerry's tour of duty in Vietnam, distinguished by Silver and Bronze stars and the close-range killing of an enemy fighter, is highlighted in his campaign ads and cheered on the trail. Even the campaign of President Bush, who did not see combat, hasn't tried to make an issue of his opponent's service record. ADVERTISEMENT But as the presidential campaign heats up, some Vietnam veterans are using the Internet and talk radio to question the Democratic candidate's military record. They complain that Kerry's three Purple Hearts were for minor wounds and that he left Vietnam more than six months ahead of schedule under regulations permitting thrice-wounded soldiers to depart early. A review by the Globe of Kerry's war record in preparation for a forthcoming book, "John F. Kerry: The Complete Biography," found that the young Navy officer acted heroically under fire, in one case saving the life of an Army lieutenant. But the examination also found that Kerry's commanding officer at the time questioned Kerry's first Purple Heart, which he earned for a wound received just two weeks after arriving in Vietnam. "He had a little scratch on his forearm, and he was holding a piece of shrapnel," recalled Kerry's commanding officer, Lieutenant Commander Grant Hibbard. "People in the office were saying, `I don't think we got any fire,' and there is a guy holding a little piece of shrapnel in his palm." Hibbard said he couldn't be certain whether Kerry actually came under fire on Dec. 2, 1968, the date in questionand that is why he said he asked Kerry questions about the matter. But Kerry persisted and, to his own "chagrin," Hibbard said, he dropped the matter. "I do remember some questions, some correspondence about it," Hibbard said. "I finally said, `OK, if that's what happened . . . do whatever you want.' After that, I don't know what happened. Obviously, he got it, I don't know how." Kerry declined to talk to the Globe about the issue during the preparation of the Kerry biography. But his press secretary, Michael Meehan, noted that the Navy concluded that Kerry deserved the Purple Heart. During the Vietnam War, Purple Hearts were often granted for minor wounds. "There were an awful lot of Purple Hearts--from shrapnel, some of those might have been M-40 grenades," said George Elliott, who served as a commanding officer to Kerry during another point in his five-month combat tour in Vietnam. (Kerry earlier served a noncombat tour.) "The Purple Hearts were coming down in boxes." Under Navy regulations, an enlistee or officer wounded three times was permitted to leave Vietnam early, as Kerry did. He received all three purple hearts for relatively minor injuries -- two did not cost him a day of service and one took him out for a day or two. The incident that led to Kerry's first Purple Heart was risky, and covert. He and his crew left the safe confines of the huge US base at Cam Ranh Bay, climbing aboard a "skimmer" boat -- a craft similar to a Boston Whaler -- to travel upriver in search of Viet Cong guerrillas. At a beach that was known as a crossing area for enemy contraband traffic, Kerry's crew spotted some people running from a sampan, a flat-bottomed boat, to a nearby shoreline, according to two men serving alongside Kerry that night, William Zaladonis and Patrick Runyon. When the Vietnamese refused to obey a call to stop, Kerry authorized firing to begin. "I assume they fired back," Zaladonis recalled in an interview. But neither he nor Runyon saw the source of the shrapnel that lodged in Kerry's arm. '`We came across the bay onto the beach and I got [hit] in the arm, got shrapnel in the arm," Kerry told the Globe in a 2003 interview. Kerry has also said he didn't know where the shrapnel came from. Back at the base, Kerry told Hibbard he qualified for a Purple Heart, according to Hibbard. Thirty-six years later, Hibbard, reached at his retirement home in Florida, said he can still recall Kerry's wound, and that it resembled a scrape from a fingernail. "I've had thorns from a rose that were worse," said Hibbard, a registered Republican who said he was undecided on the 2004 presidential race. The Globe asked Kerry's campaign whether the Massachusetts senator is certain he was under enemy fire and whether he recalled that a superior officer raised questions about the matter. The campaign did not respond directly to those questions. Instead, Meehan said in a prepared statement that Kerry "received the shrapnel wound early in the course of that combat engagement. " Meehan also provided a copy of a medical report showing treatment for a wound on Dec. 3, 1968. The Purple Heart regulation in effect at that time said that a wound must "require treatment by a medical officer." Nearly three months later, a document was sent to Kerry informing him that he would receive a Purple Heart "for injuries received on 2 December 1968." The Naval Historical Center, which could not locate a copy of the original card for the incident, nonetheless confirmed that Kerry did receive the Purple Heart. Kerry went on to earn another two Purple Hearts and he led more than two dozen missions in which he often faced enemy fire. He won the Silver Star for an action in which he killed an enemy soldier who carried a loaded rocket launcher that could have destroyed Kerry's six-man patrol boat, and he won a Bronze Star for rescuing an Army lieutenant who was thrown overboard and under fire. One reason that Kerry has long divided Vietnam veterans is because of the way he led a group called Vietnam Veterans Against the War after he returned to the United States. While in Vietnam, Kerry began to question the policy of "free-fire zones," which permitted sailors to open fire on rivers where Vietnamese were violating nighttime curfews. He said in a 1971 appearance on "Meet the Press": "There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed, in that I took part in shootings in free-fire zones." Thirty-three years later, that statement still rankles some veterans, apparently including those who have formed a group called Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry, which has a website devoted to what it calls Kerry's association with the "radical pro-communist" antiwar movement. The statements of that group have been circulated widely over the Internet and picked up on conservative radio talk shows. But some historians said Kerry is being unfairly criticized over his antiwar effort, which is best remembered for his Senate testimony in which he asked why soldiers should be asked to die for a mistake. "Thirty-three years later, his testimony has really proved to be prescient," said historian Stanley Karnow, author of "Vietnam: A History." "The war was a mistake. Nobody knew better that the war was a mistake than the poor grunts out there fighting it." Indeed, some of Kerry's crewmates who were aghast that Kerry had led them into battle and then came home to protest the war now say Kerry was ahead of his time in seeing the mistaken policy. Crewmate James Wasser, who originally felt "betrayed" by Kerry's antiwar leadership, said, "Knowing what I know now, I would have totally agreed with him."

Personally, I'd like to see the medical records.

quote:

Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 I told you I did read it,and I assure you. I'm not the problem. ( and I'm not saying he is either. ) My Uncle is a war hero,Unlike your little friend Kerry. Reading the articles about Kerry makes me dislike the man more and more. It's not "ridiculous" or " irrelveant".I'm trying to make a point, You are calling Kerry a war hero? He's not. He is absolutely not a war hero,and that's not because he's a liberal. (Yes, I've been through this before with people.) Just read the articles,then you'll see what I'm saying.There are articles all over the place about Kerry being questioned about his purple hearts. People like my Great uncle, That's a war hero.

Perhaps we need to have a working definition of "war hero".

So tell me, what would constitute a "war hero" status to you (and don't just say, "my Uncle", we need more than that), and then tell us why Kerry would not fit that description.

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by Shakka Regarding the purple hearts. I don't like to detract from someone serving their country, but it would appear Kerry isn't quite the hero he tries to pass himself off as. Linkage Personally, I'd like to see the medical records.

From snopes.com:

quote:

John Kerry was wounded in his first significant combat action, when he volunteered for a special mission on 2 December 1968: "It was a half-assed action that hardly qualfied as combat, but it was my first, and that made it very exciting," [Kerry said]. "Three of us, two enlisted men and myself, had stayed up all night in a Boston Whaler [a foam-filled-fiberglass boat] patrolling the shore off a Viet Cong-infested peninsula north of Cam Ranh . . . Most of the night had been spent being scared shitless by fisherman whom we would suddenly creep up on in the darkness. Once, one of the sailors was so startled by two men who surprised us as we came around a corner ten yards from the shore that he actually pulled the trigger on his machine gun. Fortunately for the two men, he had forgotten to switch off the safety . . ." As it turned out, the two men really were just a pair of innocent fisherman who didn't know where one zone began and the other ended. Their papers were perfectly in order, if their night's fishing over. The fear was that they were VC. Allowing them to continue might have compromised the mission. For the next four hours Kerry's Boston Whaler, using paddles, brought boatloads of fisherman they found in sampans, all operating in a curfew zone, back to the Swift. It was tiring work. "We deposited them with the Swift boat that remained out in the deep water to give us cover," Kerry continued. "Then, very early in the morning, around 2:00 or 3:00, while it was still dark, we proceeded up the tiny inlet between the island and the peninsula to the point designated as our objective. The jungle closed in on us on both sides. It was scary as hell. You could hear yourself breathing. We were almost touching the shore. Suddenly, through the magnified moonlight of the infrared 'starlight scope,' I watched, mesmerized, as a group of sampans glided in toward the shore. We had been briefed that this was a favorite crossing area for VC trafficking contraband." With its motor turned off, Kerry paddled the Boston Whaler out of the inlet into the beginning of the bay. Simultaneously the Vietnamese pulled their sampans up onto the beach and began to unload something; he couldn't tell what, so he decided to illuminate the proceedings with a flare. The entire sky seemed to explode into daylight. The men from the sampans bolted erect, stiff with shock for only an instant before they sprang for cover like a herd of panicked gazelles Kerry had once seen on TV's Wild Kingdom. "We opened fire," he went on. "The light from the flares started to fade, the air was full of explosions. My M-16 jammed, and as I bent down in the boat to grab another gun, a stinging piece of heat socked into my arm and just seemed to burn like hell. By this time one of the sailors had started the engine and we ran by the beach, strafing it. Then it was quiet. "We stayed quiet and low because we did not want to illuminate ourselves at that point," Kerry explained. "In the dead of night, without any knowledge of what kind of force was there, we were not all about to go crawling on the beach to get our asses shot off. We were unprotected; we didn't have ammunition, we didn't have cover, we just weren't prepared for that . . . So we first shot the sampans so that they were destroyed and whatever was in them was destroyed." Then their cover boat warned of a possible VC ambush in the small channel they had to exit through, and Kerry and company departed the area. The "stinging piece of heat" Kerry felt in his arm had been caused by a piece of shrapnel, a wound for which he was awarded a Purple Heart. The injury was not serious — Brinkley notes that Kerry went on a regular Swift boat patrol the next day with a bandage on his arm, and the Boston Globe quoted William Schachte, who oversaw the mission and went on to become a rear admiral, as recalling that "It was not a very serious wound at all."

So it wasn't very serious, and he had a wrap on it the following day. I suppose if you want to take the purple heart away from him, that's fine. The Navy, however, was the one who rewarded it to him, so is this not a Navy issue? Furthermore, if you take that purple heart away from him, I believe the Navy will have to take ALL purple hearts away from ALL veterans who've suffered a lesser injury that runs in similar fashion to Kerry's, first injury.

You really think it's important enough to see his medical record? From your article:

quote:

Meehan also provided a copy of a medical report showing treatment for a wound on Dec. 3, 1968. The Purple Heart regulation in effect at that time said that a wound must "require treatment by a medical officer."

What more needs be said, and furthermore, is this really a big enough campaign issue? It's kind of setting up a strawmen attack to me, and if anyone has issues with this one medal, I suggest you take up those issues with the Navy who gave him the medal (as well as giving many other purple heart medals with similar slight injuries) in the first place.

And lastly, from your article:

quote:

"I've had thorns from a rose that were worse," said Hibbard, a registered Republican who said he was undecided on the 2004 presidential race.

Sorry, but I call "bullshit" on this "unbiased" point of view. Undecided, my ass!

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Nessa, would saving the lives of your fellow servicemen constitute "war hero" status? I believe a sane individual would tend to think so:

Kerry's Silver Star:

quote:

Kerry earned his Silver Star on 28 February 1969, when he beached his craft and jumped off it with an M-16 rifle in hand to chase and shoot a guerrilla who was running into position to launch a B-40 rocket at Kerry's boat. Contrary to the account quoted above, Kerry did not shoot a "Charlie" who had "fired at the boat and missed," whose "rocket launcher was empty," and who was "already dead or dying" after being "knocked down with a .50 caliber round." Kerry's boat had been hit by a rocket fired by someone else — the guerrilla in question was still armed with a live B-40 and had only been clipped in the leg; when the guerrilla got up to run, Kerry assumed he was getting into position to launch a rocket and shot him: On Feb. 28, 1969, Kerry's boat received word that a swift boat was being ambushed. As Kerry raced to the scene, his boat became another target, as a Viet Cong B-40 rocket blast shattered a window. Kerry could have ordered his crew to hit the enemy and run. But the skipper had a more aggressive reaction in mind. Beach the boat, Kerry ordered, and the craft's bow was quickly rammed upon the shoreline. Out of the bush appeared a teenager in a loin cloth, clutching a grenade launcher. An enemy was just feet away, holding a weapon with enough firepower to blow up the boat. Kerry's forward gunner, [Tommy] Belodeau, shot and clipped the Viet Cong in the leg. Then Belodeau's gun jammed, according to other crewmates (Belodeau died in 1997). [Michael] Medeiros tried to fire at the Viet Cong, but he couldn't get a shot off. In an interview, Kerry added a chilling detail. "This guy could have dispatched us in a second, but for . . . I'll never be able to explain, we were literally face to face, he with his B-40 rocket and us in our boat, and he didn't pull the trigger. I would not be here today talking to you if he had," Kerry recalled. "And Tommy clipped him, and he started going [down.] I thought it was over." Instead, the guerrilla got up and started running. "We've got to get him, make sure he doesn't get behind the hut, and then we're in trouble," Kerry recalled. So Kerry shot and killed the guerrilla. "I don't have a second's question about that, nor does anybody who was with me," he said. "He was running away with a live B-40, and, I thought, poised to turn around and fire it." Asked whether that meant Kerry shot the guerrilla in the back, Kerry said, "No, absolutely not. He was hurt, other guys were shooting from back, side, back. There is no, there is not a scintilla of question in any person's mind who was there [that] this guy was dangerous, he was a combatant, he had an armed weapon." Another member of the crew confirmed Kerry's account for the Boston Globe and expressed no doubt that Kerry's action had saved both the boat and its crew: The crewman with the best view of the action was Frederic Short, the man in the tub operating the twin guns. Short had not talked to Kerry for 34 years, until after he was recently contacted by a Globe reporter. Kerry said he had "totally forgotten" Short was on board that day. Short had joined Kerry's crew just two weeks earlier, as a last-minute replacement, and he was as green as the Arkansas grass of his home. He said he didn't realize that he should have carried an M-16 rifle, figuring the tub's machine guns would be enough. But as Kerry stood face to face with the guerrilla carrying the rocket, Short realized his predicament. With the boat beached and the bow tilted up, a guard rail prevented him from taking aim at the enemy. For a terrifying moment, the guerrilla looked straight at Short with the rocket. Short believes the guerrilla didn't fire because he was too close and needed to be a suitable distance to hit the boat squarely and avoid ricochet debris. Short tried to protect his skipper. "I laid in fire with the twin .50s, and he got behind a hootch," recalled Short. "I laid 50 rounds in there, and Mr. Kerry went in. Rounds were coming everywhere. We were getting fire from both sides of the river. It was a canal. We were receiving fire from the opposite bank, also, and there was no way I could bring my guns to bear on that." Short said there is "no doubt" that Kerry saved the boat and crew. "That was a him-or-us thing, that was a loaded weapon with a shape charge on it . . . It could pierce a tank. I wouldn't have been here talking to you. I probably prayed more up that creek than a Southern Baptist church does in a month." Charles Gibson, who served on Kerry's boat that day because he was on a one-week indoctrination course, said Kerry's action was dangerous but necessary. "Every day you wake up and say, 'How the hell did we get out of that alive?'" Gibson said. "Kerry was a good leader. He knew what he was doing." Although Kerry's superiors were somewhat concerned about the issue of his leaving his boat unattended, they nonetheless found his actions courageous and worthy of commendation: When Kerry returned to his base, his commanding officer, George Elliott, raised an issue with Kerry: the fine line between whether the action merited a medal or a court-martial. "When [Kerry] came back from the well-publicized action where he beached his boat in middle of ambush and chased a VC around a hootch and ended his life, when [Kerry] came back and I heard his debrief, I said, 'John, I don't know whether you should be court-martialed or given a medal, court-martialed for leaving your ship, your post,'" Elliott recalled in an interview. "But I ended up writing it up for a Silver Star, which is well deserved, and I have no regrets or second thoughts at all about that," Elliott said. A Silver Star, which the Navy said is its fifth-highest medal, commends distinctive gallantry in action. http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/service.asp

and Kerry's Bronze Star and Purple Heart:

quote:

Kerry was injured yet again on 13 March 1969, in an action for which he was awarded both a Bronze Star and his third Purple Heart. According to Kerry's Bronze Star citation (signed by Admiral Zumwalt himself): Lieutenant (junior grade) Kerry was serving as an Officer-in-Charge of Inshore Patrol Craft 94, one of five boats conducting a Sealords operation in the Bay Hap River. While exiting the river, a mine detonated under another Inshore Patrol Craft and almost simultaneously, another mine detonated wounding Lieutenant (junior grade) Kerry in the right arm. In addition, all units began receiving small arms and automatic weapons fire from the river banks. When Lieutenant (junior grade) Kerry discovered he had a man overboard, he returned upriver to assist. The man in the water was receiving sniper fire from both banks. Lieutenant (junior grade) Kerry directed his gunners to provide suppressing fire, while from an exposed position on the bow, his arm bleeding and in pain and with disregard for his personal safety, he pulled the man aboard. Lieutenant (junior grade) Kerry then directed his boat to return to and assist the other damaged boat to safety. Lieutenant (junior grade) Kerry's calmness, professionalism and great personal courage under fire were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.

Would that constitute a "war hero" for you? Do me a favor, go ask your father if this constitutes "war hero" status for him. Then ask your Uncle. I'd be very hard-pressed to find anyone, despite political opinion of Kerry, who would think these 2 particular instances do not constitute "war hero" status.

Or is it just another darned liberal conspiracy?!?!?!?!?!

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by MisterOpus1 So it wasn't very serious, and he had a wrap on it the following day. I suppose if you want to take the purple heart away from him, that's fine. The Navy, however, was the one who rewarded it to him, so is this not a Navy issue? Furthermore, if you take that purple heart away from him, I believe the Navy will have to take ALL purple hearts away from ALL veterans who've suffered a lesser injury that runs in similar fashion to Kerry's, first injury.

Hey, just stirrin' the pot, Opus! The Navy ranks only second to the Air Force when it comes to pussies!